Author |
Message |
paugui
Joined: Jun 28, 2008 Posts: 555 Location: Marinha Grande, Portugal / Oslo, Norway
Audio files: 4
G2 patch files: 37
|
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:56 pm Post subject:
Kyma as an effects processor |
|
|
How good is the Kyma when it comes to external processing?
Can it get good musical results with the spectacularity of an Eventide, or is it better at experimentation?
Thanks in advance
Paulo |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
robsol
Stream Operator
Joined: Apr 24, 2009 Posts: 2492 Location: Bristol UK
Audio files: 495
|
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2011 4:11 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
I don't know if Kyma can completely replace your Eventide, but it's a lot more flexible. Maybe the Harmonisers have the edge in their particular type of pitchshifting, since that is their speciality. It is hard to compare them though, as Kyma just does so much more, even if you only use it for live processing. _________________ Muied Lumens Sub Forum
Bandcamp |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
paugui
Joined: Jun 28, 2008 Posts: 555 Location: Marinha Grande, Portugal / Oslo, Norway
Audio files: 4
G2 patch files: 37
|
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2011 4:33 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
I wish I had a proper Eventide
Unfortunately I only have an HM80, probably the cheapest model they did, but it still has a nice sound, despite I think mine should have the inside cleaned.
That's also why I'm asking this, cause to get an Eventide H3000D/SE I'd likely have to spend around 700 euros, but I don't think it offers the possibilities the Kyma does, and I already have other nice effects processors, including two Korg A1s and a Sony DPS-V77 for multi-effects, a Roland R880 and a Dynacord DRP20 for reverbs, a Symmetrix 606 and a Roland SRE-555 for delays, so I was thinking it could be better spend a bit more and get a Kyma, especially if it can do some nice processing too.
In what ways is the Kyma more flexible?
And excluding the harmonizer effects, are the effects of the Kyma as good as the ones in the Eventide?
Also, with an old model (I don't think I can afford a Paca or a Pacarana soon...), will it still have enough power to do some complex effects?
Thanks
Paulo |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
robsol
Stream Operator
Joined: Apr 24, 2009 Posts: 2492 Location: Bristol UK
Audio files: 495
|
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2011 5:25 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Hmmm... You could get a Capybara 360 with the stock cards and that would compare pretty well to a Harmonizer in terms of processing power alone. Prices are coming down I think. However...
Kyma is a modular type sound design workstation, and have just about everything you need to explore synthesis and composition ideas, plus a few things you won't find anywhere else. It's sound quality is absolutely superb, and I don't think you would have any problems emulating most personality traits of an Eventide. It has a steep and long learning curve, and does things in slightly unorthodox ways. Not everyone likes the Smalltalk type language you use for parameter fields either, and I can testify that it takes all you've got to get to know Kyma. I have long been a hardware kinda guy so it has been a big culture shock for me.
If you are curious about Kyma it is worth ordering "Kyma X Revealed" from Symbolic Sound to get an idea of what it's all about. One thing to remember though, it is deep, very deep. Very very deep. _________________ Muied Lumens Sub Forum
Bandcamp |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
paugui
Joined: Jun 28, 2008 Posts: 555 Location: Marinha Grande, Portugal / Oslo, Norway
Audio files: 4
G2 patch files: 37
|
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2011 5:36 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Is that book available as PDF, or it's only possible to buy it?
If I get a Capybara 360, can I use it with my iMac G5, or do I need a PCI board?
Also, is it worth getting one without any expansion?
Is it still powerful enough, or will I feel I need more power as soon as I start learning how to use it?
And what's the current going price for one?
Another thing that worries me is the learning curve...
I am studying abroad, so I don't get too much time at home to use my equipment...
Will it still be worth getting one considering this?
I'd guess the Eventides are not that easy to use either, so if there is a nice set of patches available, it would probably still be a better choice... |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
robsol
Stream Operator
Joined: Apr 24, 2009 Posts: 2492 Location: Bristol UK
Audio files: 495
|
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2011 6:03 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
I don't think there is a pdf available, maybe you can find the book second hand somewhere.
