Author |
Message |
renevanderwouden

Joined: Feb 25, 2006 Posts: 186 Location: Gouda (NL)
Audio files: 8
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:45 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Basically I first figure out why I want to write a piece, then spend some time to solve the many issues. Then I start writing the whole thing more or less vertically. I never actually do plain arranging. later I try to make a fair interpretation of the piece and hopefully record it. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
phrozenlight

Joined: Jul 24, 2006 Posts: 19 Location: Haren The Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 1:03 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
01 - I choose some VSTi's and effects
02 - create some presets for the VSTi's & effects
03 - play some "live" pieces
04 - change the presets etc
05 - repeating 3 & 4 .
06 - play & record some patterns
07 - timeshifting and arranging the patterns
08 - render the "song" to a wav file.
09 - add a fade in and out.
10 - forget the track for some days
11 - final listening
12 - share it with my fans
(13 - sometimes it will be deleted) _________________ Phrozenlight
www.phrozenlight.nl |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
renevanderwouden

Joined: Feb 25, 2006 Posts: 186 Location: Gouda (NL)
Audio files: 8
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 1:14 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Matrix screen?
 _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
renevanderwouden

Joined: Feb 25, 2006 Posts: 186 Location: Gouda (NL)
Audio files: 8
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 1:27 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
renevanderwouden wrote: | In Logic window #6. With the blocks. This is easy editing notes. |
I cannot answer for phrozenlight of course.
Anyways, yes I see what you mean, but I rarely use a recording device for actually writing a piece of music. I keep the writing and the recording apart. These are two different concepts. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
phrozenlight

Joined: Jul 24, 2006 Posts: 19 Location: Haren The Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 1:38 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
lol I think rene can better use quote
so we can see to which message he replies,
rene you are not a noob on forums are you  _________________ Phrozenlight
www.phrozenlight.nl |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
renevanderwouden

Joined: Feb 25, 2006 Posts: 186 Location: Gouda (NL)
Audio files: 8
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Afro88

Joined: Jun 20, 2004 Posts: 701 Location: Brisbane, Australia
Audio files: 12
G2 patch files: 79
|
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 4:30 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Start with more to get less. Put down as many ideas as you possibly can that somehow relate to the same track. Don't arrange them into a song yet, just put down as much material as you possibly can. Leave it for a day, then grab the bits that work the best together and arrange your track. Arranging is a different process than composing, and it's much easier if you separate the two. You don't get stuck when you need a certain riff or chord but don't know what this certain element should be, cause you've always got something that you can try out at the click of a button.
This is the best arranging advice I have ever been given. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 4:43 pm Post subject:
Re: Arranging techniques Subject description: How do you work? |
 |
|
renevanderwouden wrote: | About arranging techniques.
1. Do you just start to play and press record like instant composing.
2. Or do you already have a melody composed and start straight away at the beginning?
3. Or do you have a melody and start arranging in the middle of the piece? |
Are you asking about which methods we are using when we write a piece of music? You aren´t really talking "arranging" here? Are you thinking a particular style here or what?  _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr Last edited by elektro80 on Mon Jul 31, 2006 3:02 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Kassen
Janitor


Joined: Jul 06, 2004 Posts: 7678 Location: The Hague, NL
G2 patch files: 3
|
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 3:01 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I don't realy understand it either. Sounds more like "ways to use a DAW to write music" then like "aranging" to me.
Personally I think DAW's aren't all that suitable for electronic music at all. _________________ Kassen |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 3:14 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I always felt the concept of "arranging" is best applied to a situation when you actually already have a piece of music and you want to:
Quote: | rewrite a piece of pre-existing music for a specific set of instruments or voices, often in harmony or with additional original material. |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arranging
Quote: | An arrangement is often an adaptation of a previously arranged piece of music for a musical application other than that for which it was originally intended. This includes arrangements for different instruments, for example an arrangement for piano or flute, or a duet, based on a symphonic piece, or an arrangement of instrumental accompaniment for vocal music). Or, it may be an adaptation for another musical style, for example adaptation of a classical piece for a jazz or rock ensemble, orchestration of a song written by a popular band, or an a cappella setting of a song from a stage musical or an opera.
In jazz or studio settings, "arranging" is most commonly used to describe the process that is also called orchestration, adaptation, setting, instrumentation, or a variety of other terms. Orchestration differs in that it is only adapting music for an orchestra or musical ensemble while arranging "involves adding compositional techniques, such as new thematic material for introductions, transitions, or modulations, and endings |
Personally I tend to not write music that is suitable for adaption for an ensemble of pan flutes or steel drums or whatever. I might rewrite the piece but that is still not arranging.
I wonder of the initial question should have been something like: "how do you write your music". Kassen has a point re the DAW issue here. Hopefully a piece of music will transcend the tools used. Last edited by elektro80 on Mon Jul 31, 2006 3:21 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Kassen
Janitor


