Author |
Message |
agustindead
Joined: Jul 22, 2015 Posts: 33 Location: Big City, bright lights
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2016 3:50 pm Post subject:
VCO to LFO mod |
|
|
Hi all, maybe someone can lend me a hand with this... I'm going to build a Yusynth VCO and I'd like it to double as an LFO. I'm guessing the part I'll need to change is C8, the 1% cap, is that correct? I plan on putting a switch on the front panel to change between two values. I suppose changing/bypassing R8 and trimming T1 won't get me to a frequency low enough, right?
And, again, assuming C8 is the component to change: which value should I use? Or how can I calculate the approximate frequency range related to its capacity? I really have no idea about the math involved in this, sorry
I'm asking because I'm a bit afraid of messing around with the caps on my already finished VCOs and I'd like to order a 1% cap for the new one. Or is 1% unnecesary for LFO duties?
Thanks!
Edit: well, I just checked and there's no way reducing R8 will make the VCO go slow enough. It gets into "fast LFO" territory, but soon freaks out and stops oscillating.
Last edited by agustindead on Mon May 23, 2016 9:36 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Grumble
Joined: Nov 23, 2015 Posts: 1294 Location: Netherlands
Audio files: 30
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2016 9:20 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
maybe it's a good idea to add a schematic to your post, because if someone who is willing to look into this doesn't have to search for this. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
agustindead
Joined: Jul 22, 2015 Posts: 33 Location: Big City, bright lights
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2016 9:37 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
True, I completely overlooked that, thanks. Edited first post with a link to Yves' schematic. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Grumble
Joined: Nov 23, 2015 Posts: 1294 Location: Netherlands
Audio files: 30
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
agustindead
Joined: Jul 22, 2015 Posts: 33 Location: Big City, bright lights
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2016 11:57 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Thanks Grumble for the help!
Grumble wrote: | Since you already plan to add a switch to choose between VCO and LFO, the easiest way is to just add a capacitor in parallel with R8 with the switch. |
I'm assuming you mean C8 here.
Since just putting a cap in parallel is a pretty simple mod, I just tried on my already built VCOs. It definitely lowers the frequency, but as I go lower and lower, weirdness ensue. I found 470nF gets the VCO into a nice LFO range, but:
- sine and triangle outputs start working more like ramp up, and with something like a 3.3v offset.
- saw and pulse wave seem to have a normal shape (though the PW control is completely off center), but also with a big offset, this time around -3.3v
I don't have a scope to check the exact waveforms and voltages so I'm judging with my ears and voltmeter.
I didn't try re-trimming the oscillator, but it seems like there is no trimming that will work with both LFO and VCO frequency ranges......
Maybe the circuit is just not appropiate for what I want to do? |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
elmegil
Joined: Mar 20, 2012 Posts: 2177 Location: Chicago
Audio files: 16
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2016 5:50 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Possibly not.
I'd suggest maybe breadboarding a Thomas Henry VCO1 and seeing if that works any better in this mode. I was going to make the same suggestion of a bigger cap in parallel to the timing cap.
http://www.birthofasynth.com/Thomas_Henry/Pages/VCO-1.html |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
agustindead
Joined: Jul 22, 2015 Posts: 33 Location: Big City, bright lights
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2016 10:10 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Well, in fact my first plan was using VCO-1. I decided not to because I'd really want a saw out (I looove saw LFOs! ) and the layout size is a bit big for my Eurorack gabinet. I guess I can sort both things redesigning and adding a saw shaper, but I'd rather have something more simple. In fact, tuning or scaling are not that necessary since I'll be using to make FX mainly.
THanks! |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
elmegil
Joined: Mar 20, 2012 Posts: 2177 Location: Chicago
Audio files: 16
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
gdavis
Joined: Feb 27, 2013 Posts: 359 Location: San Diego
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Thu May 26, 2016 11:49 am Post subject:
|
|
|
agustindead wrote: |
Well, in fact my first plan was using VCO-1. I decided not to because I'd really want a saw out (I looove saw LFOs! ) and the layout size is a bit big for my Eurorack gabinet. I guess I can sort both things redesigning and adding a saw shaper, but I'd rather have something more simple. In fact, tuning or scaling are not that necessary since I'll be using to make FX mainly.