I am pretty sure your iMac will be ok, but I don't know for sure. I do think that you will soon want to expand it though if you get a Capy... It is very demading on your time unless you are already very stable in programming, maths, DSP, synthesis and so on... Trust me, any Eventide is fairly easy to use compared to Kyma.
Remember that the type of environment that Kyma offers also is roughly available in Supercollider, Reaktor, Max, Plogue etc... For much less money, if that is the way you want to go.
As for prices, I'm really don't know... I see them around but don't remember any prices offhand. My advice would be to wait, and get a Paca at least, when you can afford one.
You know what they say... Either invest your money or invest your time, not both at once. Well, I wasn't listening. _________________ Muied Lumens Sub Forum
Bandcamp |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
paugui
Joined: Jun 28, 2008 Posts: 555 Location: Marinha Grande, Portugal / Oslo, Norway
Audio files: 4
G2 patch files: 37
|
Posted: Mon Aug 22, 2011 7:19 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
But are those other languages as powerful?
And are there many algorithms available for them too?
Cause that could be an interesting idea too...
However, since the learning curve is step, I was wondering if it would be really worth getting into them if I plan to get a Kyma...
Wouldn't it be better to learn how to use one properly instead?
And if that's the case, I'd guess the Kyma is the best investment, considering also the computational power given by the hardware and the community / costumer support, despite being paid, right?
Also, since you said it would be wiser to wait and get a newer system, is it possible to come up with the same kind of quality from the Nord Modulars, or is it completely different?
When I check new presets from this forum, I usually notice that I there is a lot I don't understand yet, so I'm wondering if it wouldn't be indeed a better idea to explore more my modulars (especially since I have 2 G2Xs a G1 expanded and a MM) and when the Paca or Pacarana drops in price, or when I find a cheap Capybara, I try to get it...
Thanks again for your help
Paulo |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
robsol
Stream Operator
Joined: Apr 24, 2009 Posts: 2492 Location: Bristol UK
Audio files: 495
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 10:29 am Post subject:
|
|
|
paugui wrote: | But are those other languages as powerful?
And are there many algorithms available for them too? |
Yes, they are powerful, and they all have hordes of algorithms. They all differ in various ways, even in sound. What they all have in common (except a few, like Scope for example) is that they all run directly in the host computer. This also means that it is easy to demo them. Puredata, Supercollider and Csound are all free, and very powerful indeed, all you need is the time to learn them.
How much time depends on how well you already know a few things... Some depend on you knowing a programming language well, others are based on a "virtual hardware" graphic approach, like the Nords for example. I would recommend that you get at least one free software and play around... What you learn in one environment will benefit you in an other. Imo Kyma is very flexible and will let you do things in a lot of different ways. There are obviously things which are easier to script than to set up graphically,and I would say that Kyma comes from a software philosophy, in that it does not resemble a hardware modular really.
Quote: | However, since the learning curve is step, I was wondering if it would be really worth getting into them if I plan to get a Kyma...
Wouldn't it be better to learn how to use one properly instead?
And if that's the case, I'd guess the Kyma is the best investment, considering also the computational power given by the hardware and the community / costumer support, despite being paid, right? |
One area where Kyma differs a lot from, say, Reaktor is that there are a lot fewer "Sound Banks" available. You won't find vast amounts of replicas of famous gear (although a couple exist of course) and it does not seem that this is the philosophy of the system. It is rather a creative sound design platform where you explore your own original ideas. It is a small community and far from as active as the NI community which has a rather large amount of users.
Quote: | Also, since you said it would be wiser to wait and get a newer system, is it possible to come up with the same kind of quality from the Nord Modulars, or is it completely different? |
There are vast differences between Kyma and the Nord Modulars - for one, Kyma has more RAM and DSP power available, and a wider pallette for synthesis and processing, like sampling, FFT processing or convolution etc etc. I am very impressed by the creativity in the Nord patches I see here though. As you probably know, limitations can spark creativity as well. I don't have a Nord Modular but I have played around with the free software from Clavia and I like it. A similar approach can be found in Synthedit (free for non-commercial use), which allows you to make VSTi plugins for use in your DAW, Creamware Scope (worth considering if you are going to roll out the big cash), or Tassman, a software modular. There are lots more choices out there too.
