Author |
Message |
softfin

Joined: Oct 11, 2006 Posts: 271 Location: Far in the north
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 7:33 am Post subject:
Need help choosing a high quality reverb Subject description: hardware or software |
 |
|
I'm currently working on a total of six records that I'm hoping to release at the end of the summer or early fall.
Phew, this far this project has been quite a challenge: mixing tunes all day long for two weeks now ... Before entering the mastering stage I've found that many tracks (especially the ones with vocals) would benefit from high quality reverb(s) and I really don't have a good enough reverb to use.
Would appreciate to hear about your experiences with different types of hardware reverbs and software ones also.
Thanks.
EDIT: I've been considering TC Electronic M-One XL and Lexicon MX400 as they're in the price range I could afford. So I'm looking for something that wouldn't cost much more than about 500eur. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 3:15 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
If you are going to add reverb in the mix now, then I suggest you go for software for now. Software reverbs give you more bang for the bucks if you are working on a DAW. In general, you will have 3-30 times more for comparable hardware reverbs. I´m not saying that hardware reverbs is a bad idea, but if you don´t need outboard reverb devices right now, then software is a far better choice.
Altiverb is very good. The UAD-1 reverbs are extremely good.
My suggestion is to both get a good convolution reverb ( + IR files for the one you choose) as well as something like the Universal Audio Realverb Pro and DreamVerb. But.. if you feel like you need reverbs, then you should also consider chorus and delay plugins. And when you do that then you might as well also consider compressor plugins. But you have some of those already? _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Jyoti

Joined: Mar 07, 2008 Posts: 618 Location: Derby, UK
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 7:32 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I'm going to respectfully disagree with elektro80 and tell you to perhaps check out a secondhand Lexicon MPX1. Or even a new Alesis Nanoverb. Or, for a proper low-price, high-fun fix, the Behringer DR-100 rev pedal.
To pre-empt any possible offence, I must say that this is entirely a subjective thing, I just prefer how hardware reverbs sound. I'm not saying they're better, I just like them more!
I use the MPX1 as my main reverb, patching it into Logic is very easy and the results are always musical and tweakable. The snare short plate in particular gives a lovely feel.
I use the Nanoverb in-line with my Voyager. I love the fact it's tweakable and it's so quick to get a lush sound that seems to mesh with the obesity of the Voyager perfectly.
I use the Behringer on guitars (natch) and drum machines. It's got a nice spring emulation that sounds wonderful on old-skool drum machines. And a big, chorussy Cocteaus reverb too. Really, for the £30 it costs, you can't go wrong.
Hardware reverbs can be expensive, if you're looking at the new Eventides, Lexicons or Bricasti. But that doesn't mean they all are, particularly since in the scramble to "in-the-box" recording, people are selling off old units at silly prices. Kind of reminds me of when everyone sold off their "dinosaur" analogues in the '80s, knowing that the new digital synths were soo much better!  _________________ My music: here! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Sun Jul 06, 2008 11:30 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Pretty much all of what you would call "hardware reverbs" these days are in fact digital software reverbs. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Jyoti

Joined: Mar 07, 2008 Posts: 618 Location: Derby, UK
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:11 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Yes, of course, albeit running on optimised DSPs (like the UAD and TC plugins do too). Ideally, we'd all have the space and budget for one of these:
Now, that's what I call a real hardware reverb!  _________________ My music: here! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
softfin

