electro-music.com   Dedicated to experimental electro-acoustic
and electronic music
 
    Front Page  |  Radio
 |  Media  |  Forum  |  Wiki  |  Links
Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
 FAQFAQ   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   LinksLinks
 RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in  Chat RoomChat Room 
go to the radio page Live at electro-music.com radio 1 Please visit the chat
  host / artist show at your time
today> Modulator ESP Adventures In Sound
 Forum index » DIY Hardware and Software » Developers' Corner
LM13700 OTA with Opamps instead of on-chip darlingtons
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: DrJustice
Page 1 of 1 [4 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
KammutierSpule



Joined: Feb 07, 2008
Posts: 40
Location: Aveiro - Portugal

PostPosted: Sat Feb 01, 2020 3:46 pm    Post subject: LM13700 OTA with Opamps instead of on-chip darlingtons
Subject description: why?
Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

I have seen some designed using the LM13700 OTA that instead of using their on-chip darlington, they use an external Opamp to the effect.

What they are trying to solve by using Opamps?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ixtern



Joined: Jun 25, 2018
Posts: 145
Location: Poland

PostPosted: Sat Feb 01, 2020 4:32 pm    Post subject: Re: LM13700 OTA with Opamps instead of on-chip darlingtons
Subject description: why?
Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

KammutierSpule wrote:
I have seen some designed using the LM13700 OTA that instead of using their on-chip darlington, they use an external Opamp to the effect.

What they are trying to solve by using Opamps?

There may be some answers:
- universal design: as LM13600 and LM13700 buffers are differs slightly, not using buffers allows to use either of them;
- tighter control of circuit parameters: op amps are more predictable then transistors and usually have better parameters;
- a habit: some designers feel better with op amps than transistors.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
PHOBoS



Joined: Jan 14, 2010
Posts: 5603
Location: Moon Base
Audio files: 705

PostPosted: Sun Feb 02, 2020 8:08 am    Post subject: Re: LM13700 OTA with Opamps instead of on-chip darlingtons
Subject description: why?
Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

ixtern wrote:
a habit: some designers feel better with op amps than transistors.

Although I don't really design circuits with OTAs I do generally prefer opamps over transistors. Main reason being that opamps can sink AND source
while a transistor can only do one of those things. Also I seem to recall that using the internal darlington transistor of the OTA adds a DC offset which
you will have to compensate.

_________________
"My perf, it's full of holes!"
http://phobos.000space.com/
SoundCloud BandCamp MixCloud Stickney Synthyards Captain Collider Twitch YouTube
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
dslamnig



Joined: Dec 18, 2020
Posts: 28
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Audio files: 6

PostPosted: Sun Feb 07, 2021 10:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

From my hands-on experience:

It's the classic observer/observed problem. There's no observation without interaction. In quantum physics (at least the Copenhagen interpretation Wink observation causes the collapse of the wave function.

But back to macroscopic, it's the triangle or saw waveform that will be affected. In the usual VCO core setup a cap is fed a constant current from the OTA, so the voltage rises or decreases linearly - that's the waveform. As long as you don't touch it it's perfect (if we disregard OTA and cap non-linearities). But when you connect a resistor to the ground and the gate of the input transistor of the buffer, the current leaks in a non-linear way and the waveform is compromised.

I found, as a lot of other people before me, that the least invasive way to observe the cap voltage is to connect it (only) to the positive input of an opamp, and wire the opamp as a voltage follower. TL07x has JFET inputs, so the current will only leak to charge the JFET gate cap, and this is much less then when using a buffer.

And yes, there's the buffer output offset problem, too.

I learned all this the hard way when building my dual-core VCO:
https://electro-music.com/forum/topic-72488.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: DrJustice
Page 1 of 1 [4 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
 Forum index » DIY Hardware and Software » Developers' Corner
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Copyright © 2003 through 2009 by electro-music.com - Conditions Of Use