Quote: | When I check new presets from this forum, I usually notice that I there is a lot I don't understand yet, so I'm wondering if it wouldn't be indeed a better idea to explore more my modulars (especially since I have 2 G2Xs a G1 expanded and a MM) and when the Paca or Pacarana drops in price, or when I find a cheap Capybara, I try to get it... |
There is a great deal of things I don't know yet either, but what I have or don't have does not stop me from continuing my explorations - knowing when to strike for that bargain is a skill in itself, and holding back is some times not so easy. I can't advise you on that, it is something that you learn as you go along. Making some mistakes on the way is part of the process... Exploring something in depth is always a good thing though!
Why did I chose Kyma? I was first made aware of it 15 or so years ago by a friend and have been curious about it ever since. Whatever I heard of sounds coming out of it I loved! I also like unconventional thinking and ideas... To give an example I don't want a chorus with a predictable cycling LFO, or 35 different carefully modelled vintage analog compressor models to chose from. The design philosophy is also commendable, with no fear of being different from the pack being an obvious perk in my book. I have had my periods of doubt though, and still feel like I am splashing around on the beach of a vast ocean that I will need a few lifetimes to explore. It was a conscious decision of mine to get something very flexible so that my creativity and focus would have to be stepped up a notch. Now I do not look for more things to buy, but for more things to learn. _________________ Muied Lumens Sub Forum
Bandcamp |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
paugui
Joined: Jun 28, 2008 Posts: 555 Location: Marinha Grande, Portugal / Oslo, Norway
Audio files: 4
G2 patch files: 37
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 12:06 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
I got a Scope board with 6 DSPs recently, but I still have to check how to get the Modular to work, cause the previous owner said to me it was running, but I wasn't able to run it so far...
But I thought the Scope was more similar to the G2, at least in term of interface...
Can it do similar things to Kyma, or the FFT processing and convolution are not possible (I think the modular has sampling modules, right?).
I was also thinking of expanding this system, if I am pleased with modular, but was considering it more as another tool rather than a substitute for Kyma, but given the prices of the Scope boards and the Kyma ones... it would be much cheaper just to expand my Scope system
By the way, from those languages, which one do you think is the best to start with? |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
GovernorSilver
Joined: Apr 26, 2004 Posts: 1349 Location: Washington DC Metro
G2 patch files: 1
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
paugui
Joined: Jun 28, 2008 Posts: 555 Location: Marinha Grande, Portugal / Oslo, Norway
Audio files: 4
G2 patch files: 37
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 12:11 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
GovernorSilver wrote: | BobTheDog posted several demos of his Kyma being used as a guitar processor. |
Do you have the link? |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
BobTheDog
Joined: Feb 28, 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Acoustic Interloper
Joined: Jul 07, 2007 Posts: 2067 Location: Berks County, PA
Audio files: 89
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 12:33 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
I've been using my Pacarana as an outbound effects processor with Live, partly because I don't have time to learn it soup-to-nuts before performing with it, and partly because I like to do overall arrangements and mixing in Live.
So far I have been tweaking patches that come with it (so-called "Sounds") rather than designing them from scratch, and using them as outbound FX. This includes sounds synthesized by the Java MIDI library, live banjo and guitar samples that have already been processed somewhat in Live, whatever audio stream I feel like running through Kyma.
