Author |
Message |
vcfool

Joined: Jun 19, 2008 Posts: 23 Location: Barcelona
|
Posted: Mon Oct 27, 2008 7:56 am Post subject:
ADSR schematics do not match the PCB ?? |
 |
|
Hi,
I've been protoboarding the YuSynth ADSR this morning, following the schematics. When finished, I found it was not working: it didn't got any respone when gate in was applied. After checking all the connections twice and making sure it was all ok, I began checking the 3 transitor connections on the PCB tracks and I noticed it is different from the schematics:
On the schematics the Base of Q3 is connected to the Collector of Q1 through a 10N cap.
On the PCB the Base of Q3 is connected to the Collector of Q2 through a 15N cap.
So I changed that connection following the PCB and everything seems to work as expected now...
This is confusing me. Has anyone experienced this?
Am I doing something wrong? Maybe I am just misreading something...
By the way, I am using a normal NE555, by looking at the Datasheets I guess it will work the same as a CMOS 7555. Or shall I better look for a 7555?
Thanks everyone in advance! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
yusynth

Joined: Nov 24, 2005 Posts: 1314 Location: France
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 12:36 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hi
Yes you're right I made a mistake when I redrew the new version of the schematic. I am fixing this ASAP. The old version of the schematics was correct and I introduced the mistake when I wanted to improve the drawing... In French we have a saying : "betterness is the foe of rightness" ...
By the way you'd better use the CMOS version. The NE555 is known to have dramatic issues concerning the current it draws from the power line during the astable switching stage. The power draw goes up to 100mA during this transient. The CMOS version does not exhibit such issues. _________________ Yves Last edited by yusynth on Tue Oct 28, 2008 5:00 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
vcfool

Joined: Jun 19, 2008 Posts: 23 Location: Barcelona
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 4:46 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hi,
Thanks for your answer.
After spending some time playing with the ADSR, I have another question reganding the way it acts:
Let's say you trigger the ADSR, let it reach the Sustain state and hold it there. Now the Sustain will work as a kind if Manual CV in all the envelopes I have tried so far. But in this one, you can only lower it, and it follows correctly, but it won't go up again.
So when in the Sustain state, (while holding the key and sound is on) you can only change the Sustain to lower voltages, not to higher ones. Once it reaches a Min. V it will not raise above this level again without re-triggering the ADSR again.
Is this normal operation on this design or shall I check connections again?
Not being native english speaking, I don't know if I am making myself clear.
BTW, I'll look for a CMOS 7555.
Thanks again. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
yusynth

Joined: Nov 24, 2005 Posts: 1314 Location: France
|
Posted: Tue Oct 28, 2008 4:58 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
vcfool wrote: |
So when in the Sustain state, (while holding the key and sound is on) you can only change the Sustain to lower voltages, not to higher ones. Once it reaches a Min. V it will not raise above this level again without re-triggering the ADSR again.
Is this normal operation on this design or shall I check connections again?
Not being native english speaking, I don't know if I am making myself clear.
BTW, I'll look for a CMOS 7555.
Thanks again. |
Yes this is the normal operating mode for this circuit because of the diode D4 which only allows discharging. To obtain the kind of behaviour you mention it would require a different circuit architecture based on analogue switches.
Don't worry, I am no native english speaker either, and you made yourself clear. _________________ Yves |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
vcfool

Joined: Jun 19, 2008 Posts: 23 Location: Barcelona
|
Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:33 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hi,
So I found a Motorola MC1455. By looking at the datasheet I can't make clear if this is a good replacement for the 7555...
Can somebody tell if it is a CMOS version or a normal 555?
Thanks! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
EdisonRex
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 07, 2007 Posts: 4579 Location: London, UK
Audio files: 172
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 1:33 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
vcfool wrote: | Hi,
So I found a Motorola MC1455. By looking at the datasheet I can't make clear if this is a good replacement for the 7555...
Can somebody tell if it is a CMOS version or a normal 555?
Thanks! |
It is a CMOS version. _________________ Garret: It's so retro.
EGM: What does retro mean to you?
Parker: Like, old and outdated.
Home,My Studio,and another view |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
vcfool

Joined: Jun 19, 2008 Posts: 23 Location: Barcelona
|
Posted: Tue Nov 04, 2008 9:15 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Thanks! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
LetterBeacon
Joined: Mar 18, 2008 Posts: 454 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:45 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Should I use a 10n or 15n polyester cap between Q3 and Q2?
The schematic and the BOM say 10n, but the PCB layout says 15n...
Thanks! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
yusynth

Joined: Nov 24, 2005 Posts: 1314 Location: France
|
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 2:34 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
10n or 15n doesn't make a significant difference in this case, use the value you have at hand.  _________________ Yves |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
LetterBeacon
Joined: Mar 18, 2008 Posts: 454 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:46 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Thanks for that.
Also, the schematic says C6 is 10nf but the BOM and PCB say it's 100nf. I've assumed it's supposed to be 100nf. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
yusynth

Joined: Nov 24, 2005 Posts: 1314 Location: France
|
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 10:40 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
correct I'll fix that _________________ Yves |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
yusynth

Joined: Nov 24, 2005 Posts: 1314 Location: France
|
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 10:57 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Page fixed _________________ Yves |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
softfin

Joined: Oct 11, 2006 Posts: 271 Location: Far in the north
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Sat Jan 31, 2009 12:50 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I stripboarded one of these ADSRs from the schematic more than a year ago and couldn't get it to work.
After spotting this topic, I repaired it and managed to get it working straight away.Thanks for the correction ! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
scriptstyle

Joined: Jan 22, 2008 Posts: 250 Location: nj
|
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:28 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
just noticed r18 on the schematic is listed as r10 on the bom. not sure if its already been mentioned? |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
yusynth

Joined: Nov 24, 2005 Posts: 1314 Location: France
|
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 12:38 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I'll check that and fix it, thanks for mentionning. _________________ Yves |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|