| Author |
Message |
fluxmonkey
Joined: Jun 24, 2005 Posts: 708 Location: cleve
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
General Elektrick

Joined: Apr 06, 2004 Posts: 254 Location: Berlin/Germany
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 15
|
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 8:01 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hey, I may take one or two depending on the price and shipping costs to germany. _________________ Best,
General Elektrick
"If something is boring after two minutes, try it for four. If still boring, then eight. Then sixteen. Then thirty-two. Eventually one discovers that it is not boring at all." --John Cage. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Danno Gee Ray
Joined: Sep 25, 2005 Posts: 1351 Location: Telford, PA USA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 8:12 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| I too could be interested. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
synthmonger
Joined: Nov 16, 2006 Posts: 578 Location: flada
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 8:14 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Have you tried using a 4070 or 4030 instead of the 4011 for "ring modulation"? I tend to like the sound of those chips more. _________________ Youtube!
modular demos!
Whacky tunes! |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
DGTom

Joined: Dec 08, 2008 Posts: 211 Location: Adelaide
Audio files: 3
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 9:49 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
& with 10 Osc.s it would make alot more sense (to me at least) to use a Quad XOR chip... 4 "ring mods" hell yes!!
The only other thing that occurs to me is the Amp / Proto section; the proto area is a little small, it would only just fit another 14/16 pin DIP right?
I think it would be neat to make the 386 amp a seperate board & expand the proto section into a nice big space for adding 1 or even 2 more ICs.
That way the amp board could have some extra bells & whistles as well, maybe a 385 for an active mixer; with summing node(s) to link into the mix sections.
Either way, its a cool idea & I'd grab a few; would make putting together little noise makers for friends alot easier, everytime I show off my lunetta / weevil I always get a request or 2. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
sizone

Joined: Jun 09, 2009 Posts: 132 Location: Honolulu HI
Audio files: 48
|
Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 12:57 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| I'm not really all that keen on the lm386 myself. Seems like every time I try to use on my regulators start getting really hot. It also just does not sound good, not very useful unless you absolutely need to drive a small speaker. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fluxmonkey
Joined: Jun 24, 2005 Posts: 708 Location: cleve
|
Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 9:57 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| synthmonger wrote: | | Have you tried using a 4070 or 4030 instead of the 4011 for "ring modulation"? I tend to like the sound of those chips more. |
i haven't... but looking quickly via google, it looks like all 3 of those have the same pinouts, so they should be interchangable?
edit: just tried both of these out, and all 3 chips seemed to work fine... i did not hear much difference myself, but i was listening thru the cruddy 386 amp...  _________________ www.fluxmonkey.com Last edited by fluxmonkey on Sun Nov 29, 2009 10:37 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fluxmonkey
Joined: Jun 24, 2005 Posts: 708 Location: cleve
|
Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 10:11 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| sizone wrote: | | I'm not really all that keen on the lm386 myself. Seems like every time I try to use on my regulators start getting really hot. It also just does not sound good, not very useful unless you absolutely need to drive a small speaker. |
the main reason for including it, as you say, is to drive a small speaker... in the workshops i've been doing, folks need to hear what they're building. but you're right, it's not that great sounding... but maybe good enuf for noize music?
the 386 also draws a lot of power, and you just skip it... but the way i have this laid out, you can link any or all of the sub-modules to a common power buss, or power any of them separately. so you could have 2 batteries, one for the 386 and another for everything else. or, you could add a power-starve option to either of the osc chips. or, you could power one oscillator with the output of one of the others. my goal was to balance flexibility and convenience...
also as mentioned, this is intended as the first in a series. obviously, this is a "voice" board; also have a sequency board and a modifier board sketched out. would welcome input or suggestions as to what you'd like to see...
b _________________ www.fluxmonkey.com |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ezekiel
Joined: Oct 17, 2009 Posts: 30 Location: Columbus Ohio
|
Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 4:23 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Cool board for a starter lunetta synth!
As for what else...
I imagine a world of sounds not based on complex, scientifically accurate circuits.
I imagine a synth exploration process that isn't solely about schematics but more about combining circuits and making music. By "music", I personally mean noise.
I imagine there could be a series of smaller boards (less than 2x2 inches) for circuits like the ones discussed throughout the lunetta forum. Here are what has caught my attention lately (some on my breadboard). This stuff takes multiple ICs and lots of wires or components (but still less complex than DIY modular synth boards). Also, a lot of these have technical details that are a little over my head:
- analog CMOS stuff using 4007, 4049, 4007
- pseudo FM and pseudo PWM
- pseudo-random digital noise generator
- clocked shift register with XOR feedback loop (4015 + 4077)
- walsh generator (perhaps with outputs for sine, triangle, saw, ramp)
- ring oscillators (multiple rings or varying lengths)
- Nu and Nv neurons (bicores)
- output filters (THIS WOULD BE REAL COOL)
- distortion, fuzz, clip effects
- envelope / VCA
- intermediate-stage mixers
- output mixer and interface to 1/4" standard, RCA line-level standard, 1/8" modular synth, headphones
- R2R networks
- routing/switching matrix?
- controller input processor (for a bunch of switches, buttons, touchpoints)?
- Wolfram's cellular automata (like Rule 30 for chaos or Rule 90 easier) using 40174 + 4070
- exploit "metastability" (see wikipedia) of these ICs
- multiple 4046 PLL / VCO
Actually, I'd be excited to see *any* PC boards for easy-to-build circuits using standard CMOS parts. Harder than just chip-to-faceplate but easier than DIY modular with its rare components and gazillion parts.
Maybe there is a way to start a set of standards with Inventor's eChuck boards and stuff others have done. With 9 volts single supply. Standard input and output impedences. Standard protection for front-panel patching. I'm talking big but that is because these are the things that I have trouble understanding and getting correct.
Further, I think it would be even cooler if someone were to have built as SMT a ton of these circuits onto one big PC board with lots of places for wiring it to a personalized panel.
Thanks for making this. Sorry for getting carried away! What you have shown is great. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
glacial23
Joined: Apr 30, 2008 Posts: 32 Location: Cleveland, OH
|
Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 5:00 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I'd be down for one of these. It would almost provide me with enough inputs for the 40181 ALU IC that I keep thinking about using in a Lunetta-ish context.  _________________ glacialcommunications.com |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Inventor
Stream Operator