I am extremely impressed with the sound quality. I don't know if I would have spent the money, but I got it via a grant, and am glad I did. If I had to pay out of pocket, I'd probably go with SuperCollider for starters. More mandatory programming, but I am a programmer. SC patches I have heard indicate excellent quality of the ugens, and it can do FFT, etc. Also, I don't see much load on my MacBook Pro dual core CPU, and if you are running multiple audio processing programs, then taking advantage of 4 or more cores should be automatic without multithreaded audio engines. I suspect multicores will cut into Kyma's CPU argument, but the sound quality is a good argument for getting one. _________________ When the stream is deep
my wild little dog frolics,
when shallow, she drinks. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
robsol
Stream Operator
Joined: Apr 24, 2009 Posts: 2492 Location: Bristol UK
Audio files: 495
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 12:37 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
paugui wrote: |
By the way, from those languages, which one do you think is the best to start with? |
Well, Supercollider is partly based on smalltalk, so there would be familiar elements if you move to Kyma later. Puredata/Max is by far the most flexible/impenetrable. In some ways, learning a pure programming language, like Squeak (smalltalk) would be a benefit is you are sure you want to use Kyma at some point. According to somebody I know, if you want to impress the chicks, C is the only option. _________________ Muied Lumens Sub Forum
Bandcamp |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
paugui
Joined: Jun 28, 2008 Posts: 555 Location: Marinha Grande, Portugal / Oslo, Norway
Audio files: 4
G2 patch files: 37
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 1:18 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
BobTheDog wrote: | http://electro-music.com/forum/post-244368.html#244368
That is a little walkthrough I did.
Don't get a Kyma system if you want fast results though, I think it takes years to learn. |
Cool
The processed sound is pretty cool indeed.
I'm not expecting fast results, guess it is much more complicated than the Nord Modulars, which I understand but looking at some complex patches in here, I see I still have lots to learn.
What I expect is, using algorithms that are already prepared, I can do some really good processing with it.
I hope with those algorithms it's possible to produce something nice without waiting for too long, but I get that to build everything from scratch will take a lot more time... |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
paugui
Joined: Jun 28, 2008 Posts: 555 Location: Marinha Grande, Portugal / Oslo, Norway
Audio files: 4
G2 patch files: 37
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 1:21 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Acoustic Interloper wrote: | I've been using my Pacarana as an outbound effects processor with Live, partly because I don't have time to learn it soup-to-nuts before performing with it, and partly because I like to do overall arrangements and mixing in Live.
So far I have been tweaking patches that come with it (so-called "Sounds") rather than designing them from scratch, and using them as outbound FX. This includes sounds synthesized by the Java MIDI library, live banjo and guitar samples that have already been processed somewhat in Live, whatever audio stream I feel like running through Kyma.
I am extremely impressed with the sound quality. I don't know if I would have spent the money, but I got it via a grant, and am glad I did. If I had to pay out of pocket, I'd probably go with SuperCollider for starters. More mandatory programming, but I am a programmer. SC patches I have heard indicate excellent quality of the ugens, and it can do FFT, etc. Also, I don't see much load on my MacBook Pro dual core CPU, and if you are running multiple audio processing programs, then taking advantage of 4 or more cores should be automatic without multithreaded audio engines. I suspect multicores will cut into Kyma's CPU argument, but the sound quality is a good argument for getting one. |
Money is the reason why I'm only thinking about an older model...
I guess with a lower cost it might be something interesting to explore, but I guess I'll try SuperCollider first then
By the way, if you have some demos of the processing stuff you've been doing with it, I'd love to take a listen |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
paugui
Joined: Jun 28, 2008 Posts: 555 Location: Marinha Grande, Portugal / Oslo, Norway
Audio files: 4
G2 patch files: 37
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 1:24 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Muied Lumens wrote: | paugui wrote: |
By the way, from those languages, which one do you think is the best to start with? |
Well, Supercollider is partly based on smalltalk, so there would be familiar elements if you move to Kyma later. Puredata/Max is by far the most flexible/impenetrable. In some ways, learning a pure programming language, like Squeak (smalltalk) would be a benefit is you are sure you want to use Kyma at some point. According to somebody I know, if you want to impress the chicks, C is the only option. |
Mathematica is a cool language too, despite a bit buggy
I have actually done a program to create a synth based in chaotic waveforms, given by the Lorenz attractor and so on.
