Author |
Message |
funkyfarm

Joined: Jan 21, 2007 Posts: 583 Location: France
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 12:54 pm Post subject:
(TAU PIPE) Stereo outputs from mono delay-based fx |
 |
|
With chorus and flanger, I know two methods to output stereo from a monophonic process :
- panning DRY signal full Left and WET signal full Right (btw it doesn’t have to be always full…)
BOSS CE-3 uses this method.
- mixing these two sounds with three desk tracks : DRY set to Centre, WET panned to the left and –WET (phase opposition) panned to the right.
I dare some formula like :
Left = WET+DRY/2 and Right = DRY/2-WET
I guess BOSS CE-5 uses this method, and leads to a rather different effect (with no mono compatibility at all… notice Left + Right = DRY)
I’m quite lost concerning the JH-20 Phaser output configuration, in phasing mode. (which can be seen as delay based fx)
MAIN OUT mixes what I would call –DRY (Input signal inversed by input stage U1A) and the processed sound from U3A (WET) ; this output also feeds the audio feedback circuit (via RESO pot)
Setting the IC into a inverting mixer (+in to ground, etc), we can imagine output formula to be : MAIN OUT = -(-DRY+WET) = DRY - WET
AUX OUT
The same as above “–DRY signal” goes to –in of U4B, mixed with RESO signal.
WET sound goes to +in of U4B, via a set of 10k/56k resistors.
Does it mean lower the amplitude of WET signal by two ? then adding it to the two others ?
AUX OUT = -(-DRY+RESO) + WET
AUX OUT = DRY + WET – RESO ?
Can it just be seen from this point of view ?
Am I just real ridiculous with this kind of formulas ?
i've just noticed fx cancelation when those outputs are simultaneously set to centre. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jhaible

Joined: May 25, 2007 Posts: 2014 Location: Germany
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 11:28 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Most of these pseudo stereo FX devices start with something like positive mix on one side and negative mix on the other side. And then some of them (like the Tau) change that scheme slightly, to avoid loosing the stereo balance for extreme resonance settings; that's why with resonance turned up, the mix is different.
Doesn't avoid cancellation when mixed to mono, though.
JH. _________________ "I tell you the truth, if anyone says to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it will be done for him. Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours." (Mk 11,23f) |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
funkyfarm

Joined: Jan 21, 2007 Posts: 583 Location: France
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 5:04 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
jhaible wrote: | Most of these pseudo stereo FX devices start with something like positive mix on one side and negative mix on the other side. |
i see...
And as there's no dry/wet pot. (because it's a phaser, always mixing dry and wet signals ?), what's the way to get the most subtle fx from this phaser (stereo and sonic-wise) ?
all depends on the panel control setting ? |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jhaible

Joined: May 25, 2007 Posts: 2014 Location: Germany
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 1:43 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
funkyfarm wrote: | jhaible wrote: | Most of these pseudo stereo FX devices start with something like positive mix on one side and negative mix on the other side. |
i see...
And as there's no dry/wet pot. (because it's a phaser, always mixing dry and wet signals ?), what's the way to get the most subtle fx from this phaser (stereo and sonic-wise) ?
all depends on the panel control setting ? |
If you switch it to "Vibrato" and set Resonance to Minimum, the main output is just the all pass filtered signal, and the Aux input is just the dry signal. So you can create a Mix that's different from 50% externally, or by just connecting a pot between the two outputs. (10k lin pot, ccw end to Aux Output, cw end to Main Output, wiper is variable wet/dry mix output. Untested, but should work.)
JH. _________________ "I tell you the truth, if anyone says to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it will be done for him. Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours." (Mk 11,23f) |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
funkyfarm

Joined: Jan 21, 2007 Posts: 583 Location: France
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 11:29 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Thank you very much.
for all. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
funkyfarm

Joined: Jan 21, 2007 Posts: 583 Location: France
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 5:43 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
The vibrato mode provides a really great effect.
I will use it further more.
But now i need to put back the potentiometers on the panel to compensate the level loss
("the loop is looped", i promised no more question)
PS : I also like to have a switch to slow down lfo rate ; will throw a sample of a slowly evolving sequence... |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jhaible

Joined: May 25, 2007 Posts: 2014 Location: Germany
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 3:04 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Quote: | PS : I also like to have a switch to slow down lfo rate ; will throw a sample of a slowly evolving sequence... |
Just connect a bigger cap in parallel with the integration cap in the LFO, via a switch.
JH.
Now playing: Klaus Schulze, Timewind _________________ "I tell you the truth, if anyone says to this mountain, 'Go, throw yourself into the sea,' and does not doubt in his heart but believes that what he says will happen, it will be done for him. Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours." (Mk 11,23f) |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
funkyfarm

Joined: Jan 21, 2007 Posts: 583 Location: France
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 10:20 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
yes, i put another 470nF cap, via a switch, and it's slow cool ! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbertalk

Joined: May 05, 2008 Posts: 992 Location: Austin, TX
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:51 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
jhaible wrote: | Just connect a bigger cap in parallel with the integration cap in the LFO, via a switch. |
Which cap is the integration cap?
EDIT: Ah, must be C54, right? Seeing as it's the only cap in the LFO part of the circuit  |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|