Joined: Oct 13, 2007 Posts: 6221 Location: near Austin, Tx, USA
Audio files: 267
|
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 8:08 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
ezikiel, I have more of those little eChucK Lunetta breakout boards if you want to get started with those. The thing is, the value price point for any of these little boards is like $200 or more each. So if we made these designs it would take thousands and thousands of dollars to do it and we'd have to have 50 customers to make any money.
In contrast, a general purpose board can be used for anything. That's why I was so excited about the eChucK Lunetta breakout boards - it's just one design so you can build what you want.
I'm thinking of making the next batch of boards a little bit bigger to accommodate more potential designs. I'm open to suggestions there.
For the Lunetta board described here, how is the interconnect done between the different modules? Is it hard wired or configurable?
I think there is room in the Lunetta world for some Lunetta noisemakers like this board as well as the little breakout boards. They serve different purposes. I'd be interested in developing a simple noisemaker board if anyone wants me to do such a thing. What would you like me to put on it?
Les _________________ "Let's make noise for peace." - Kijjaz |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fluxmonkey
Joined: Jun 24, 2005 Posts: 708 Location: cleve
|
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 8:57 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Inventor wrote: | | For the Lunetta board described here, how is the interconnect done between the different modules? Is it hard wired or configurable? |
configurable... all 10 oscillator outputs are available separately, no hardwired connections between any of the oscillators, ringmod, or amp. right now, i have one of the prototypes wired so the 40106 is doing a sort of angry bee swarm sound while the 4093 is doing a rhythmic click track both straight and into the ringmod.... the other prototype has a powerstarve pot on the 40106 configured with low-mid audio range caps and photocels... one of which is a VLFO feeding power to the 4093 via a big electrolytic... sickness.
unlike the complete blank slate of the echuck board, these layouts will provide building blocks of some standard configurations, like oscillators or sequencers... hopefully making it easier for folks to build composite collections of circuits into flexible instruments, without locking 'em into a single design.
| Inventor wrote: | | I think there is room in the Lunetta world for some Lunetta noisemakers like this board as well as the little breakout boards. They serve different purposes. |
agreed; these projects have different goals an potentially different audiences. the first batch of these will be available in about a week.
b _________________ www.fluxmonkey.com |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Inventor
Stream Operator

Joined: Oct 13, 2007 Posts: 6221 Location: near Austin, Tx, USA
Audio files: 267
|
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 9:33 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
bbob, cool man. On future boards, you may wish to look into the screw terminals that we are using on the eChucK Lunetta breakout boards. All you have to do is put your I/O in rows and make the holes big enough. There are different style s of screw terminals available. They are a hint pricey but you don't need too many of them.
This way you can do your interconnect in a non-permanent fashion, fully configurable. If someone wants to make a more permanent arrangement (and save money on screw terminals), then s/he can just solder wires in place of the screw terminals.
Les _________________ "Let's make noise for peace." - Kijjaz |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
knittingram
Joined: Dec 01, 2009 Posts: 6 Location: Long Beach, Ca
|
Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:31 pm Post subject:
Re: LooneyBoard 1--general purpose CMOS oscillator PCB Subject description: preview--coming soon |
 |
|
| bbob wrote: |
anyone interested?
b |
Definitely! Count me in for 2 of everything you make! |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
aerogramma

