Author |
Message |
bachus
Joined: Feb 29, 2004 Posts: 2922 Location: Up in that tree over there.
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 8:41 am Post subject:
|
|
|
seraph wrote: | well...if you are too open-minded your brains will fall out
|
Not to worry, This happened to me some time ago and no one even noticed. _________________ The question is not whether they can talk or reason, but whether they can suffer. -- Jeremy Bentham |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
flowersniffer7
Joined: Nov 17, 2006 Posts: 53 Location: Allentown PA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 12:42 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
bachus wrote: | flowersniffer7 wrote: | ... Its all about the perception and those who are open minded enough don't use such words to base their judgement on, they listen and say I like, or I dislike and thats it... |
If one is both open minded enough and has some self awareness one might add descriptive (not judgmental explanations) e.g. "I did not like it because there are a lot of bagpipes used in the piece and I dislike bagpipes." |
This is true... However the point is really that any connotation towards likeing or disliking is subjective and the point I was trying to make is that is that giving an entire "genre," of music a label of good/bad will be completely your relative opinion on the matter and not really based on "facts." Even in the case of "I don't like bagpipes..." you are judging the sound of bagpipes...
Not saying judging is necessarily a bad process, because it is one we will all inevitably do with every sound we hear, but thats precisely what we do when we classify music. _________________ analoguemind.zy8.org |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
bachus
Joined: Feb 29, 2004 Posts: 2922 Location: Up in that tree over there.
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:16 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
flowersniffer7 wrote: | Even in the case of "I don't like bagpipes..." you are judging the sound of bagpipes... | Absolutely. My suggestion does not change it from a subjective judgement to an objective analysis. It just gives additional useful information to the reader. I had a friend who really liked bagpipes. He would have likely taken the example as a positive assessment of the music.
Really meant as no more than a related digression. I think it has more relevance to criticism than the issue you raise. Thus I digress...sigh... _________________ The question is not whether they can talk or reason, but whether they can suffer. -- Jeremy Bentham |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
bachus
Joined: Feb 29, 2004 Posts: 2922 Location: Up in that tree over there.
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 4:33 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Antimon wrote: |
I'm a bit out of my depth, since english isn't my natural language, but at the same time it's a bit enlightening when you try to translate and realize that it works differently in other languages.
/Stefan |
Uh.. I think you do better at it than I, and it's my native tongue. You are straight forward and clear, I tend to be metaphorical to the point of incoherence, or dare I say...noise? _________________ The question is not whether they can talk or reason, but whether they can suffer. -- Jeremy Bentham |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
seraph
Editor
Joined: Jun 21, 2003 Posts: 12398 Location: Firenze, Italy
Audio files: 33
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 5:02 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
bachus wrote: | I tend to be metaphorical to the point of incoherence, or dare I say...noise? |
keep up the good...noise _________________ homepage - blog - forum - youtube
Quote: | Don't die with your music still in you - Wayne Dyer |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
renevanderwouden
Joined: Feb 25, 2006 Posts: 186 Location: Gouda (NL)
Audio files: 8
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
elektro80
Site Admin
Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 2:18 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
renevanderwouden wrote: | Noise is the opposite of harmony ? At least I thought this is the case. |
Well... I don´t think it works that way. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
renevanderwouden
Joined: Feb 25, 2006 Posts: 186 Location: Gouda (NL)
Audio files: 8
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
elektro80
Site Admin
Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 2:29 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Indeed.. well..
I once walked unknowingly into the roundingoff of a very gay Liberace lookalike contest in a pub in... was it Umeå, Sweden? One of those cities.. anyways.. pink noise.. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
renevanderwouden
Joined: Feb 25, 2006 Posts: 186 Location: Gouda (NL)
Audio files: 8
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
elektro80
Site Admin
Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 2:38 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
That new cute little Zoom thingie with stereo mics and whatnot! _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
play
Joined: Feb 08, 2004 Posts: 489 Location: behind the mustard
Audio files: 2
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 1:26 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
elektro80 wrote: | yup.. true. Actually I wrote a piece of music once which picks up on this effect.. well.. my idea was exploring if memory will play you a trick or two.. The piece is called "Blinded By Memory" and is basically about if the perception of structures, events and microdetail will be perceived differently by the audience based on previous experiences. I got the idea based on a visual experience. The full title is "Blinded by Memory - The City That Never Was".
