electro-music.com   Dedicated to experimental electro-acoustic
and electronic music
 
    Front Page  |  Radio
 |  Media  |  Forum  |  Wiki  |  Links
Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
 FAQFAQ   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   LinksLinks
 RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in  Chat RoomChat Room 
go to the radio page Live at electro-music.com radio 1 Please visit the chat
  host / artist show at your time
today> Sorry, no program tonight. Chez Mosc
 Forum index » DIY Hardware and Software » Lunettas - circuits inspired by Stanley Lunetta
Overvoltage protection on CMOS inputs
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: mosc
Page 1 of 1 [4 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Adam-V



Joined: Jan 29, 2007
Posts: 300
Location: Australia
Audio files: 1

PostPosted: Tue Apr 01, 2008 8:42 pm    Post subject: Overvoltage protection on CMOS inputs
Subject description: For those of us wishing to process external signals
Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

I have a mixture of Doepfer and Roland 100m which can supply gate and trigger levels ranging from 8-12V on the Doepfer (despite their specs saying 5V!) and 15V on the Roland and was thinking that it would be mightily handy to be able to just plug modular synth signals straight in to the Lunetta blocks without having to run them through a level converter block.

My initial thoughts were to use a 9V supply so that the outputs from the Lunetta blocks could be plugged directly into both modular systems (except for any of the audio inputs obviously) but then the Lunetta block inputs will be damaged by the signals coming from the modular so I was wondering if there is a relatively simple way to protect the inputs of CMOS devices from overvoltage?

Any ideas or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Cheers,
Adam-V

_________________
Digitalis Effect | Fractured Symmetry (www.spiralsect.com)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bugbrand



Joined: Nov 27, 2005
Posts: 846
Location: Bristol, UK
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 1

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 12:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Well, actually, many CMOS chips have input protection diodes already on them (I was looking at the 4069 and 40106 datasheets last night).

Otherwise, I'd have thought a suitable zener (9v?) on the input? - could actually be a bit lower as triggering would usually be 1/2 of the voltage supply..

May be babbling!

_________________
http://www.bugbrand.co.uk
http://www.bugbrand.blogspot.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
blue hell
Site Admin


Joined: Apr 03, 2004
Posts: 24422
Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 297
G2 patch files: 320

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 5:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Do not use CMOS internal protection diodes for over voltage protection, unless you did the calculations to make sure that no more than around 0.3 uA will run through those diodes.

These diodes are not designed for over voltage protection and if you carelessly rely on them you will blow them. The device will still seem to work with blown protection diodes usually but the input impedance of the pin will be reduced to a few kOhm, they are not up to speed specs anymore and will draw much more current from the power supply.

_________________
Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
Posted Image, might have been reduced in size. Click Image to view fullscreen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Adam-V



Joined: Jan 29, 2007
Posts: 300
Location: Australia
Audio files: 1

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 11:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

OK, I've had a bit of a dig around the interweb and although most of my searching resulted in pages about the internal protection diodes I did find some useful information.

I was thinking that (as suggested by Tom) just sticking a zener diode on each input as shown in diagram 2 below might be OK but it would appear that a circuit mimicking the internal protection circuit using schottky diodes is the safest way to go especially when coupled with a zener diode to keep the supply rails at a reasonable level. Something like the one in diagram 1 below.

Cheers,
Adam-V


InputProtection2.JPG
 Description:
Diagram 1
 Filesize:  12.74 KB
 Viewed:  8792 Time(s)

InputProtection2.JPG



InputProtection1.JPG
 Description:
Diagram 2
 Filesize:  7.57 KB
 Viewed:  8792 Time(s)

InputProtection1.JPG



_________________
Digitalis Effect | Fractured Symmetry (www.spiralsect.com)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: mosc
Page 1 of 1 [4 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
 Forum index » DIY Hardware and Software » Lunettas - circuits inspired by Stanley Lunetta
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Copyright © 2003 through 2009 by electro-music.com - Conditions Of Use