Joined: Oct 11, 2006 Posts: 271 Location: Far in the north
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:47 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
elektro80 wrote: | If you are going to add reverb in the mix now, then I suggest you go for software for now. Software reverbs give you more bang for the bucks if you are working on a DAW. In general, you will have 3-30 times more for comparable hardware reverbs. I´m not saying that hardware reverbs is a bad idea, but if you don´t need outboard reverb devices right now, then software is a far better choice.
Altiverb is very good. The UAD-1 reverbs are extremely good.
My suggestion is to both get a good convolution reverb ( + IR files for the one you choose) as well as something like the Universal Audio Realverb Pro and DreamVerb. But.. if you feel like you need reverbs, then you should also consider chorus and delay plugins. And when you do that then you might as well also consider compressor plugins. But you have some of those already? |
Yes. The UAD-1 seems very nice as it's not very expensive, but offers quite a lot of what I'd need. I usually record almost everything dry and use effects afterwards, so a good pack of software effects would be the best choice for now, I think. I just hope the UAD-1 wouldn't eat much CPU power (?).
Jyoti wrote: |
I just prefer how hardware reverbs sound. I'm not saying they're better, I just like them more! | I see your point. Sometimes it's simply inspiring to mess with some effects when playing and not just process the stuff afterwards!
Jyoti wrote: | Hardware reverbs can be expensive, if you're looking at the new Eventides, Lexicons or Bricasti. But that doesn't mean they all are, particularly since in the scramble to "in-the-box" recording, people are selling off old units at silly prices. Kind of reminds me of when everyone sold off their "dinosaur" analogues in the '80s, knowing that the new digital synths were soo much better! | This is so true, and reminds me of when I bought an analogue peak limiter last year for a very low price that would have cost about ten times more if bought new. It's good to have one's eyes open on Ebay at times like these
Jyoti wrote: | Ideally, we'd all have the space and budget for one of these:
Posted Image, might have been reduced in size. Click Image to view fullscreen.
Now, that's what I call a real hardware reverb! |
Those plate reverbs are quite massive! I haven't really heard one for real, only on some 70s/80s dub records. Adorable sounds, but man, I wouldn't fit in my studio anymore if I bought one of those
Thanks for your advice Stein and Jyoti! It's much appreciated. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Jyoti

Joined: Mar 07, 2008 Posts: 618 Location: Derby, UK
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:14 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
softfin wrote: | I see your point. Sometimes it's simply inspiring to mess with some effects when playing and not just process the stuff afterwards! |
Like all of music, the science of reverbs becomes secondary to the subjective feel (or, as I prefer to call it, magic). In fact, it becomes so hyper-subjective, it's almost pointless giving advice. For example, I hate mousing around when I'm doing music. I prefer grabbing faders, twiddling rotaries, banging shit with a hammer. So, of course, I'm going to prefer hardware reverbs.
Can I say scientifically that they are higher-quality reverbs than their native plugin siblings? (NOTE: I'm excluding revs running on DSP cards like the UAD here.) Absolutely not. But then, I'm a musician, not a scientist. In the end, I just trust my ears and gut feeling. I go with what makes me feel good.
Quote: | This is so true, and reminds me of when I bought an analogue peak limiter last year for a very low price that would have cost about ten times more if bought new. It's good to have one's eyes open on Ebay at times like these  |
Yep, yep! These are good times for hardware fiends!
Quote: | Those plate reverbs are quite massive! I haven't really heard one for real, only on some 70s/80s dub records. Adorable sounds, but man, I wouldn't fit in my studio anymore if I bought one of those  |
One day, I will have my own massive plate reverb. I'll install it in the roof space above my live room. Oh yes.
In the meantime, I may get one of these babies:
Mmmm...
Quote: |
Thanks for your advice Stein and Jyoti! It's much appreciated. |
No problem!  _________________ My music: here! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Jyoti

Joined: Mar 07, 2008 Posts: 618 Location: Derby, UK
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:19 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
As a slightly off-topic point: have you considered using a real reverb? In the early '80s, before I could afford even an analogue delay let alone a digital reverb (Quantec Room Simulator, anyone?), I used to mic-up my Mum's kitchen as it had a long, tiled extension. Pipe the snare through to a speaker, lovely reverb off that!
Similarly, if you plan ahead, you can transfer say a snare or vocal track to a four track, go out to your fave space (I've used empty venues in the past) and record the reverb from there.
In the end, nothing beats real reverb. It's just a bugger to get!  _________________ My music: here! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
softfin

