Author |
Message |
JAMESveeder
Joined: Nov 16, 2010 Posts: 34 Location: tucson
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
v-un-v
Janitor


Joined: May 16, 2005 Posts: 8932 Location: Birmingham, England, UK
Audio files: 11
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:07 pm Post subject:
Re: passive ring modulator |
 |
|
JAMESveeder wrote: | Is there any way that I can prevent this from happening?
|
No.
The only way around this, is to build a better ring modulator.  _________________ ACHTUNG!
ALLES TURISTEN UND NONTEKNISCHEN LOOKENPEEPERS!
DAS KOMPUTERMASCHINE IST NICHT FÜR DER GEFINGERPOKEN UND MITTENGRABEN! ODERWISE IST EASY TO SCHNAPPEN DER SPRINGENWERK, BLOWENFUSEN UND POPPENCORKEN MIT SPITZENSPARKSEN.
IST NICHT FÜR GEWERKEN BEI DUMMKOPFEN. DER RUBBERNECKEN SIGHTSEEREN KEEPEN DAS COTTONPICKEN HÄNDER IN DAS POCKETS MUSS.
ZO RELAXEN UND WATSCHEN DER BLINKENLICHTEN. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24461 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 297
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Sat Nov 27, 2010 1:13 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Using a sine oscillator instead of a square would get rid of some of the bleed through.
Remaining bleed would then caused by transformer dual winding not being perfectly equal and diode tolerances _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
JAMESveeder
Joined: Nov 16, 2010 Posts: 34 Location: tucson
|
Posted: Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:26 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
o.O
i have NO idea what i've done, but i've gotten it to start taking ANY two different pitches and it ring modulates them after I soldered this together.
for example, if i use a synth and I'm using two oscillators and I change the frequency of one, it RMs both oscillators together, even if it's coming in from one input... very interesting sounds coming out of this...
would anyone know why this is happening?
here's the video of what happens: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aI5BbLznuD8[/url] |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
emdot_ambient
Joined: Nov 22, 2009 Posts: 667 Location: Frederick, MD
|
Posted: Tue Nov 30, 2010 2:43 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
According to the CGS info for their Real Ring Modulator you can limit bleed through by using diodes that are matched for voltage drop. It won't eliminate the issue, but limit it to some degree.
It also says, "a compressor-expander could help if better suppression is required." But I'm not really sure exactly how one would implement that.
Essentially what you described in the OP is normal for this circuit, and is probably the biggest reason this type of circuit has largely been abandoned in favor of four quadrant multipliers, which are still called Ring Modulators, albeit erroneously. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
TheAncientOne

Joined: Dec 26, 2006 Posts: 144 Location: United Kingdom
|
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 3:30 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
The lower the forward voltage of the diodes, the less signal distortion you will get. Most ring modulators tend to use Germanium diodes. My favourites were the Mullard 0A5 gold-bonded diodes, (for that added mojo). Any Germanium signal diode will do. For a more modern touch, I been meaning to try some schottky diodes.
I've got loads of Schottky's if you want to send me an address I'll post a couple of sets in return for the postage.
||\/||ike _________________ Mike |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Top Top

Joined: Feb 02, 2010 Posts: 266 Location: California
|
Posted: Tue Dec 07, 2010 3:44 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I've built this type of ring modulator and minimized bleedthrough by having a volume control on the inputs. I turn it down low enough that I don't hear any bleedthrough of the carrier, but still hear ring modulated sound on the output. With both volume controls set correctly, I have little or no bleedthrough.
I used silicon diodes when I built it, but have actually been meaning to replace them with some geraniums, which I now have. _________________ ∆ A.M.P. ESOTERIC ELECTRONICS ∆ |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|