It produced some nice waveforms, especially using FM to it
Can try to check where I have some demos of it, if anyone is interested.
The programming language on Kyma is completely different from C?
I learnt C and C++, so if it can make the learning process faster, it would be a plus to learn those languages
By the way, since you mentioned before the Kyma is able to do convolution, can it use that method to produce reverbs, like the Yamaha S-REV1 and Sony DRE-S777 did? |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
robsol
Stream Operator
Joined: Apr 24, 2009 Posts: 2492 Location: Bristol UK
Audio files: 495
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 1:36 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
paugui wrote: |
The programming language on Kyma is completely different from C?
I learnt C and C++, so if it can make the learning process faster, it would be a plus to learn those languages |
Yes there are differences, but I am not a C or C++ programmer so I don't really know what the big differences are between them and Smalltalk.
Quote: | By the way, since you mentioned before the Kyma is able to do convolution, can it use that method to produce reverbs, like the Yamaha S-REV1 and Sony DRE-S777 did? |
Yes, but worth mentioning is that the convolution in Kyma (called cross-synthesis) is very power hungry, and I can get longer impulses in my PC than I can in my Paca. An other thing worth mentioning is that you can capture impulses in real time, as you are playing.
Your chaotic waves sound cool! Post some audio! _________________ Muied Lumens Sub Forum
Bandcamp |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Acoustic Interloper
Joined: Jul 07, 2007 Posts: 2067 Location: Berks County, PA
Audio files: 89
|
Posted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 1:45 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
paugui wrote: |
I guess with a lower cost it might be something interesting to explore, but I guess I'll try SuperCollider first then |
There is an excellent SC book out this year, I highly recommend it.
Quote: | By the way, if you have some demos of the processing stuff you've been doing with it, I'd love to take a listen |
It's really tightly integrated into other signal processing I am doing with Java, Ableton Live, StringStudio soft synthesizers and live sampled sound, nothing I can post stand-alone. But, I'll keep it in mind for the future. If you check the first performance of this event on radio.electro-music.com, you'll hear it in the mix in a few places -- where discrete sounds fade out into a sort of wash that uses stereo cross-channel coupling to wash out the sound, later another effect that adds turbulence to a sound, and another that adds granulation. I am really just getting started with Kyma. _________________ When the stream is deep
my wild little dog frolics,
when shallow, she drinks. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
paugui
Joined: Jun 28, 2008 Posts: 555 Location: Marinha Grande, Portugal / Oslo, Norway
Audio files: 4
G2 patch files: 37
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
robsol
Stream Operator
Joined: Apr 24, 2009 Posts: 2492 Location: Bristol UK
Audio files: 495
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
robsol
Stream Operator
Joined: Apr 24, 2009 Posts: 2492 Location: Bristol UK
Audio files: 495
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
ikarus
Joined: Oct 04, 2009 Posts: 21 Location: uk
|
Posted: Sat Jan 14, 2012 5:54 am Post subject:
Re: Kyma as an effects processor |
|
|
Hi paulo
i have both kyma and h8000 on and off over the years and they are different worlds.I tried many patches in kyma that i made for the h8000 using large reverb and picth shifting combined with delay and the results are very different.I dont think kyma has the tone or depth of the H8000's sound at all , an eventide will always have a certain sound and Kyma also.
For me Kyma 's power is in resynthesis and cross synthesis and convolution etc and all that side , fragmenting , granular etc.
H8000 is just a very high end multi fx which can combine multiple reverbs of the highest quality with pitching and everything else in between in 1 patch !
They cant replace each other.
Of course that does not mean Kyma isnt a great external fx processor , its great on a send and return of a mixer or 2 and i do love its own reverbs and delays etc which have a character of their own. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
paugui
Joined: Jun 28, 2008 Posts: 555 Location: Marinha Grande, Portugal / Oslo, Norway
Audio files: 4
G2 patch files: 37
|
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2016 8:17 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Ok, so after all this time, I ended up buying a Symbolic Sounds Capybara 320 (fully expanded in terms of DSP)!