Joined: Jul 06, 2004 Posts: 7678 Location: The Hague, NL
G2 patch files: 3
|
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 3:20 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
elektro80 wrote: | Matrix screen?
 |
I googled. Supposedly the "matrix schreen" is Apple's name for a piano roll. How this would help one "To reset (a composition) for other instruments or voices or as another style of performance." (dictionary.com) is utterly beyond me but perhaps it supports MIDI messages for instrument changes or something?
[edit; crossing posts....] _________________ Kassen |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 3:23 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Yeah, the piano roll.. and yes.. I am not seeing the arranging side of this either. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 3:32 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
renevanderwouden wrote: | About arranging techniques.
1. Do you just start to play and press record like instant composing.
2. Or do you already have a melody composed and start straight away at the beginning?
3. Or do you have a melody and start arranging in the middle of the piece? |
Hmm..
I guess Rene will fill us in.  _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Kassen
Janitor


Joined: Jul 06, 2004 Posts: 7678 Location: The Hague, NL
G2 patch files: 3
|
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 6:06 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
elektro80 wrote: | Hopefully a piece of music will transcend the tools used. |
That's what I meant. I think that increasingly off the shelf products are superimposing "features" for "musical gestures". I'm not nesicarily opposed to that but it does lead to the question who's gestures are in the music.
"arranging" then becomes a rather muddy affair. If it's not clear what's a melody, a note or a gesture (never mind a instrument!) then how does one arrange? Is arranging in that sense identical to remixing?
If so, I did arange a few pieces, mostly because the originalversions had sold wellbut sometimes for live performance where recreations of studio performances were impossible or undesirered (read; people has heard it too damned often). Generally I start b listening very well to the core melodic phrases, to how I preceive where the piece's mood "wants to go", then develop new instruments to try and take it there.
Very rarely do I touch aactual piano roll in that process, more often I add extra controll channels to put further emphasis on expression. _________________ Kassen |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
kkissinger
Stream Operator

Joined: Mar 28, 2006 Posts: 1425 Location: Kansas City, Mo USA
Audio files: 45
|
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 9:15 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Interesting question.
One of the issues I encounter when working in the studio is "option shock" due to the almost unlimited possibilities. When I am ready to compose my own music or arrange something already composed, I choose the pallette of sounds that I want to utilize.
I remind myself not to fret too much over the selected pallette because I can modify and/or add to it later if need be. If I am writing for an ensemble of "real" instruments, then I have to consider the range and other limitations of the ensemble, of course.
Often the stereo effects are important to me and I usually decide in advance where certain sounds will be in the mix so that I can more easily arrange interplay between the left and right sides.
Usually my pallette will include sections of related sounds... similar to the sections of an orchestra (i.e., percussion, brass, etc). In general, I group electronic sounds according to their suitability for rapid passages or slow ones. In general sounds that share the same initial attack can be swapped more easily than sounds with vastly different attacks. (a patch that is great for rapid 32nd notes may not swap with a pad that fades in slowly).
Back in the analog / tape recorder days, the task of patching, arranging, and performing happened concurrently. Today it is possible to separate these tasks in time and it is MUCH easier to go back and change things later. (Ah, how many of us remember how a part that sounded balanced in the submix would sound buried after all the other tracks were added! Those were the days
I fret more about the voice-leadings, harmony, and basic structure of the music than the actual choice of sounds. Even in an improvised work, I want to have some kind of overall structure in mind. With a piece of music that is basically well-crafted, many orchestrations are possible and most will sound great.
Often times, I will hear a certain melody on a certain part at a certain place. I go ahead and put that in and move ahead. I'll come back later to add the other parts.
I like to use Cubase's "piano roll" style editor -- even for traditional music. I like an environment where it is equally easy to read and write music in any key. To compose in the key of a# minor is just as easy as C major with a "piano roll" whereas to read a score with seven sharps in the key signature is not my idea of a fun time
Arranging and composing are so entertwined for me that I find it hard to talk one of the topics without delving into the other. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Kassen
Janitor


