| Can you actually "play" keybds, or do u just "noodle" around with them? |
| Yes, I can PLAY keyboards in the "tradional" sense. |
|
50% |
[ 8 ] |
| No. I just "play by ear" and/or use 'em as "pitch triggers". |
|
37% |
[ 6 ] |
| Both |
|
12% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 16 |
|
| Author |
Message |
zynthetix
Joined: Jun 12, 2003 Posts: 838 Location: nyc
Audio files: 10
G2 patch files: 13
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 1:12 pm Post subject:
Re: POLL |
 |
|
sorry if my opinion is a bit redundant, BUT:
| Norm Vogel wrote: | | People are viewing this poll, but no one is responding! |
I would respond to your poll, but you don't have an option that says "Both".
When playing a piano (or an electric piano or similar patch), I can only play it in the "traditional" sense...Thats because the timbre/color doesn't change much on such an instrument, so the only thing you can really play with are pitches.
However, on certain synths/patches, it is equally essential to play by ear. Sometimes a patch is not even based on the chromatic scale...sometimes its only the harmonics I'm playing with.
So in short, I'd say "Both" as an answer to your question, and that both playing styles are equally important, yet dependent on what instrument is being played.  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Cyxeris

Joined: Oct 30, 2003 Posts: 1125 Location: Louisville, KY
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 1:41 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I wanted a "neither" option, or "other," but hey, ya know! _________________ ∆ Cyx ∆
"Yeah right, who's the only one here who knows secret illegal ninja moves from the government?"
-Napoleon Dynamite |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jkn

Joined: Mar 14, 2004 Posts: 469 Location: La Porte, IN, USA
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 2:05 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Cyx - definitely agree with your earlier post - they're all just different skills and one doesn't make you more of a musician than another. I consider them all just different approaches - just as some people prefer certain instruments to play or work only with computers, or whatever... |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18257 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 227
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 3:00 pm Post subject:
Re: POLL |
 |
|
| zynthetix wrote: |
I would respond to your poll, but you don't have an option that says "Both".
|
Forgive me Norm, I just added "both". I know this changes the entire meaning of the poll, but let's see what comes of it.
I can play traditional keyboard music, Bach, jazz and stuff. But when I play a patch where the rise and fall times are on the order of 45 seconds, most of the skills involved in that become irrelevant. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
play

Joined: Feb 08, 2004 Posts: 489 Location: behind the mustard
Audio files: 2
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 4:00 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I have some basic keyboard skills, as my mother was a classical pianist and gave me some lessons when I was younger. I still pick up the beethoven now and then but mostly I just noodle around. I have very extensive classical training in guitar. I still practice my arpeggios and rasqueados several hours a week and love to play bach and flamenco but I don't really use these skills when I make electronic music. I think studying classical and to some extent, jazz, has given me a sort of intuitive grasp of melody and harmony which is sometimes helpful (those occassions when I actually use melody in my songs) and studying flamenco really stretched and expanded my sense of rythm.
Though I don't directly use my classical training in composition, i think it's been very valuable. The wider range of experiences we're exposed to, the more resources we have to draw on later. The road to mastery is a series of self-discoveries and internal obstacles overcome. To me, this makes all subjects one subject because what we are learning is not scales and chords but how to think and how to learn. Studying french cuisine has probably helped my music as much as studying western music theory or the fundamentals of synthesis. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Cyxeris

Joined: Oct 30, 2003 Posts: 1125 Location: Louisville, KY
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 5:34 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I play at the keyboard. That is how I interprit my manual musicianship. _________________ ∆ Cyx ∆
"Yeah right, who's the only one here who knows secret illegal ninja moves from the government?"
-Napoleon Dynamite |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
play

