Author |
Message |
numbed
Joined: Oct 20, 2007 Posts: 17 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 7:36 am Post subject:
software and hardware modulars integrations? |
 |
|
hi,
new here and really impressed of whats going on in here!
i figured its the right place to ask this..
i have been twiddling with software modulars for almost 10 years now.
im using max/msp; Reaktor and Modular III with flexor units from the pulsar Scope4.
for a long time i've been wanting to get myself some kind of Hardware analog modular system.
im sure you all appreciate the power of all those softsynths and the endless possibilities that couldn't be achieved with a mountain sized of a hardware system.
but its their sound that doesn't quite SOUND like the real thing.
Except the Flexor which is AMAZING!!! and is nothing like any other soft or digital mod its even takes the Nords in most cases..
but still, raw analog will be RAW analog!
as im pretty broke these days i was looking for a way to get me a fully working modular for less money, so im going to DIY it but thats not enough.
for years i thought i could control/modulate the analog modules Through my AD/DA converters (A16 Ultra).
that way i wont need to get/build the LFOs, Envelopes and such..
and will use my endless amount of whatever i want as modulation sources from these softsynths.
but i made this test a couple of years ago, and it seems that its pretty impossible to send/receive low frequencies and Envelopes Through my converters as they cut the "bad" DC from the signals end totally kill the modulation signal... if it is high freq stuff it could work...
here is an illustration of the signal being recorded:
Left channel is a recording of Modular III modulators straight to Soundforge (via internal routing in the Pulsar working zone SFP)
Right channel is sent out to my converters and being recorded back.
is there a DC filter "free" DA/AD so it wouldn't do this?
i think it could save us all allot of money roomspace and ..girlfriends. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbed
Joined: Oct 20, 2007 Posts: 17 Location: UK
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24423 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 297
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 8:19 am Post subject:
Re: software and hardware modulars integrations? |
 |
|
numbed wrote: | is there a DC filter "free" DA/AD so it wouldn't do this? |
numbed
I'm not aware of any audio interfaces that have no DC blocking, which doesn't mean they don't exist. I saw a remark for some RME system suggesting it had a DC path for it's inputs - it's the outputs though that you seem interested in.
There are DA/AD cards for technical use (test and measurement systems) that are DC coupled,but I'm not aware of any having audio drivers - meaning that those would need custom software.
I know of people who have modified the signal path of their Nord Modular G2 synth to get the DC blocking out. This might be an option with some audio cards as well - we might even have a thread about that buried somewhere in this site, I seem to remember that vaguely, but where  _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24423 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 297
G2 patch files: 320
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
jksuperstar