THanks! |
In that case, if VCO-1 still doesn't work for you I'd suggest looking at the Yusynth VC-LFO. Might give you an idea how to fix the trimming problem on the VCO. Might also be able to modify it to give the frequency ranges you want instead of using the VCO, but I think the layout is a bit long for euro. _________________ My synth build blog: http://gndsynth.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
agustindead
Joined: Jul 22, 2015 Posts: 33 Location: Big City, bright lights
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 9:56 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Hey thanks, didn't know about that layout. I had etched another layout with the idea of testing some mods (saw shaper, LFO frequency) but then realized it didn't fit into my cabinet so I didn't make any further progress.
It still puts me down the lack of a saw output... I don't know how people can live without saw LFOs...
gdavis wrote: |
In that case, if VCO-1 still doesn't work for you I'd suggest looking at the Yusynth VC-LFO. Might give you an idea how to fix the trimming problem on the VCO. Might also be able to modify it to give the frequency ranges you want instead of using the VCO, but I think the layout is a bit long for euro. |
Sadly, the VCO and the VCLFO seem pretty different (the LFO is based on the 7555). I just checked the VCLFO schematic though and it seems like a good candidate anyway, since tuning stability doesn't really bother me (which the redesign will probably lack) and it has a saw output, FM and a PW control, which are the main things I'm looking for. A PWM input seems easily doable as well. But yes, as you pointed out, the layout won't work as it is since it's too big... I guess I'll have to finally learn how to use Eagle haha.
Basically what I'm looking for is an LFO design with:
-saw out
-FM input
-PW and PWM input
-audio rate capabilities
And that's why I thought modding a VCO would be easier than finding such an LFO... |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
gdavis
Joined: Feb 27, 2013 Posts: 359 Location: San Diego
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 2:46 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
agustindead wrote: |
Hey thanks, didn't know about that layout. I had etched another layout with the idea of testing some mods (saw shaper, LFO frequency) but then realized it didn't fit into my cabinet so I didn't make any further progress.
It still puts me down the lack of a saw output... I don't know how people can live without saw LFOs...
gdavis wrote: |
In that case, if VCO-1 still doesn't work for you I'd suggest looking at the Yusynth VC-LFO. Might give you an idea how to fix the trimming problem on the VCO. Might also be able to modify it to give the frequency ranges you want instead of using the VCO, but I think the layout is a bit long for euro. |
Sadly, the VCO and the VCLFO seem pretty different (the LFO is based on the 7555). I just checked the VCLFO schematic though and it seems like a good candidate anyway, since tuning stability doesn't really bother me (which the redesign will probably lack) and it has a saw output, FM and a PW control, which are the main things I'm looking for. A PWM input seems easily doable as well. But yes, as you pointed out, the layout won't work as it is since it's too big... I guess I'll have to finally learn how to use Eagle haha.
Basically what I'm looking for is an LFO design with:
-saw out
-FM input
-PW and PWM input
-audio rate capabilities
And that's why I thought modding a VCO would be easier than finding such an LFO... |
They're really not that different. The expo converter is simplified in the LFO and the integrator and comparator are done with the 7555 instead of discreetly. But the functional elements are very similar.
The problem you're having with adding a cap in parallel in the VCO sounds like a saw bias issue, which is handled the same way in both, the LFO just has two trimmers that are switched based on the selected cap. You could probably do the same thing with the VCO. Gonna be hard to trim and verify without a scope though. IMO a scope is a critical instrument for DIY.
Learning Eagle isn't a bad idea, then you can always design exactly what you want _________________ My synth build blog: http://gndsynth.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
wackelpeter
Joined: May 05, 2013 Posts: 461 Location: germany
Audio files: 10
|
Posted: Sat May 28, 2016 12:05 am Post subject:
|
|
|
What about the Serge DUSG or VCS?
Don't know if Ken has some PCB's for Euro but they'll run on 12 or 15V without modifications and at least the schematics are available and you can design your own PCB...
They're so brilliant and have many options you can use them... Filter,LFO, sort of VCO, Envelope, etc.
