electro-music.com   Dedicated to experimental electro-acoustic
and electronic music
 
    Front Page  |  Radio
 |  Media  |  Forum  |  Wiki  |  Links
Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
 FAQFAQ   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   LinksLinks
 RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in  Chat RoomChat Room 
 Forum index » DIY Hardware and Software » Ken Stone designs - CGS
cgs58 lfo cv->speed?
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: Scott Stites
Page 1 of 1 [17 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
wetterberg



Joined: Jun 27, 2008
Posts: 48
Location: denmark

PostPosted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:45 pm    Post subject: cgs58 lfo cv->speed?
Subject description: - can it be done?
Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

hey all,
I was hoping to find this mod described in this forum but no luck, apparently...

is it possible to inject CV into this circuit to control the speed of the LFOs?
Perhaps mixing the wiper output from the Speed potentiometer with incoming CV? From what I understand that pot. is basically acting as a voltage divider here, right?

Any help would be awesome. I know I should probably experiment with low-voltage DC here, but I really don't want to fry up shit on a whim like in my circuitbending days Wink

Cheers
andreas
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
andrewF



Joined: Dec 29, 2006
Posts: 1176
Location: australia
Audio files: 4

PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Hi
this question is asked regularly, but I cannot recall anybody offering a solution....except perhaps building a VC LFO from another source. This cct was never designed to be CV controlled.

I don't think injecting a CV signal to the wiper of the 'speed' pot will help. This pot is processing the output of the Schmitt trigger stage, not a CV or DC voltage.

A possiblity would be a LDR/LED combo or vactrol, with the LDR connected between the speed pot's wiper and the node of the speed pot and the 4k7 resistor or maybe to pin 8? There are plenty of ccts out there for driving a vactrol with a CV signal.

It would be hard...impossible... to get precise control and the degree of control from the CV signal would be affected by the setting of the pot.

have fun Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
wetterberg



Joined: Jun 27, 2008
Posts: 48
Location: denmark

PostPosted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Cheers, Andrew.

You know, I would have thought so too, but for the life of me I can't find the threads for those mods? Confused so weird.

Yeah, I already have some (four, I believe) vactrol circuits from Bridechamber ready to roll, so that's always a possibility - I'm not looking for precise control in any shape or form, just a nice way to freak the LFO out, really.

I have two Doepfer 147 vcLFOs, which crossmodulate in the nicest of ways - lfo out->cv in->lfo out->cv in, that sort of thing. Really simple, actually.

Righto, I'll build these up, then go nuts with the DMM/scope to see what I can do with this.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
electang



Joined: Dec 20, 2007
Posts: 15
Location: fr

PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Yeah, I already have some (four, I believe) vactrol circuits from Bridechamber ready to roll, so that's always a possibility - I'm not looking for precise control in any shape or form, just a nice way to freak the LFO out, really.


You 'll be satisfied. Smile I have tested this and it does vc control the frequency but at the expense of a tremendous and continous drift making it useless as vc clock Crying or Very sad
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wetterberg



Joined: Jun 27, 2008
Posts: 48
Location: denmark

PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

good to know! Very Happy

And thanks for the info re. stability under vactrol control - I'll be sure to add a switch to punch it in or out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
synthmonger



Joined: Nov 16, 2006
Posts: 578
Location: flada
Audio files: 3

PostPosted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

donpo55 wrote:


You 'll be satisfied. Smile I have tested this and it does vc control the frequency but at the expense of a tremendous and continous drift making it useless as vc clock Crying or Very sad



What current source are you using to drive the vactrol? I've used an expo and linear transistor source with very minimal drift, only a punchy glide..though I may be wrong I haven't tried it out in quite a while. I used a fast vactrol too. I do find vactrols to be useless when controlling oscillators because of the slight attack. Fun with noise gizmos, but vcos and lfos I'll pass.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
electang



Joined: Dec 20, 2007
Posts: 15
Location: fr

PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

[quote="synthmonger"]
donpo55 wrote:


You 'll be satisfied. Smile I have tested this and it does vc control the frequency but at the expense of a tremendous and continous drift making it useless as vc clock Crying or Very sad



What current source are you using to drive the vactrol?


I just used the Bridechamber pcb
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
synthmonger



Joined: Nov 16, 2006
Posts: 578
Location: flada
Audio files: 3

PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 1:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Did you use the vactrol he sells? That's a slow resistor you may wanna up it to a VTL5C4 i think thats the fastest.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
electang



Joined: Dec 20, 2007
Posts: 15
Location: fr

PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 4:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

synthmonger wrote:
Did you use the vactrol he sells? That's a slow resistor you may wanna up it to a VTL5C4 i think thats the fastest.