Joined: Aug 20, 2004 Posts: 2503 Location: Denver
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 18
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:36 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
If you have a cheap sound card (or are daring), you can do similar mods to any sound card. It's typically the series cap on the input signal that filters DC. However, DC can blow a converter, so it should have some form of protection (optoisolation, etc).
another method, if you know your signals are bandwidth limited, is to FM or AM modulate them, send them through the DAC-- then demodulate them on the other side. There is a project, openeeg on sourceforge, which attempts to make an EEG (brainwave detector) for use with a soundcard. brainwaves are typically very low frequency, so this is the method they use to get through the soundcard. 80db signal...that's about 14-15 bits of dac, good enough for a lot of low-freq work. Though, that's also dealing with a lot of gain on really low level signals, so you would probably get better results with audio. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbed
Joined: Oct 20, 2007 Posts: 17 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 5:04 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
hi,
thanks for your interest and response guys!
well for start im pretty sure my "test" isnt so accurate cuz:
as you said
Quote: | I'm not aware of any audio interfaces that have no DC blocking, which doesn't mean they don't exist. I saw a remark for some RME system suggesting it had a DC path for it's inputs - it's the outputs though that you seem interested in.
|
meaning probably that the output could be DC free and my input cuts it, so you can not see the actual output right?
but i only did this test because it didnt sound right when i modulated my Sherman Filter with simple sine LFO.
so my guess that if its not like the picture i posted its half as bad, which is still, bad...
i dont think i have to have a dedicated sound card for this though,
it will be much cooler if i could find a low budget ADAT converters like behringer's or Alesis and Modify it and connect it via my ADAT holes. no?
and jksuperstar,
the thing looks great i wanted to try neurofeedback since i first saw it on tv! and its seems like a great idea but im not sure how to even start encoding and decoding this waveforms.. i think im gonna advice with a technician about this!
if i can get just 8 outputs from my Converters to modulate vcos and vcfs - i'll pay good money, it will surely be much cheaper then 8 analog modulators.. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24423 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 297
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 5:08 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Sure, why not
You'll have to find the output capacitors, and then you just short those. _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbed
Joined: Oct 20, 2007 Posts: 17 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 6:01 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
hah! i try it with an Amp Mod and it got to be ALMOST accurate....
http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/1696/testsofdasignalswith22kuq7.gif
how do i deAmp now??
thanks jksuperstar for the original idea.
so Blue Hell,
your saying straight up, that if i move them output capacitors it will work flawless?? that simple??
that will be the best and most effective way i think..
you believe one can check this without harming the circuit and solder out stuff? like checking it from an earlier point on the board?
Forums Kick Ass. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24423 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 297
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 6:30 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
numbed wrote: | your saying straight up, that if i move them output capacitors it will work flawless?? |
I'm not sure what you mean by "move" maybe some detail got lost in the language conversions ... the idea is to bridge the caps with a blob of solder or a bit of wire, not to re?move 'm as that would bring silence, they must be turned into a wire, so to say.
I see no problem then ... maybe others do .. we'll see. It will void your warranty of course, and you might fuck up and blow the thing, just the normal risks of modding stuff
Re. the amp mod, from the graphs I think you multiplied a slow signal with a fast one to get it through the DC blocking, if so you'd need an envelope follower to reconstruct the slow signal. An envelope follower basically is a rectifier followed by a low pass filter. When your high frequency is high enough, and your amplitude is high enough (which might not be the case) that would amount a diode, a resistor and a capacitor. (and other wise some active elements would e needed as well, and a power supply & all). _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbed
Joined: Oct 20, 2007 Posts: 17 Location: UK
|
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 7:02 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
.....waiting for an oscilloscope, maybe i can crack something...
if it still concern someone, il post whatever answers i get.
also thinking about an audio to CC plug, out to a midi to cv converter...
do you think il get the same result as regard to resolution?
thanks |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24423 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 297
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2007 2:22 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
numbed wrote: | .....waiting for an oscilloscope, maybe i can crack something...
if it still concern someone, il post whatever answers i get. |
Ah, good idea, a scope would be very useful ! _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
REwire

Joined: Dec 06, 2006 Posts: 56 Location: Los Angeles, CA USA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:45 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I use a Modular Midi to CV converter that has one Midi Input and a bunch of CV Outputs. I can take CC#'s in and send CV to any number of modular controls. The 127 units of CV values going to -5 to +5v or -10 to +10v gives very precise control from midi controllers like my Korg Kaoss Pad, Midi clock driven arpeggios coming from my VirusC or envelopes I create in Cubase.
Also, an Envelope Follower in a modular can take sound and amplitude as the basis for modulations so that would open up more possibilities for live control from any sound source and avoid these DC problems. _________________ http://www.REwireMusic.com
Buy REwire - "Bit By Bit" CD at http://cdbaby.com/cd/rewire
Album Promo Video:HERE |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbed
Joined: Oct 20, 2007 Posts: 17 Location: UK
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 5:50 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hi REwire,
thanks for the info,,
i was thinking about that idea, as i mentioned earlier.. but didnt know of any one that do it, i mean, is it fast enough for regular not padish ADSRs??
the only thing left for me to do, is to check if i can send an envelope to my sherman II throw my Pulse plus CV out..
if that be the case, you guys recommend Kenton Pro2000??
or is there something cheaper/more cost effective/more outputs..
im not sure what you meant about env follower.. i have one in my sherman,
you mean i can trigger it and use the ADSR output? im aware of that.
its just that i want MORE facilities (and envelopes) for creating complex modular patches at low cost and get the character from the filters and OSCs and focus my money one these kind of modules. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
REwire