Joined: Feb 27, 2008 Posts: 156 Location: Roma, Italy - London, UK
Audio files: 13
|
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 1:29 am Post subject:
Re: LooneyBoard 1--general purpose CMOS oscillator PCB Subject description: preview--coming soon |
 |
|
| bbob wrote: | I'm working on a series of CMOS/Lunetta-ish building block PCBs
-snip-
anyone interested?
b |
definetely! The building blocks approach makes a lot of sense
 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
electri-fire
Joined: Jul 26, 2006 Posts: 536 Location: Dordrecht NL
Audio files: 4
G2 patch files: 4
|
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 11:57 am Post subject:
Re: LooneyBoard 1--general purpose CMOS oscillator PCB Subject description: preview--coming soon |
 |
|
| aerogramma wrote: | | bbob wrote: | I'm working on a series of CMOS/Lunetta-ish building block PCBs
-snip-
anyone interested?
b |
definitely! The building blocks approach makes a lot of sense
 |
I like the building blocks approach. That's why I prefer inventor's e-chuck boards. One IC per board, totally modular. Easy to prepare for 14pin and 16pin CMOS.
I'm inclined to use the headers as well. But just because I have loads them in stock. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
aerogramma

Joined: Feb 27, 2008 Posts: 156 Location: Roma, Italy - London, UK
Audio files: 13
|
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:00 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I see
Personally I like a lot the idea of having a pcb already designed to be filled with all those elements you tend to do over and over (like 40106 oscillators).
takes a lot time out from repetition and gets you a lot of time back to experiment with the ... bigger picture
i'll always pay for time...
plus some of the blocks suggested here are really cool!
aero |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fluxmonkey
Joined: Jun 24, 2005 Posts: 708 Location: cleve
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
aerogramma

Joined: Feb 27, 2008 Posts: 156 Location: Roma, Italy - London, UK
Audio files: 13
|
Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 2:00 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
great stuff!
aero |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
droffset

Joined: Feb 02, 2009 Posts: 515 Location: London area
Audio files: 2
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
RF

Joined: Mar 23, 2007 Posts: 1502 Location: Northern Minnesota, USA
Audio files: 28
|
Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 10:34 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Neat project bbob!
Way to go.
bruce _________________ www.sdiy.org/rfeng
"I want to make these sounds that go wooo-wooo-ah-woo-woo.”
(Herb Deutsch to Bob Moog ~1963) |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
chutneyfarmer
Joined: Jul 21, 2006 Posts: 16 Location: Ireland
|
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:30 pm Post subject:
Still available? Subject description: Still available? |
 |
|
| Are there any of these boards still available? Really interested in taking one or two off you! What's the cost incl. shipping to Ireland? |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
fluxmonkey
Joined: Jun 24, 2005 Posts: 708 Location: cleve
|
Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 8:45 am Post subject:
Re: Still available? Subject description: Still available? |
 |
|
| chutneyfarmer wrote: | | Are there any of these boards still available? Really interested in taking one or two off you! What's the cost incl. shipping to Ireland? |
boards should be in this week. i am updating the documentation and setting up an ordering process... i want to make sure everything goes smoothly from the start. i expect to start taking orders by the first of the year, i will post announcements here. thanks for your interest & patience.
b _________________ www.fluxmonkey.com |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Tim Servo

Joined: Jul 16, 2006 Posts: 924 Location: Silicon Valley
Audio files: 11
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 1:46 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hey BBob,
Looks like a fun circuit. I might offer a few suggestions for the PCB:
1) Try to move the designators (silkscreen legends with things like R10, C4, etc.) so that they are still visible when the component is in place. It takes a little extra room, but it makes assembly and troubleshooting a lot easier.
2) Maybe outline the separate sections of the board with a line on the silkscreen layer. This is just a graphical aid to show people where the separate sections are.
Neither of these is critical, but they might be nice graphical aids for your users. Just a thought.
Tim (has the occasional thought) Servo |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Inventor
Stream Operator

Joined: Oct 13, 2007 Posts: 6221 Location: near Austin, Tx, USA
Audio files: 267
|
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 3:22 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hey bbob, would you like me to feature your board on my radio show "Inventor's Inventions"? The next show is January 5th. I am covering various inventions ie circuit boards that people at electro-music create. Just let me know...
Les _________________ "Let's make noise for peace." - Kijjaz |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|