Author |
Message |
doobedy
Joined: Jan 12, 2009 Posts: 19 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 2:08 pm Post subject:
Troubleshooting Heathkit Analog Trainer Oscillator Bleed? |
 |
|
Hello!
I just bought a Heathkit Analog Trainer on Ebay, much like this one:
I built up a CGS 52 wave folder to test it out, but when I plug the power in I get really bad oscillator bleed happening from the power supply.
I checked the four electrolytic caps, one was bad, I replaced them all, but it didn't fix the problem. Now, what I really can't figure out is why the position of the voltage pots affects the loudness of the bleed. I can actually make it go away entirely if I get + and - in just the right positions. Not far apart, either, like 12v versus 13v. I checked the pots with a DMM and the resistance seems to sweep smoothly through the range.
Here is a link to the schematic:
http://www.heathkit.nu/ET-3100_schematic_1600.jpg You can see the 10uf and 1000uf capacitors I replaced.
Any hints would be appreciated, qs my troubleshooting skills are nearly non-existent, and I'd like to be able to use it without disconnecting the function generator  |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
RF

Joined: Mar 23, 2007 Posts: 1502 Location: Northern Minnesota, USA
Audio files: 28
|
Posted: Fri May 29, 2009 8:07 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I think you might need some power supply decoupling caps in there.
Try some .01 ceramics to ground on the power supply circuit, from the fixed + 15 and - 15 volt lines and also after the adjustable voltage regulation.
Here's a nifty article on decoupling caps
http://www.intersil.com/data/an/an1325.pdf
good luck - hope that does it for you.
bruce _________________ www.sdiy.org/rfeng
"I want to make these sounds that go wooo-wooo-ah-woo-woo.”
(Herb Deutsch to Bob Moog ~1963) |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
doobedy
Joined: Jan 12, 2009 Posts: 19 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 1:04 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
RF wrote: | I think you might need some power supply decoupling caps in there.
Try some .01 ceramics to ground on the power supply circuit, from the fixed + 15 and - 15 volt lines and also after the adjustable voltage regulation.
Here's a nifty article on decoupling caps
http://www.intersil.com/data/an/an1325.pdf
good luck - hope that does it for you.
bruce |
I tried that on my breadboard, I should have mentioned that in my original post, wth .022uf ceramic capacitors. Just from +/- rails to ground, and it didn't seem to do anything at all. I did it right next to where the power was coming in, and straight to ground. I'm not saying thats equivalent, but shouldn't it have helped a little?
The bleed is so loud that I can't imagine it's working correctly. I can just take ground and + or - straight out and the function generator is audible at all listening levels through the psu.
I really don't understand how it goes away completely at different voltage/potentiometer levels. If the +/- is coming out of the rectifier diodes, are the 10uf and 1000uf not doing anything to help? Is that where I should try the smaller caps as well, right after the diodes, and then right before the output connector? I'm assuming right before output would be somewhat equivalent to doing it where it comes in on the breadboard.
Hrmph. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Tim Stinchcombe

Joined: Dec 07, 2008 Posts: 26 Location: Cheltenham, Glos, UK
|
Posted: Sun May 31, 2009 1:07 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hi doobedy,
I'm hardly an expert on power supplies, but it looks to me that that design is just asking for trouble! Since the signal generator is powered from the (supposed) fixed +/-15V 'references' at the two zener diodes (ZD101/102), then any fluctuation in current from the signal generator (and I imagine there is quite a lot!) will cause a fluctuation at the zeners, despite the 10u caps there, and even though they are going to be on the 'steep' bit of their curve. This fluctuating voltage is then used directly as the reference point for the variable supply (at pots R106/116), so it looks like it gets straight onto the variable rails.
Increasing C102/112 looks like it should help, but you might need to go many times bigger, perhaps 470u, or even a 1000u. I'd be tempted with a more radical approach, like completely disabling the sig gen when not needed, or even introducing another 220ohm/15V zener in parallel with the existing to power the sig gen from, and so better isolate that from the reference used for the variable supply.
I'm guessing that when you manage to make it go away that you have just come across some 'sweet spot' where everything plus and minus just happens to cancel out!?
Tim _________________ http://www.timstinchcombe.co.uk |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
doobedy
Joined: Jan 12, 2009 Posts: 19 Location: Los Angeles
|
Posted: Sun May 31, 2009 3:27 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Tim Stinchcombe wrote: | Hi doobedy,
I'm hardly an expert on power supplies, but it looks to me that that design is just asking for trouble! Since the signal generator is powered from the (supposed) fixed +/-15V 'references' at the two zener diodes (ZD101/102), then any fluctuation in current from the signal generator (and I imagine there is quite a lot!) will cause a fluctuation at the zeners, despite the 10u caps there, and even though they are going to be on the 'steep' bit of their curve. This fluctuating voltage is then used directly as the reference point for the variable supply (at pots R106/116), so it looks like it gets straight onto the variable rails.
Increasing C102/112 looks like it should help, but you might need to go many times bigger, perhaps 470u, or even a 1000u. I'd be tempted with a more radical approach, like completely disabling the sig gen when not needed, or even introducing another 220ohm/15V zener in parallel with the existing to power the sig gen from, and so better isolate that from the reference used for the variable supply.
I'm guessing that when you manage to make it go away that you have just come across some 'sweet spot' where everything plus and minus just happens to cancel out!?
Tim |
Hi Tim,
You guessed right I think, it only happens when powering bipolar circuits. I blocked DC with a small ceramic capacitor and just listened to each side through headphones alone, and it's there at a constant rate.
I think you are right on the second count as well. Perhaps not the best design. The only thing I did that managed to really reduce the noise was a large (1000uf) cap to ground from the positive and negative rails on the output. Unfortunately I reversed the cap on the positive rail when I popped it out and put it back into the breadboard, and everything stopped working on that half of the psu . Hopefully the cracked and smoking power transistor is all I borked up.
Thanks a lot for looking at the schematic! Between your response and the manual I finally found online (from 1975) I feel like I actually have a handle with what is going on inside there. Once I replace the blown transistor I'll probably try both of your suggestions. Luckily I live next to Fry's, which has a full clone-tastic NTE aisle, and all the capacitors I want as long as I don't mind paying. Fitting a bigger one in there is another story. The original 10uf caps were rated to 80v although I'm not really sure why.
Thanks lots,
Andrew |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Tim Servo

Joined: Jul 16, 2006 Posts: 924 Location: Silicon Valley
Audio files: 11
|
Posted: Sun May 31, 2009 7:46 pm Post subject:
Troubleshooting Heathkit Analog Trainer Oscillator Bleed? |
 |
|
Too funny, I've got one of those Heathkit gizmos too. I don't use the internal oscillator, as the sine output doesn't work, but the power supply has supplied the juice for a whole bunch of Magic Smoke prototypes. It's a handy little thing, although the breadboard space in kinda limited. Also, congrats on finding the schematic! Hope you get all the bugs worked out, but I'd consider disabling the internal signal gen if nothing else.
Tim (handy little thing) Servo |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|