Author |
Message |
younger
Joined: Jul 26, 2008 Posts: 2 Location: Moscow
|
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 3:38 am Post subject:
how do you analyse tracks except for spectrum analysis? |
 |
|
Hello, I wonder are there anything how you usually analyse your tracks as well as others?
I mean not just looking at spectrum and RMS, but maybe anything else concerning sound ?
Regards |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24423 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 297
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Sun Aug 24, 2008 9:35 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I do look at the spectrum at times when I made something abstract in the wave editor to see if I can find why things are hurting my ears or why it's sounding muddy ... but it doesn't show too much to me ... actually I find it best to just try some filters and listen what happens.
What would you use RMS values for? _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Uncle Krunkus
Moderator

Joined: Jul 11, 2005 Posts: 4761 Location: Sydney, Australia
Audio files: 52
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 2:08 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I use the Soundforge spectrum analysis sometimes, but mainly to find the valleys and troughs in a partial mix. Usually because I'm trying to make something else fit in. This is usually because I've overworked the track and actually need to take some stuff out!
Sometimes I want to find the "dominant frequency" of a noisy part that might need re-tuning.
I also use the "find" function to make sure the mix hasn't topped out. ie; find -> largest peak. Then if the largest peak has the top taken off, I've mixed it too hot, and I go back and do it again. _________________ What makes a space ours, is what we put there, and what we do there. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
younger
Joined: Jul 26, 2008 Posts: 2 Location: Moscow
|
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:21 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
thanks for your answers !
Blue Hell, I analyse RMS because its amplitude reflects perceived loudness better than peak amplitude. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
EdisonRex
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 07, 2007 Posts: 4579 Location: London, UK
Audio files: 172
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:56 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
RMS with peak metering is pretty common but I don't find it useful for much more than track mixing. I've never really found RMS to be reliable because perceived loudness is biased; energy across the spectrum is perceived as much louder at low frequencies than high, and it is so with the physical output.
I use my ears a lot, to analyse a mix. It's a bit old fashioned but it seems to work for me.
And other than that, I will rarely use spectrum displays (pretty easy to whip up in Max/MSP, I have a patch I keep handy) to view particular phenomena.
Welcome, by the way. _________________ Garret: It's so retro.
EGM: What does retro mean to you?
Parker: Like, old and outdated.
Home,My Studio,and another view |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|