I use VCTL 5C3/2
I dismantled this circuity so I cannot do further test
maybe my mistake was wanting to use it as a VC clock
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
otherunicorn



Joined: May 11, 2008
Posts: 136
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 1:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Quite frankly, I wouldn't bother trying to voltage control oscillators using this core. That is why I called it the utility LFO i.e. plain, minimum options. You really need a ca3080 at the core instead of plain old op-amps. One day I''' get around to it, but don't hold your breath. You are better off just using a VCO with a divided output, or running really slow.
_________________
http://www.cgs.synth.net/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
wetterberg



Joined: Jun 27, 2008
Posts: 48
Location: denmark

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

otherunicorn wrote:
Quite frankly, I wouldn't bother trying to voltage control oscillators using this core. That is why I called it the utility LFO i.e. plain, minimum options. You really need a ca3080 at the core instead of plain old op-amps. One day I''' get around to it, but don't hold your breath. You are better off just using a VCO with a divided output, or running really slow.
Thanks for your input Very Happy

However, I'd say a dual utility LFO with two vactrol-ish things attached is a MUCH MUCH MUCH easier build than building two VCOs Shocked
- again, I'm not looking for precision, 1v/oct, ANY sort of proper tracking, really - not even temporal precision with varying cv input - think more wogglebug, less proper control Wink

*IF* that fails I'd love some pointers on how to do a stripped build of your VCO - that would certainly come in handy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
andrewF



Joined: Dec 29, 2006
Posts: 1176
Location: australia
Audio files: 4

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

wetterberg wrote:


*IF* that fails I'd love some pointers on how to do a stripped build of your VCO - that would certainly come in handy.


That would be Richard Brewster's version -
http://pugix.com/synth/cgs-vco-project/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
wetterberg



Joined: Jun 27, 2008
Posts: 48
Location: denmark

PostPosted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

andrewF wrote:
wetterberg wrote:


*IF* that fails I'd love some pointers on how to do a stripped build of your VCO - that would certainly come in handy.


That would be Richard Brewster's version -
http://pugix.com/synth/cgs-vco-project/

cheers. hmmm. I've been over there before... I wish there were a less techy approach, though. CGS-as-seen-from-the-noob, as it were. I guess that'll have to be me Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bugbrand



Joined: Nov 27, 2005
Posts: 846
Location: Bristol, UK
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 1

PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 2:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Hey - check out the CA3080 cookbook from Thomas Henry (available from Magic Smoke, I think?) - the VCO design is basically the standard utility LFO design but with an OTA replacing the manual speed control. You could, of course, make a double using an LM13700.

Actually the THVCO1 is this sort of design:
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/scottnoanh/birthofasynth/id33.html
...though it uses a discreet transistor based comparator section (opamp in the standard utility LFO design)

_________________
http://www.bugbrand.co.uk
http://www.bugbrand.blogspot.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
zthee



Joined: Feb 20, 2008
Posts: 414
Location: Stockholm

PostPosted: Tue Apr 07, 2009 1:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

wetterberg wrote:
andrewF wrote:
wetterberg wrote:


*IF* that fails I'd love some pointers on how to do a stripped build of your VCO - that would certainly come in handy.


That would be Richard Brewster's version -
http://pugix.com/synth/cgs-vco-project/

cheers. hmmm. I've been over there before... I wish there were a less techy approach, though. CGS-as-seen-from-the-noob, as it were. I guess that'll have to be me Wink


Just skip the orange parts and you got a simple VCO Smile

Though the to part might be fun to have.. Since you can invert the gain of incomming CV banana


schem_cgs48_vco.gif
 Description:
 Filesize:  24.37 KB
 Viewed:  336 Time(s)
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge.

schem_cgs48_vco.gif



_________________
http://www.thehumancomparator.net/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ericcoleridge



Joined: Jan 16, 2007
Posts: 889
Location: NYC

PostPosted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

For me, I would have more use with a sync/reset input on the utility LFOs; I'm wondering if there would be a 'simple' way to implement sync? I know that I've accomplished a reasonable reset on my MFOS LFO by just inserting a gate signal at the timing capacitor.

Of course there's tons of LFOs out there that are designed with sync, VC, etc. But, I particularly like these Utility LFOs, for a number of reasons. They remind me of the LFOs on the MS20.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wetterberg



Joined: Jun 27, 2008
Posts: 48
Location: denmark

PostPosted: Sat Apr 25, 2009 2:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

ericcoleridge wrote:
For me, I would have more use with a sync/reset input on the utility LFOs; I'm wondering if there would be a 'simple' way to implement sync? I know that I've accomplished a reasonable reset on my MFOS LFO by just inserting a gate signal at the timing capacitor.

Of course there's tons of LFOs out there that are designed with sync, VC, etc. But, I particularly like these Utility LFOs, for a number of reasons. They remind me of the LFOs on the MS20.
I did read a description about how to do a reset with the Utility LFOs - I believe it's on this forum, too?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: Scott Stites
Page 1 of 1 [17 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
 Forum index » DIY Hardware and Software » Ken Stone designs - CGS
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Copyright © 2003 through 2009 by electro-music.com - Conditions Of Use