Joined: Feb 08, 2004 Posts: 489 Location: behind the mustard
Audio files: 2
|
Posted: Wed Mar 17, 2004 10:41 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Cyxeris wrote: | | I play at the keyboard. |
haha. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 3:11 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
1.) You do not have to understand any kind of notation in order to be a musician/composer.
2.) You do not have to know any formal theory in order to be a musician/composer.
If this was not the case we would not have any music in the first place.
A proper musical education does usually not hurt, but after such an education you cannot neccesarily claim that you make better music or whatever. In some instances education CAN hurt you...
On the other hand, a lot of options and paths are closed if one does not pursue the "proper" education. if this is a bad thing... well.. you decide..
Knowing some theory is cool though.. In some cases I think that knowing some theory is pretty liberating. In the discussion written music vs. improvisation I suggest that both methods are valid and it all depends on how you approach these methods and what you want to achieve. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18257 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 227
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 7:46 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| elektro80 wrote: | | In some instances education CAN hurt you... |
A bit OT, but this is shmooze anyway. As a child, I had piano lessons, but I quit after one year. I learned to play piano and guitar by ear. When I was 21, I started studying music very serious at university. I became a music major. I could not even read music.
The experience was very intense - formal study of music theory, music history, structure and orchestration, not to mention sight singing, ear training, and formal study of the piano. I loved learning this stuff, but at some point I started listening to music differently. Whereas before, I was mostly feeling my responses and reacting emotionally, now I was hearing how the music was constructed. I could hear the harmonic structure, the form, etc. This was horrible! The mystery was gone. I couldn't switch off the internal analyser in my head. I talked to my professor, William Hoskins, about this and he told me to be patient and that in due time I would start to love listening to music again, only moreso. It turned out that he was right, fortunately.
I've talked to many music majors, most have studied music formally from early childhood and could read music when they entered conservatory. Many say they had the same experience.
I think one of the reasons I was attracted to electronic music is that it was always mysterious. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
egw
Stream Operator

Joined: Feb 01, 2003 Posts: 1569 Location: Asheville NC
Audio files: 18
G2 patch files: 8
|
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 8:37 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Knowledge can never hurt, as long as you keep an open mind about it.
Understanding theory can in fact be liberating.
However, Mosc makes a good point about how it can change the way you listen to music. The more I started making my own music, the more I found myself analyzing music that I hear (or especially, watch in performance), rather than just enjoying it. But if the music is really good, I can still get lost in it.
When playing music, I tend to favor styles that are not too technically challenging. This frees the mind to enjoy the process and play more expressively. Also in a group setting it allows the vibe to be established quickly, without need for a lot of practice time. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Cyxeris

Joined: Oct 30, 2003 Posts: 1125 Location: Louisville, KY
|
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 12:40 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
It think there is alot to be said for both methodologies. I think of my music more as a form of architecture than sculpture or painting. It has many roots in theory (although never formally trained, just kind of picked it up as I went and learned in an ad hoc fashion). My music is terribly rigid, stuffy, and anal, admitedly. But this is just me, and how I think, and not so much a reflection of my training or lack thereof. I think it is iportant to recognize and understand when and where one's work may bennefit from a greater understanding of theory, and when or where this understanding might actually be a detriment.
It isnt so much about the tools themselves, but rather the right tool for the right job. _________________ ∆ Cyx ∆
"Yeah right, who's the only one here who knows secret illegal ninja moves from the government?"
-Napoleon Dynamite |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
play

Joined: Feb 08, 2004 Posts: 489 Location: behind the mustard
Audio files: 2
|
Posted: Thu Mar 18, 2004 1:26 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| I have for a long time subscribed to the belief that I should learn as much as I can so I can forget it as quickly as possible. I see studying theory like gesoing canvas. It's optional, but effective and if it's done right you'll never know it happened. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Cyxeris

Joined: Oct 30, 2003 Posts: 1125 Location: Louisville, KY
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2004 3:14 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I will say this much...
My knowlege of theory makes bringing into the world the ideas in my head a MUCH MUCH faster process. _________________ ∆ Cyx ∆
"Yeah right, who's the only one here who knows secret illegal ninja moves from the government?"
-Napoleon Dynamite |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
zynthetix
Joined: Jun 12, 2003 Posts: 838 Location: nyc
Audio files: 10
G2 patch files: 13
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2004 2:56 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| mosc wrote: | | I could hear the harmonic structure, the form, etc. This was horrible! The mystery was gone. I couldn't switch off the internal analyser in my head. |
I had that problem when I was studying music theory and learning some jazz theory on guitar simultaneously. However, a lot of the music I was listening to back then was also guitar based. I've encountered others who have had this problem, yet it was usually resolved by progressing through different types of music as our "ears" and minds did. I think it also makes it more challenging to find music that "tickles your ear" and "gets the creative gears going", but when you find such music, even after much pursuit, it is that much more rewarding.
| Cyx wrote: | | My knowlege of theory makes bringing into the world the ideas in my head a MUCH MUCH faster process. |
Amen. I don't think there is such a thing as having too much theory, but I do see drawbacks in getting "locked into" only the formal approaches. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|