Joined: Jul 06, 2004 Posts: 7678 Location: The Hague, NL
G2 patch files: 3
|
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 7:39 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
kkissinger wrote: |
Back in the analog / tape recorder days, the task of patching, arranging, and performing happened concurrently. Today it is possible to separate these tasks in time and it is MUCH easier to go back and change things later. (Ah, how many of us remember how a part that sounded balanced in the submix would sound buried after all the other tracks were added! Those were the days
|
I did. I forced myself to to see what would happen.
It's hard and fatuiging but I actually think there are advantages. It forces you to start out with a fairly strong visison of what you want. I found that because it's harder to go back you focus more on what you are doing and often it can actually make you work more efficient. I also think that making punch in/out harder results in stronger, more focused takes.
I'd never do it that way permanently but taking some of that perspective with you to a modern setup can bring a lot of benefits. Trying things is good but regarding everything as non-permenent all the time can eat time in theend and make you shy away from making strong choices about where you want to go. _________________ Kassen |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
kkissinger
Stream Operator

Joined: Mar 28, 2006 Posts: 1425 Location: Kansas City, Mo USA
Audio files: 45
|
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 8:14 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Kassen wrote:
Quote: | I also think that making punch in/out harder results in stronger, more focused takes. |
Oh, isn't that the truth! Since punching in on tape is a destructive edit one is forced to make a decision to attempt a better take than the take that is about to be discarded.
In that sense, the musician is competing with his/her self. When everything clicks, the tape will capture the excitement and adventure of the performance as well as the sound.
Having said that, I wouldn't want to give up my modern Cubase environment. However, as you said, to carry that same sense of "getting it right" keeps the excitement and focus in the work. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
renevanderwouden

Joined: Feb 25, 2006 Posts: 186 Location: Gouda (NL)
Audio files: 8
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Kassen
Janitor


Joined: Jul 06, 2004 Posts: 7678 Location: The Hague, NL
G2 patch files: 3
|
Posted: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:30 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Ok. So the real question is "how do you find a harmony (or hamonies) that fit a melody and wether or not you use a 999bucks piano roll with that?
Well, in that case; I mostly don't (unless aranging (in the canonical sense) a piece writen by somebody else). Most of the time I prefer to imply chords inside of the timbre of a single note, _________________ Kassen |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
renevanderwouden

Joined: Feb 25, 2006 Posts: 186 Location: Gouda (NL)
Audio files: 8
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
opg

Joined: Mar 29, 2004 Posts: 954 Location: Berkeley, CA, US
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 6:34 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Kassen wrote: | Personally I think DAW's aren't all that suitable for electronic music at all. |
I am slowly starting to realize this. It is much easier for me to get into ruts when all I work with is Fruity Loops/Cubase and a whole mess of VSTis and FX plug-ins. It's really easy to just fiddle around with an old synth or the SoundLab all day and start thinking of good ideas. I just need to slowly change my processes so I can do this and record, then arrange. Well, this is at least how I am thinking about it now.
For example, it was not until just yesterday that I used a SYSEX editor to quickly edit and send patches to a Casio CZ-1000. What a huge difference. After that, I started thinking about sequencers (not that a CZ-1000 maybe be best at utilizing one) - and not softsequencers - the real deal. I haven't actually built the SoundLab yet (hopefully near the end of next month I'll start), but I'm going to need to build a keyboard or foot pedal for it. I also have a trigger-to-MIDI-converter for a DIY electronic drumset. I actually like the idea of still using a DAW for tweaking things after I'm done, though.
I guess you could say I'm having trouble balancing what is recorded real-time (drums and SoundLab) and what is setup in a piano roll and then sent to the CZ-1000 (any any other MIDI-capable analog or "phase distortion" synth).
The next task is how to incorporate the overwhelming amount of vintage computers into this mess. Sure, I could use or design programs that store patterns, but how would I trigger them if I was doing live recording? I've got the trigger-to-MIDI controller with a good 16 inputs, but how do you go MIDI to trigger? Can I hit a drumpad and play a pattern from an Apple II or C64, and then hit a 2nd pad to play a second pattern? Perhaps I'll need some old computer accessories (Mockingboard, etc).
No wonder I have a fire extinguisher attatched to my head.  _________________ One Player Game | OPG on SoundCloud |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
aquanaut

Joined: Apr 25, 2004 Posts: 313 Location: Montreal
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:05 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
i write a lead sheet with my guitar first. After that its only a matter of what note each instrument will play and how. But the basic structures is done before i start the computer. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|