electro-music.com   Dedicated to experimental electro-acoustic
and electronic music
 
    Front Page  |  Radio
 |  Media  |  Forum  |  Wiki  |  Links
Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
 FAQFAQ   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   LinksLinks
 RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in  Chat RoomChat Room 
 Forum index » DIY Hardware and Software » Lunettas - circuits inspired by Stanley Lunetta
breadboard issues?
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: mosc
Page 1 of 1 [7 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
jptck



Joined: Dec 05, 2015
Posts: 4
Location: philadelphia, pa, usa

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 3:14 pm    Post subject: breadboard issues? Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

hey all, i'm new here! i've really enjoyed lurking thus far. this is an amazing community. y'all are brilliant and kind to each other.

i'm just getting started in the world of lunettas. have self-taught basic concepts in electronics, and improved my soldering skills through circuit bending exploits.

recently, i've been playing around with 4093 / 40106 type oscillators. i'm running off a 9V battery and feeding the oscillators into a simple LM386 based amplifier on the same bus (decoupled with 100uF). all is set up on a cheap breadboard.

frustratingly, i'm having some issues which I'm tempted to chalk up to parasitic effects on the breadboard. i've tried decoupling caps + tying unused inputs to ground. still, the circuit performs unreliably. specifically i'm trying to chain three 4093 gates to achieve a sort of pulsed chirp effect (~1 Hz gating ~5 Hz gating audio rate oscillator). all works fine when the final, audio rate oscillator is at higher frequencies, but things break down when i drop down to lower frequencies. i will diagram the intended vs observed output:

x = tone at, say, 440Hz

intended
x x x x x [silent] x x x x x [silent] ...

observed
x x x x x [sustained tone x] x x x x x [sustained tone x] ...

i'm wondering if any of y'all have ever run into issues when prototyping logic circuits on the breadboard, and how these sorts of issues might be mitigated. is it worth investing in a better breadboard? should i just start building on stripboard?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jptck



Joined: Dec 05, 2015
Posts: 4
Location: philadelphia, pa, usa

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 3:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

i also have questions about which DIY amp designs are best suited to lunettas (smokey? lil gem? coupling capacitors? gain?), but perhaps this should be its own post.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
trav



Joined: Sep 11, 2012
Posts: 108
Location: Auckland
Audio files: 16

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 4:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Looks like your 5 Hz gate is "on" during the [bit between brackets]. Freq could be determining whether that gate halts on a 0 or a 1? Just a guess; posting a schematic would help.

Would it be easier to have the 5 Hz and 1 Hz oscs running separately, use the spare gate on the chip to (N)AND them together, then use this to control the audio rate osc?


4093.png
 Description:
 Filesize:  49.27 KB
 Viewed:  6655 Time(s)

4093.png


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jptck



Joined: Dec 05, 2015
Posts: 4
Location: philadelphia, pa, usa

PostPosted: Sat Dec 12, 2015 12:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

you were absolutely right, trav! thank you.

i knew that tying one of the inputs of a NAND oscillator to ground effectively "shuts off" the oscillation. i forgot that in this deactivated state, the output is held HIGH. this makes it a bit trickier than i was anticipating to chain a few oscillators together - at least, the way i wanted to. contrary to my hopes and expectations, when an oscillator's "gate input" goes LOW, this state doesn't propogate downstream in shutting off all subsequent oscillators.

it is kind of strange that my circuit behaved differently depending on whether the final oscillator was pitched higher or lower...

but enough talk, i'm posting a few diagrams to further clarify things.

EDIT: i didn't see your schematic before posting. that seems like it might work better for me! thank you! look forward to trying it out.


waveform.JPG
 Description:
 Filesize:  1.19 MB
 Viewed:  328 Time(s)
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge.

waveform.JPG



schematic.JPG
 Description:
 Filesize:  1.15 MB
 Viewed:  366 Time(s)
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge.

schematic.JPG


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
synaesthesia



Joined: May 27, 2014
Posts: 291
Location: Germany
Audio files: 85

PostPosted: Sat Dec 12, 2015 3:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Regarding amplifier circuits, if you want a simple circuit and need to drive 1W speakers, there are plenty of integrated power amplifier ICs available like the popular LM386 or the TDA2822. If all you need is to drive a small speaker, the following two circuits are excellent for that task. The left one is really simple and good enough for digital signals like a square wave or PWM output from a micro-controller. The right one is great for analog signals, has a high gain, and is my favorite. You can find it at the Talking Electronics web site as Fig. 27a.


Speaker.PNG
 Description:
 Filesize:  21.73 KB
 Viewed:  378 Time(s)
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge.

Speaker.PNG


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jptck



Joined: Dec 05, 2015
Posts: 4
Location: philadelphia, pa, usa

PostPosted: Sun Dec 13, 2015 12:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

thanks, synaesthesia!

indeed, i am just driving a small speaker. for some reason, i'd been fixating on using the LM386 - i wanted "simple," and this chip is just so ubiquitous in basic audio amp applications. also, it's on the LooneyBoard!

not sure why i didn't think to just use a couple transistors! going to try both of these out (btw: i loooove the Talking Electronics site).

do you happen to know anything about how much power either of these setups would consume? i know the LM386 burns through 9Vs pretty quickly, but i don't know quite enough about electronics yet to take an educated stab at this question.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
umschmitt



Joined: Jun 29, 2011
Posts: 189
Location: brrlin
Audio files: 11

PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2015 8:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Aaaaand i'll take these two amp circuits home too! Thanks a bunch.
_________________
::U::N::S::C::H::N::E::L::L::
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: mosc
Page 1 of 1 [7 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
 Forum index » DIY Hardware and Software » Lunettas - circuits inspired by Stanley Lunetta
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Copyright © 2003 through 2009 by electro-music.com - Conditions Of Use