Author |
Message |
Wayne Higgins

Joined: Aug 16, 2007 Posts: 270 Location: Greenville, FL
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:37 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Alot of good ideas and quotes in this one. It's thread like this that make me question: "Just what are you doin' thayre, Oenyaw?"
I'm glad it was brought up - Switched on Bach. Classical music electronically realized. Music which was generated using a sythesizer and then recorded on magnetic tape. Not electronic music, per se, but definately electronic music.
(Where is Bebe Baron when we need her!) Speaking of... John Cage composses music for prepared piano, not electronic music at all. John Cage, Bebe Baron and one other of whom the name escapes me now perform music for 57 (?) turtables. A work performed in the 1950's using a number of manual turtables with jazz records which were played by the performers. I don't know if I would consider this electronic music, but where else would you put it. I have a difficult time believing music consisting of samples of other recordings to be electronic, but this is a piece using highly technical apparatus of the time to achieve the work. Bebe Baron has been known to slam everyone in the world of electronic, she comes from a time when the electronic musician built there own electronic circuits to produce the sounds. (Soundtrack to Forbidden Planet, among others.
Electronic music can't be restricted to using one instrument and not the other. If one is to say electronic music is only synthesizers, than it sould be considered synthesizer music insted. Then someone like me comes along and does music that every one thinks is a synthesizer, but it's a guitar, effects and computer. I'm still struggling with the term electronic music, is it really what I'm doing? I am using a guitar as a controller, passing it through electronic devices, and realizing it on a computer, to create music. I would hate to admit while under interigation that my music is electronic because it's not something previously composed and performed using tricky gizmos (eg: Switched on Bach), it's merely stuff that I make up as I go along.
Electronic music has been redefined many times over the past 50 years. Electro music and it's differences. Hmmmm. Danceable? Trance inducing? Beat oriented? Trying to explain the difference between Klauss Schulze and Midevel Pundits is not easy. I can hear it, I just can't say it. But there isn't really much of a difference between electronic and electro if you compare it to bluegrass. It's all electronic music if electronics are needed to "pull it off."
But then again... how do we define that middle part of "Whole Lotta Love"?
 |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Tronato
Joined: Sep 21, 2007 Posts: 274 Location: Florida
Audio files: 2
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:46 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hello!
I would define it as "Controlled Electronically Processed Amplified Music"
TRO |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
laura woodswalker

Joined: Oct 06, 2007 Posts: 463 Location: phoenixville pa
Audio files: 18
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 11:05 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Mohoyoho wrote: | It seems to me that any sound (acoustic, digital, electro-analogue, etc.) that is somehow altered (but not merely amplified) or produced via an electronic device, either digital or analogue could be classified as electro-music. This would include Hammond B3s, Mellotrons, electric guitars or vocals going through a simple reverb tank. |
I meant to start a thread asking for the definition of 'electro music'. Because when I make little compositions on cubase and want to share them, I wonder if they are appropriate to this forum.
When recording in cubase I usually use guitars (acoustic & electric), electric bass, a few drums and hand cymbals. Now I just got a synthesizer so I'll be using that too.
Does the addition of a synthesizer make it "electro"? _________________ The most important gear is the brain behind the instrument. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24382 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 296
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:25 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
laura woodswalker wrote: | I wonder if they are appropriate to this forum. |
Please post ! _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Wayne Higgins

Joined: Aug 16, 2007 Posts: 270 Location: Greenville, FL
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:44 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
you know, I read all these opinions the other day during lunch. after babbleing with my painfully long post, I wondered if i missed the point entirely. i was actually responding to the many good points with my own two cents worth then later that day i though (oh, duh, wayneo, the forum is "electro-music"!)
hopefully, y'all are laughing with me.
(somedays, my job blows my mind!) |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
laura woodswalker

Joined: Oct 06, 2007 Posts: 463 Location: phoenixville pa
Audio files: 18
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 5:02 pm Post subject:
The definition of Electro! |
 |
|
laura woodswalker wrote: |
When recording in cubase I usually use guitars (acoustic & electric), electric bass, a few drums and hand cymbals. Now I just got a synthesizer so I'll be using that too.
Does the addition of a synthesizer make it "electro"? |
So the definition of 'electro' might relate to the instruments used, but I'm also wondering if the style of music is included in the definition. If I use a synth to make commercial-sounding elevator music or syrupy wedding music, is it 'electro'? If I make synth recordings that include tunes or sound like 'real' instruments (piano, orchestra) is it 'electro'? Or is the style an important element of the definition? Is 'electro' considered trancey, experimental, weird, underground, something for audiophiles who like weird noises? _________________ The most important gear is the brain behind the instrument. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Antimon
Joined: Jan 18, 2005 Posts: 4145 Location: Sweden
Audio files: 371
G2 patch files: 100
|
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 4:44 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
My take on this is that the emphasis here is on the word "music", and if you're not scared off by the "electro" in front, you can probably find a home or at least some casual enjoyment here somewhere, whatever actual kind of music you're into.
/Stefan _________________ Antimon's Window
@soundcloud @Flattr home - you can't explain music |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Kassen
Janitor