:shock: I suddenly realized using a concept like this for a piece of music is pretty geeky. Hmm.. seems like I have misplaced my pocket protector somewhere... |
Not geeky at all. It's totally cool. It's the basic idea behind whole genres of repetive music like hard techno. Lots of people just hear "dum-dum-dum-dum" and think only ravers on drugs could find it interesting but when you open your ear a bit you find the experience of the sound changes over time even though the actual sound just repeats. It's not really ground breaking to say that our moods affect our perception but it is interesting to exploit that effect to create music that encourages self-reflection or a "tuning-in" to our own experience. Quite different than the view of music as a narrative. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
play
Joined: Feb 08, 2004 Posts: 489 Location: behind the mustard
Audio files: 2
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
elektro80
Site Admin
Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 2:02 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
hugs _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
elektro80
Site Admin
Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 6:00 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
play wrote: | Not geeky at all. It's totally cool. It's the basic idea behind whole genres of repetive music like hard techno. Lots of people just hear "dum-dum-dum-dum" and think only ravers on drugs could find it interesting but when you open your ear a bit you find the experience of the sound changes over time even though the actual sound just repeats. |
Very true. My approach is not unique at all. That being said, I do think it is interesting to explore components like melody and phrases as well as interacting polyphonic lines. Thinking about silly stuff like how short or how long can a melodic phrase be, can a melody be played implicitly but still never be heard, is it possible to shift phrasing which is perceived as tonal melody into rythmic patterns alone.. you know.. I find this interesting. Whenever I have written something based on some old formulae I´ve learned way back I tend to feel the music is not mine but someone elses. Silly I know, but life is too short for writing someone elses music. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
play
Joined: Feb 08, 2004 Posts: 489 Location: behind the mustard
Audio files: 2
|
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 11:59 am Post subject:
|
|
|
well then, I grant you your geekines :) Another fun thing to explore is the limit of what sounds can be used melodically.
There is some great stuff in this vein put out by the perlon label (http://www.perlon.net/). Their stuff ranges from goofy/lush to extremely minimalistic but with a lot of depth. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
elektro80
Site Admin
Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2007 8:12 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
play wrote: | Another fun thing to explore is the limit of what sounds can be used melodically. |
I don´t think there are any real limits here. It is not hard to construct gestures and patterns out of sounds that aren´t strictly tonal. Related is of course the fact that schemes for repetetion/structuring of melodic sections can be messed with a lot. And then there is interaction between layers of voices. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
play
Joined: Feb 08, 2004 Posts: 489 Location: behind the mustard
Audio files: 2
|
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:56 am Post subject:
|
|
|
I didn't mean to imply so much that there is a limit, although I think there are limits within the individual language of a particular piece. I guess I'm refering to the use of percussive or highly complex-timbred sounds to create melodies that sort of grow inside the listener's mind. Not so much messing with the pitch of a sound as exploiting the relationship between melody and rythm to create melodic lines that exist as a by product of rythmic variations. This effect is usually intensified through repetition. Creating loops that do this effectively is, for me, a process of pushing against the limits of what a sound can mean through layering and repetition. (sort of like what you're saying) |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
kijjaz
Joined: Sep 20, 2004 Posts: 765 Location: bangkok, thailand
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Wed Feb 28, 2007 5:00 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
for me, noise is what i forgot to listen to .. in the past.
but i might forget to listen to them now and in the future hahahahaa.
sometimes there are also something in life i didn't pay attention to in the past.
and i might forget about them now and in the future also -_-".. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
lebenspuls
Joined: Aug 21, 2006 Posts: 31 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:59 am Post subject:
|
|
|
elektro80 wrote: | play wrote: | Another fun thing to explore is the limit of what sounds can be used melodically. |
I don´t think there are any real limits here. It is not hard to construct gestures and patterns out of sounds that aren´t strictly tonal. Related is of course the fact that schemes for repetetion/structuring of melodic sections can be messed with a lot. And then there is interaction between layers of voices. |
Just found this interesting discussion and want to share some experiences...
I would go even a step further. If you listen to pure white or pink noise for a longer time and relax as deep as possible you will start to "hear" structures. I do this sometimes in workshops and it amazes me what people start to "hear". Another exercise I formed for myself is:
I created a patch in Max/MSP which generates pure sine-waves from a pure random function and listened to it every day for a few minutes. Interesting how different the "atmosphere" of these small "generative improvisation" appears to me every time. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Antimon
Joined: Jan 18, 2005 Posts: 4145 Location: Sweden
Audio files: 371
G2 patch files: 100
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:14 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
lebenspuls wrote: | elektro80 wrote: | play wrote: | Another fun thing to explore is the limit of what sounds can be used melodically. |
I don´t think there are any real limits here. It is not hard to construct gestures and patterns out of sounds that aren´t strictly tonal. Related is of course the fact that schemes for repetetion/structuring of melodic sections can be messed with a lot. And then there is interaction between layers of voices. |
Just found this interesting discussion and want to share some experiences...