Unfortunately, customs seem to be a bit slow and I'm still waiting for it anxiously...
In the meanwhile, I also ended up getting an Eventide H3000D/SX (plus a ModFactor and a Space, despite I ended up selling my Eventide HM80 that broke down...), some Lexicon PCMs (a PCM60, two PCM70 and a PCM91), plus an Ensoniq DP/4+ and some other cheaper effect units in my setup, so I felt it would be relevant to revive this thread!
Starting with what Ikarus was mentioning (and sorry I didn't reply...), my point with this thread was not to understand if the Kyma could emulate accurately the sound of other effects processor, but rather understand if it could provide effects in the same ballpark as bigger units, despite different character.
From what I could get, Kyma can indeed give me effects with top quality, and since my unit is fully expanded in terms of DSP, I would expect it to be good at convolution reverbs as well (hope this isn't a wrong assumption...), which is definitely an area I'm completely lacking...
Since I don't have much space available in the studio right now, I was starting to think about getting rid of quite some lower-end equipment and get one of those top reverb units (I already have two Roland R880s, but was thinking one extra flavour could be nice).
The original plan was to drop the Lexicon PCM91 and Lexicon PCM60, plus some other lower-end devices, for a Lexicon 480L, but unfortunately the guy I had a deal with decided to give up on it (despite I had even paid for it... Fortunately I got my money back...).
Since that deal won't be done, and it probably won't be easy to find another one for a nice price (and I have also been thinking about maintenance issues...), I started thinking on other options that could be interesting for my setup, just to realise that my soon to arrive (I hope!) Kyma is probably the key for the answer!
I haven't tried the Kyma yet, but I remember talking with a guy that was selling one and he told me to him the Kyma had the best reverbs he heard (and he had a Lexicon PCM90 as well), so I'm quite hoping for it to be a great unit for reverbs (also because of convolution as well).
So, my expectation is that if I want to complement my Roland R880s and the Symbolic Sounds Kyma, I should probably look for an older reverb, like a Lexicon 224, rather than a Lexicon 480L and other more modern units.
I am not looking for realism, as most of you that heard my concerts here are aware of, just pure quality of sound and diversity.
What would be your suggestions?
Thanks in advance
Paulo |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
robsol
Stream Operator
Joined: Apr 24, 2009 Posts: 2492 Location: Bristol UK
Audio files: 495
|
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 6:34 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Hi Paulo
I wouldn't say that Kyma is specifically great for reverbs unless you are prepared to roll your own. That is not as hard as it sounds as there are lots of prototypes (base modules) to get you going.
Kyma does seem to be more of a tool that adapts to your needs - unless your needs are very specific that is. Having said that, its strong points are to do with resynthesis and experimental sound design, and can be surprisingly limited in some ways. The basic delay module is a long shout from Eventide H8000 delays in terms of control over details and personally I don't think the Kyma stock reverbs are a match for the Eventide rack reverbs - including the H3000 in some cases. But as I said you can always program your own.
In my little opinion.
As for the convolution (in Kyma), it seems a little bit resource hungry compared to others I have tried. But it is more interesting for sonic experimentation - not nescessarily for reverbs.
I am not a huge fan of the H3000 "sound" - I like it but I prefer the more transparent later rack models, and would love to have a go at their underlying modular structure. The reverbs in the Orville are the best I have heard when it comes to unrealistic spaces. Anywhere.
Kyma does not even come close to the quality of the pitch shifters and other more "traditional" effects in the Eventides in my opinion. On the other hand, the eventides do not do any FFT type effects or deep synthesis features. Kyma is more flexible and can do more if you are into programming. Eventides have hoardes of presets ready for use.
They complement each other well I'd say.
The DP/4 is great as well - lots of very useable effects in it from distortions to flangers and weird spaces. Chaining effects and applying a bit of internal feedback is really fun. Lexicons are staple effects but I have much less experience with them so I can't really tell you much there... _________________ Muied Lumens Sub Forum
Bandcamp |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|