Joined: Oct 11, 2006 Posts: 271 Location: Far in the north
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 6:08 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Jyoti wrote: | As a slightly off-topic point: have you considered using a real reverb?
In the end, nothing beats real reverb. It's just a bugger to get!  |
Good ideas I've actually considered doing exactly that, but haven't experimented in this field yet due to lack of equipment to play back tracks at different locations. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
kkissinger
Stream Operator

Joined: Mar 28, 2006 Posts: 1430 Location: Kansas City, Mo USA
Audio files: 45
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 1:37 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
elektro80 wrote: | Pretty much all of what you would call "hardware reverbs" these days are in fact digital software reverbs. |
Yes, a true statement. The MX-400 has s/pdif i/o, thus one could work around the additional d/a -> a/d -> reverb -> d/a -> a/d conversions.
If you decide to go with an outboard reverb and you need to use analog connections, I suggest that you use your reverb as a SEND effect rather than an INSERT. That way, only the reverberated signal is subject to any degradation due to all the d/a, a/d conversions. (that is, you will mix the wet reverb signal with the original (unprocessed) tracks). _________________ -- Kevin
http://kevinkissinger.com |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:04 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I´m in fact considering to buy more outboard reverbs, but that is only because I use reverb a lot for sound shaping within patches and now I think it would be smart to have some reverbs and compressors in the same cabinet I have the main bulk of dotcom modules.
"Real reverb" or room ambience or whatever is also highly useful sometimes, but I don´t think that is in any way better than using various reverb plugins. It is just different.
My own use of reverb pretty much goes like this:
1. I use reverb within patches or as part of the signal processing when recording a live signal. Few would really recognize this as reverb.
2. I use reverb in the monitoring mixes in order ( but I don´t record this ). I should add that a performance is often very affected by the amount of reverb you throw in.
3. I use mainly reverb plugins when mixing. Apart from that I use whatever feels right. I also reamp tracks and record them off speakers. Oh.. and I often actually record synths that way anyway, even if I am using softsynths. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Jyoti

Joined: Mar 07, 2008 Posts: 618 Location: Derby, UK
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 3:16 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
elektro80 wrote: | I also reamp tracks and record them off speakers. Oh.. and I often actually record synths that way anyway, even if I am using softsynths. |
Oh yeah... synths sound lovely through my VHT guitar amp!  _________________ My music: here! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
softfin

Joined: Oct 11, 2006 Posts: 271 Location: Far in the north
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 4:18 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
kkissinger wrote: | elektro80 wrote: | Pretty much all of what you would call "hardware reverbs" these days are in fact digital software reverbs. |
Yes, a true statement. The MX-400 has s/pdif i/o, thus one could work around the additional d/a -> a/d -> reverb -> d/a -> a/d conversions.
If you decide to go with an outboard reverb and you need to use analog connections, I suggest that you use your reverb as a SEND effect rather than an INSERT. That way, only the reverberated signal is subject to any degradation due to all the d/a, a/d conversions. (that is, you will mix the wet reverb signal with the original (unprocessed) tracks). |
Good point here as well. I've been trying to avoid excess d/a&a/d conversions and therefore my outboard chains are completely analog at the moment. If I end up adding digital outboard gear to my setup, I'll probably use s/pdif like you suggested.
elektro80 wrote: |
I also reamp tracks and record them off speakers. Oh.. and I often actually record synths that way anyway, even if I am using softsynths. |
This is an interesting technique! I guess I should experiment more in this field too. I've had a Fender Deluxe Reverb amp for some years and I use it quite rarely when compared to my main guitar amp...it has that creamy, long spring reverb that would be very useful for a lot of tracks...
OK! I'll put it in some serious use now and hook up a mono output from my DAW to it !
Thanks again for your helpful posts.  |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|