Okay, they're lacking a PWM and a real square output if you don't count the EndOfCircle output pulses... but i think it should be possible to get some square waves with some sort of PWM out of it with the triangle/ramp outputs fed into an comparator with variable treshhold... like in the TGTSH from Ian Fritz... then you would have independent control over rise and fall times or both and also over the comparators treshhold...
P.S. would second that what gdavis wrote... a scope can't harm when into DIY and it's not expensive at all... there are numerous floating around at the various online auction platforms... just don't try to get the defect ones...
P.P.S. i also sometimes use my Thomas Henry 555 VCO'S as LFO as they cover a really wide range and go really deep into the bottom... maybe it's easier to fix them as a VCLFO and going much deeper... _________________ https://soundcloud.com/bastian-j |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
agustindead
Joined: Jul 22, 2015 Posts: 33 Location: Big City, bright lights
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Sun May 29, 2016 1:52 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
gdavis wrote: | They're really not that different. The expo converter is simplified in the LFO and the integrator and comparator are done with the 7555 instead of discreetly. But the functional elements are very similar.
The problem you're having with adding a cap in parallel in the VCO sounds like a saw bias issue, which is handled the same way in both, the LFO just has two trimmers that are switched based on the selected cap. You could probably do the same thing with the VCO. Gonna be hard to trim and verify without a scope though. IMO a scope is a critical instrument for DIY.
Learning Eagle isn't a bad idea, then you can always design exactly what you want |
My knowledge is obviously lacking to notice that, thanks! But going by what you say I'll probably try building a new VCO and modding/trimming it and see if I can make it work. I hope the problem is just the bias and the waveshapes don't need different trimming for LFO ranges, or I'll probably have a hard time switching in and out more than one trimmer for that.... Thanks again!
wackelpeter wrote: | What about the Serge DUSG or VCS?
Don't know if Ken has some PCB's for Euro but they'll run on 12 or 15V without modifications and at least the schematics are available and you can design your own PCB...
They're so brilliant and have many options you can use them... Filter,LFO, sort of VCO, Envelope, etc.
Okay, they're lacking a PWM and a real square output if you don't count the EndOfCircle output pulses... but i think it should be possible to get some square waves with some sort of PWM out of it with the triangle/ramp outputs fed into an comparator with variable treshhold... like in the TGTSH from Ian Fritz... then you would have independent control over rise and fall times or both and also over the comparators treshhold...
P.S. would second that what gdavis wrote... a scope can't harm when into DIY and it's not expensive at all... there are numerous floating around at the various online auction platforms... just don't try to get the defect ones...
P.P.S. i also sometimes use my Thomas Henry 555 VCO'S as LFO as they cover a really wide range and go really deep into the bottom... maybe it's easier to fix them as a VCLFO and going much deeper... |
I always liked those Serge designs, so it may be an option... I started making a raw euro PCB for the DUSG just now in fact. I don't know if it fits what I'm looking for here though. But maybe it's a good chance to go in a new direction.
Sadly, scopes are pretty expensive where I live. I trimmed everything using my audio interface and by ear, but yes, DC bias is pretty hard to get right using what I have. I'll try to get one borrowed and see if I can get the Yusynth VCO trimmed.
I'll check the 555 VCO... If they cover a wide range that might be a good option. I still can't decide if I want a switchable between LFO and audio frequencies VCO or just a REALLY wide range VCO. Thanks! |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
wackelpeter
Joined: May 05, 2013 Posts: 461 Location: germany
Audio files: 10
|
Posted: Mon May 30, 2016 6:29 am Post subject:
|
|
|
For the 555 VCO as LFO i think there are some posts around here at EMF if i remember correctly...
Also Fonik/Matthias has done it as far as i remember and maybe also included it in one of his front panel he offered...
Over here used Scopes are around 50-100 euro at this big online auction platform called ebay...
you can roughly estimate if they're functioning when the seller provides pictures of the scope with the in-built calibration generator showed...
Most people with a little knowledge do this and when someone writes in the description i don't know how to power it up and if it's working anyway, then better stay away and save the money... _________________ https://soundcloud.com/bastian-j |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
gabbagabi
Joined: Nov 29, 2008 Posts: 651 Location: Berlin by n8
Audio files: 23
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|