Joined: Dec 06, 2006 Posts: 56 Location: Los Angeles, CA USA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 8:50 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
The Pro2000 has 6 Aux CV outputs, so you could use that well.
As for an Envelope Follower; the one in the Sherman creates Envelopes based on the Amplitude of the incoming audio. In modular form, like the Doepfer A-119, you can plug in a microphone for example and say "Boom" and make a Filter open and close real fast.
Essentially, the Midi Route is necessary if you want to use knobs or other midi generating data in software or other synths. The Envelope Follower is if you want to control the modular from sounds like voices, drum loops or anything. _________________ http://www.REwireMusic.com
Buy REwire - "Bit By Bit" CD at http://cdbaby.com/cd/rewire
Album Promo Video:HERE |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
iPassenger

Joined: Jan 27, 2007 Posts: 1068 Location: Sheffield, UK
Audio files: 5
G2 patch files: 78
|
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 7:16 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
on a similar note my CS15 has a trig level, which triggers its internal envelopes from a high enough input audio signal, and hence beats can trigger the envelopes etc...Sounds sharp enough to me, tho i dont think the CS15's enevelopes are exactly break neck speed. _________________ iP (Ross)
- http://ipassenger.bandcamp.com
- http://soundcloud.com/ipassenger |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
daantje
Joined: Dec 04, 2006 Posts: 2 Location: Den Haag
|
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 6:48 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hi,
Have you ever thought of using OSC? (and an interface like http://www.koncon.nl/ipsonlab )
I don't know if Modular III understands OSC. But max and reaktor do, right?
This way you will probably have enough ins and outs... I've been using it for a couple of weeks now,
and it seems stable enough even for slow envelopes... (Or maybe it's easier for me to get help with this stuff since I work there )
Most people I know use a doepfer MCV 24 for this stuff, but I find your approach way more interesting! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
varice

Joined: Dec 29, 2004 Posts: 961 Location: Northeastern shore of Toledo Bend
Audio files: 29
G2 patch files: 54
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:04 am Post subject:
Re: software and hardware modulars integrations? |
 |
|
I'm sorry that I had not seen this topic earlier.
Blue Hell wrote: | ...I know of people who have modified the signal path of their Nord Modular G2 synth to get the DC blocking out. This might be an option with some audio cards as well - we might even have a thread about that buried somewhere in this site, I seem to remember that vaguely, but where  |
Perhaps my topic is the one that Blue Hell has a vague memory of?
Here is a link to my post about how I modified my Clavia Nord Modular G2X to get a CV output to control the cutoff frequency of a Moog MF-101 moogerfooger Low Pass Filter:
http://electro-music.com/forum/topic-12266.html
This mod gives me a very high resolution 24 bit CV output - from DC voltage level to very high frequency - far better than any MIDI to CV convertor can produce. If any of your software synths allow you to patch CV signals to audio outputs, then bypassing any DC blocking capacitors on your audio output hardware will allow you get these signals to control external devices.
An issue that you will probably need to account for - the maximum and minimum voltage output levels of your audio output device may be different than what is needed to control external synth modules. For example, my G2X output voltage swing is less than +4 to -4 VDC. The moogerfooger filter mormally needs a +5 to -5 VDC signal for the frequency cutoff input. But, I was able to modify the moogerfooger as described in my topic to make it work with the lower G2X output level.
I have not tested the modified G2X output to see if it would be accurate enough to use for VCO pitch signals, but it sure works fantastically as a CV output for the complex modulation signals that the G2 modules can produce! _________________ varice |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24423 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 297
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 9:33 am Post subject:
Re: software and hardware modulars integrations? |
 |
|
varice wrote: | Perhaps my topic is the one that Blue Hell has a vague memory of? |
Yup, and now I see that Sven (3phase) also posted in that thread I remember that he modified his G2 as well. Thanks for refreshing my memory. _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbed
Joined: Oct 20, 2007 Posts: 17 Location: UK
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|