| Author |
Message |
Andrey Zots
Joined: Nov 08, 2004 Posts: 14 Location: Moscow
G2 patch files: 3
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 10:57 am Post subject:
Midi-clock generator |
 |
|
Can anyone suggest cheap and stable midi clock generator device? It should be hardware. The clock from PC is totally unreliable for our purposes.
thx in advance |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
State Machine
Janitor


Joined: Apr 17, 2006 Posts: 2810 Location: New York
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 5:09 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Well, knowing nothing about your setup, I could suggest that some MIDI controller keyboards generate MIDI clock. Also, do you have any hardware synthesizers at all? If so, for example, I use my Korg MS2000R as a master MIDI clock source and route this through my MIDI patchbay to other gear that act as slaves, and to my computer also. This gives me less deviation between "ticks".
If your like me, you have many older computers hanging around. In a bind, you can always use a spare computer, dust it off, and press it into service for the soul purpose of generating a master MIDI clock. Just run it in a bare minimum configuration to tighten the timing.
You may want to think about why the MIDI clock timing is so bad on your rig. To many background tasks? Running many plug-in's/Instruments? Your MIDI interface and drivers? Many things can hurt the performance of your computer.
Hope some advice helps ....
Bill |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24493 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 298
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 5:55 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Something like an old 386 machine with an MPU401 should be rock solid, or an old Atari, anything really from the time that interrupts were not virtualized yet ... or .. I once had this HD recorder, that one gave a good midi clock as well. _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
paul e.

Joined: Sep 22, 2003 Posts: 1567 Location: toronto, canada
Audio files: 2
|
Posted: Sat Aug 12, 2006 10:03 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
i always say...use MTC instead of MIDI clock if you can..it works more reliably _________________ Spiral Recordings |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
State Machine
Janitor


Joined: Apr 17, 2006 Posts: 2810 Location: New York
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 5:09 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Quote: | | i always say...use MTC instead of MIDI clock if you can..it works more reliably |
MTC is basically SMPTE time code over MIDI right? Wouldn't it take more bytes for each message to convey the absolute time, thus using more MIDI bandwidth?The MIDI clock is only a single byte transfer per tick and has a lot lower overhead. Very suited to keeping things in synchronization without the overhead. Maybe I don't understand it totally. Can you give an example of how you use MTC as an alternative to MIDI Clock?
Thanks for the post .....
Bill |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
State Machine
Janitor


Joined: Apr 17, 2006 Posts: 2810 Location: New York
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 5:10 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Quote: | | Something like an old 386 machine with an MPU401 should be rock solid, or an old Atari, anything really from the time that interrupts were not virtualized yet ... or .. I once had this HD recorder, that one gave a good midi clock as well. |
There you go brother! Thats what I'm talking about Technology reuse!  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
paul e.

Joined: Sep 22, 2003 Posts: 1567 Location: toronto, canada
Audio files: 2
|
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 5:22 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
when using MTC to lock two sequencers, it has the added advantage of following the BPM with frame accuracy
further, if you are syncing two sequencers to bars/beats, MTC will lock the Song Position Pointer accurately
in this case, if i used MIDI Clock, i would have to 'hard start' the sequence at the beginning to send the 'start' command and get good lock-up..
there is no frame by frame ' watchdog' to ensure the MIDI Clock stays tight, like there is in MIDI Time Code
which is why you hear a lot of people talking abbout the BPM's wildy leaping up or down by 1 or 2 BPMS when using MIDI Clock
--
make the 'master' the MTC sender...and you can even set the same sequencer to also spit out Clock for drum machines etc that only have Clock..via the 'thru' _________________ Spiral Recordings |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
paul e.

Joined: Sep 22, 2003 Posts: 1567 Location: toronto, canada
Audio files: 2
|
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 5:37 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
btw..the above really only applies when you are using MIDI to trigger multiple internal sequences from machine to machine,
...which is what i assume the poster is trying to do
unless he is having more of a generic MIDI timing issue related to his PC, in which case perhaps your suggestion is the one to go with _________________ Spiral Recordings |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
State Machine
Janitor


Joined: Apr 17, 2006 Posts: 2810 Location: New York
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:22 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Quote: | when using MTC to lock two sequencers, it has the added advantage of following the BPM with frame accuracy
further, if you are syncing two sequencers to bars/beats, MTC will lock the Song Position Pointer accurately
in this case, if i used MIDI Clock, i would have to 'hard start' the sequence at the beginning to send the 'start' command and get good lock-up..
there is no frame by frame ' watchdog' to ensure the MIDI Clock stays tight, like there is in MIDI Time Code
which is why you hear a lot of people talking abbout the BPM's wildy leaping up or down by 1 or 2 BPMS when using MIDI Clock |
Paul,
Thanks for that fine explanation. I will try to play a bit with MTC in my studio. I have also picked up a another good book on MIDI as well (I like to keep on top of things). I see your point about having to START from the beginning of a sequence when using only MIDI clock. Pain in the ass! MTC will tell everyone where they are in the sequence at all times instead of free running and possibly losing lock .... OK, cool !! When I hear SMPTE or MTC, I think of video and synchronizing multiple camera angles and such and tend not to relate it to my music making.
Thanks again ..... |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Andrey Zots
Joined: Nov 08, 2004 Posts: 14 Location: Moscow
G2 patch files: 3
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 4:12 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Thanks for answers.
At last we used old Korg ER-1 as a master MIDI-clock generator in our setup and it works just fine. Now the clock is really stable. I cant use MTC because our equipment dont support it. Also i dont understand why should we use it in techno music...
Still looking for something smaller then ER-1 because its a gig setup.  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
State Machine
Janitor


Joined: Apr 17, 2006 Posts: 2810 Location: New York
Audio files: 24
|
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 11:28 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Quote: | At last we used old Korg ER-1 as a master MIDI-clock generator in our setup and it works just fine. Now the clock is really stable. I cant use MTC because our equipment dont support it. Also i dont understand why should we use it in techno music...
Still looking for something smaller then ER-1 because its a gig setup. |
OK, yes, I used my Korg EM-1 many times for clock master. Good.
It seems like a small compact master clock/MTC generator might make a great DIY project! Sounds like a challenge!
For now, your ER-1 should do fine and it's really not that big
I know this company will do custom work if you need:
http://www.midisolutions.com/
You might want to give them a shout.
Bill |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|