Joined: Jul 06, 2004 Posts: 7678 Location: The Hague, NL
G2 patch files: 3
|
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 10:23 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I don't think it's that important or that interesting, any formal definition we might come up with is bound to be so broad it's useless or so narrow half the people will object.
What I believe we are seeing is something that has bothered me since I started recording to computers; when you record to MD or tape or whatever all is fine but when you record to a computer you will *have* to name the file when you may not be ready yet to give your (partial)composition a name. Websites have the same issue, you can't have a website without naming it (well, you could name pieces after the date and time or a site after it's IP# but that gets unpractical very quickly).
As long as we remember the map is not the territory all should be fine. _________________ Kassen |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
laura woodswalker

Joined: Oct 06, 2007 Posts: 463 Location: phoenixville pa
Audio files: 18
|
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 12:53 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Kassen wrote: | when you record to MD or tape or whatever all is fine but when you record to a computer you will *have* to name the file when you may not be ready yet to give your (partial)composition a name. |
Hey, I was just thinking about that today! I was recording a few little riffs in Cubase and I had to name the file. So I named it "nov 17". How else to differentiate all my little cubase scratch tracks? But if it ever becomes a real song, cubase will be all confused because it won't know how to locate all the .wav tracks in it.
Wow, computers can be dumb sometimes  _________________ The most important gear is the brain behind the instrument. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Wayne Higgins

Joined: Aug 16, 2007 Posts: 270 Location: Greenville, FL
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:39 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I always lable my files with the date recorded, or begun, and I know I'm not alone in doing this. An internet myspace friend form Colorado said it's easier to keep track of them that way. I agree. I don't name things until they are complete, and sometimes not even then. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
kkissinger
Stream Operator

Joined: Mar 28, 2006 Posts: 1425 Location: Kansas City, Mo USA
Audio files: 45
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 1:51 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I do all of my composition work in Cubase these days. My filenames are just filenames that have little to do with the name of the composition and usually include the date and something to jog my memory. A typical filename would be something like:
LoopExperimentNov2007 -- or something like that.
As far as naming works, I usually develop a working title that usually isn't the final title. The working title helps to keep me focused on the theme of the music. Often the final title is a concise statement of the "working title".
An exception was "The Sad Little Ghost" http://kevinkissinger.com/sadlittleghost.shtml... the working title and the final title are the same. My other Halloween work "Mummies and Unholy Ghosts" http://kevinkissinger.com/mummies.shtml had a working title of "Mummies in Search of Caffeine".
I find that to come up with a working title is a great help to me to keep focused. And it is more fun for me to work on a tune about pulsars, space trips, secret or imaginary thoughts, ghosts, or whatever than to work on an "etude" or "sonata". _________________ -- Kevin
http://kevinkissinger.com |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Wayne Higgins

Joined: Aug 16, 2007 Posts: 270 Location: Greenville, FL
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 3:51 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
There are times when a "Theme idea" hits me and I can't stop until it's finished. "The Chrystallized Delusion is from definition out a book of clinical schizophrenia. "Strength Through Joy" is about Nazi propoganda, read about that in a footnote in the book "In Hitler's Germany". so on and so on
Lately, I have been doing "demos" and live rehersal experiments. That's the dating game.
http://www.myspace.com/oenyaw000
111007a |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:09 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Oenyaw wrote: | "Strength Through Joy" is about Nazi propoganda, read about that in a footnote in the book "In Hitler's Germany". so on and so on
|
Kraft durch Freude _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:13 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
The Wilhelm Gustloff was a KdF ship _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Kassen
Janitor


Joined: Jul 06, 2004 Posts: 7678 Location: The Hague, NL
G2 patch files: 3
|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:54 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
kkissinger wrote: | "Mummies in Search of Caffeine".
|
Utterly brilliant! Why change that? That's such a great title. _________________ Kassen |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
renevanderwouden

Joined: Feb 25, 2006 Posts: 186 Location: Gouda (NL)
Audio files: 8
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|