I would go even a step further. If you listen to pure white or pink noise for a longer time and relax as deep as possible you will start to "hear" structures. I do this sometimes in workshops and it amazes me what people start to "hear". Another exercise I formed for myself is:
I created a patch in Max/MSP which generates pure sine-waves from a pure random function and listened to it every day for a few minutes. Interesting how different the "atmosphere" of these small "generative improvisation" appears to me every time. |
Yes - this is an interesting approach. I believe that different people experience music in individual ways that may differ on a deep level. A bit like people often have a hard time agreeing on what colours look like (I like to call the surface of the Trivial Pursuit board green, but many disagree with me, calling it blue). Even though we develop a language for music and sounds ("warm", "full", "glitchy" etc), there can be a lot of misunderstandings about it - opinion A not obviously not more valid than opinion B. This becomes more apparent when dealing with music that deviates from well-established rules.
/Stefan _________________ Antimon's Window
@soundcloud @Flattr home - you can't explain music |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
simioliolio
Joined: Feb 28, 2007 Posts: 6 Location: england
|
Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:11 am Post subject:
|
|
|
yeah totally, humans are complicated. its a good job really, otherwise things would be well dull.
ive just read this entire thread and found it very interesting to hear all the different opinions and historic references. the book "audio culture" http://www.amazon.com/Audio-Culture-Readings-Modern-Music/dp/0826416152 has got some fantastic discussions and explanations involving all popular contributors to the concept of noise, not to mention aother fields of musical philosophy. it really changes the way you think about music, especially about noise, as it identifies a large number of artists' experiments and ideas.
if you are dealing with audio in the analog domain, there is noise, as all particles vibrate above absolute zero, and these vibrations are perceived as 'noise'.
if you are dealing with audio in the digital domain, there is noise, as the incoming analog signal (already containing noise) is subject to quantisation error, and other noise-adding treatments.
John cage went into an anechoic chamber inside a studio, and asked the engineer if he could sit inside to see if he could hear silence. He went in, and after half an hour came out explaining that the room is not silent, and that he could hear a high pitched and low pitched 'noise'. the engineer explained that the high pitched sound was his nervous system and the low pitched sound was his blood circulation.
so everything has 'noise', it is natural part of our lives, so how can we label it as an un-wanted artifact, when it is everywhere!
I love listening to noise. the first 5 seconds are difficult, but when the brain adapts, and the noise doesn't correclate with the way that our ears and brain perceive it, it is an awesome experience, that changes daily. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
jmcdaniel_ee
Joined: Mar 22, 2007 Posts: 18 Location: SW Louisiana, US
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 2:21 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
There is the scientific definition of noise as in non-pitched sound, or sound of an undetermined pitch.
Then there is the relative/artistc/purpose-concerned definition of noise. In this case I usually compare noise to the dirt/soil example: soil grows plants and supports walking, etc. Dirt is misplaced soil. If you compare noise with dirt in this example, I don't know what you compare soil to. Inteded sound, I guess. If you're talking about using actual unpitched sound in an intentional way, then it's purposeful sound of undetermined pitch.
Try using the term in a sentence. As in: "Johnny decided to fade into the song a breif swell of white-purposeful-sound-of-an-undertermined-pitch." It has a nice ring to it. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Digiton
Joined: Jul 27, 2006 Posts: 146 Location: Brooklyn
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 3:21 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
just to head back 3 years to the start of the thread being about the futurist movement, the futurist artists (visual) are incredible as well. The whole movement was hell bent on breaking down artistic barriers, so much so it's manifestos can seem miltaristic in their intensity and the painter/sculptor boccioni died in combat...um, so here are some links to his work, quite famous yall probably seen it before but its dang hot!
http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/fnart/art/20th/sculpture/boccioni01.jpg
http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/fnart/art/20th/sculpture/boccioni02.jpg
You can almost "see" things like granular synthesis and time stretching applied to the 3d form, no?
and in terms of "noise" (white pink brown) being unpitched sound thats true, a pitched sound is a periodic waveform (most basic being sine, square etc.) and noise is aperiodic...so in a sense, calling certain music "noise music" is from a scientific standpoint quite correct! _________________ Lets get it! |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|