Author |
Message |
KammutierSpule
Joined: Feb 07, 2008 Posts: 40 Location: Aveiro - Portugal
|
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2020 3:46 pm Post subject:
LM13700 OTA with Opamps instead of on-chip darlingtons Subject description: why? |
 |
|
I have seen some designed using the LM13700 OTA that instead of using their on-chip darlington, they use an external Opamp to the effect.
What they are trying to solve by using Opamps? |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ixtern
Joined: Jun 25, 2018 Posts: 145 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2020 4:32 pm Post subject:
Re: LM13700 OTA with Opamps instead of on-chip darlingtons Subject description: why? |
 |
|
KammutierSpule wrote: | I have seen some designed using the LM13700 OTA that instead of using their on-chip darlington, they use an external Opamp to the effect.
What they are trying to solve by using Opamps? |
There may be some answers:
- universal design: as LM13600 and LM13700 buffers are differs slightly, not using buffers allows to use either of them;
- tighter control of circuit parameters: op amps are more predictable then transistors and usually have better parameters;
- a habit: some designers feel better with op amps than transistors. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
PHOBoS

Joined: Jan 14, 2010 Posts: 5792 Location: Moon Base
Audio files: 709
|
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2020 8:08 am Post subject:
Re: LM13700 OTA with Opamps instead of on-chip darlingtons Subject description: why? |
 |
|
ixtern wrote: | a habit: some designers feel better with op amps than transistors. |
Although I don't really design circuits with OTAs I do generally prefer opamps over transistors. Main reason being that opamps can sink AND source
while a transistor can only do one of those things. Also I seem to recall that using the internal darlington transistor of the OTA adds a DC offset which
you will have to compensate. _________________ "My perf, it's full of holes!"
http://phobos.000space.com/
SoundCloud BandCamp MixCloud Stickney Synthyards Captain Collider Twitch YouTube |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
dslamnig
Joined: Dec 18, 2020 Posts: 28 Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Audio files: 6
|
Posted: Sun Feb 07, 2021 10:30 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
From my hands-on experience:
It's the classic observer/observed problem. There's no observation without interaction. In quantum physics (at least the Copenhagen interpretation observation causes the collapse of the wave function.
But back to macroscopic, it's the triangle or saw waveform that will be affected. In the usual VCO core setup a cap is fed a constant current from the OTA, so the voltage rises or decreases linearly - that's the waveform. As long as you don't touch it it's perfect (if we disregard OTA and cap non-linearities). But when you connect a resistor to the ground and the gate of the input transistor of the buffer, the current leaks in a non-linear way and the waveform is compromised.
I found, as a lot of other people before me, that the least invasive way to observe the cap voltage is to connect it (only) to the positive input of an opamp, and wire the opamp as a voltage follower. TL07x has JFET inputs, so the current will only leak to charge the JFET gate cap, and this is much less then when using a buffer.
And yes, there's the buffer output offset problem, too.
I learned all this the hard way when building my dual-core VCO:
https://electro-music.com/forum/topic-72488.html |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|