Author |
Message |
wetterberg
Joined: Jun 27, 2008 Posts: 48 Location: denmark
|
Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:45 pm Post subject:
cgs58 lfo cv->speed? Subject description: - can it be done? |
|
|
hey all,
I was hoping to find this mod described in this forum but no luck, apparently...
is it possible to inject CV into this circuit to control the speed of the LFOs?
Perhaps mixing the wiper output from the Speed potentiometer with incoming CV? From what I understand that pot. is basically acting as a voltage divider here, right?
Any help would be awesome. I know I should probably experiment with low-voltage DC here, but I really don't want to fry up shit on a whim like in my circuitbending days
Cheers
andreas |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
andrewF
Joined: Dec 29, 2006 Posts: 1176 Location: australia
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:51 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Hi
this question is asked regularly, but I cannot recall anybody offering a solution....except perhaps building a VC LFO from another source. This cct was never designed to be CV controlled.
I don't think injecting a CV signal to the wiper of the 'speed' pot will help. This pot is processing the output of the Schmitt trigger stage, not a CV or DC voltage.
A possiblity would be a LDR/LED combo or vactrol, with the LDR connected between the speed pot's wiper and the node of the speed pot and the 4k7 resistor or maybe to pin 8? There are plenty of ccts out there for driving a vactrol with a CV signal.
It would be hard...impossible... to get precise control and the degree of control from the CV signal would be affected by the setting of the pot.
have fun |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
wetterberg
Joined: Jun 27, 2008 Posts: 48 Location: denmark
|
Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:47 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Cheers, Andrew.
You know, I would have thought so too, but for the life of me I can't find the threads for those mods? so weird.
Yeah, I already have some (four, I believe) vactrol circuits from Bridechamber ready to roll, so that's always a possibility - I'm not looking for precise control in any shape or form, just a nice way to freak the LFO out, really.
I have two Doepfer 147 vcLFOs, which crossmodulate in the nicest of ways - lfo out->cv in->lfo out->cv in, that sort of thing. Really simple, actually.
Righto, I'll build these up, then go nuts with the DMM/scope to see what I can do with this. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
electang
Joined: Dec 20, 2007 Posts: 15 Location: fr
|
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:07 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Yeah, I already have some (four, I believe) vactrol circuits from Bridechamber ready to roll, so that's always a possibility - I'm not looking for precise control in any shape or form, just a nice way to freak the LFO out, really.
You 'll be satisfied. I have tested this and it does vc control the frequency but at the expense of a tremendous and continous drift making it useless as vc clock |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
wetterberg
Joined: Jun 27, 2008 Posts: 48 Location: denmark
|
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:15 am Post subject:
|
|
|
good to know!
And thanks for the info re. stability under vactrol control - I'll be sure to add a switch to punch it in or out. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
synthmonger
Joined: Nov 16, 2006 Posts: 578 Location: flada
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:50 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
donpo55 wrote: |
You 'll be satisfied. I have tested this and it does vc control the frequency but at the expense of a tremendous and continous drift making it useless as vc clock |
What current source are you using to drive the vactrol? I've used an expo and linear transistor source with very minimal drift, only a punchy glide..though I may be wrong I haven't tried it out in quite a while. I used a fast vactrol too. I do find vactrols to be useless when controlling oscillators because of the slight attack. Fun with noise gizmos, but vcos and lfos I'll pass. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
electang
Joined: Dec 20, 2007 Posts: 15 Location: fr
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:53 am Post subject:
|
|
|
[quote="synthmonger"] donpo55 wrote: |
You 'll be satisfied. I have tested this and it does vc control the frequency but at the expense of a tremendous and continous drift making it useless as vc clock |
What current source are you using to drive the vactrol?
I just used the Bridechamber pcb |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
synthmonger
Joined: Nov 16, 2006 Posts: 578 Location: flada
Audio files: 3
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 1:20 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Did you use the vactrol he sells? That's a slow resistor you may wanna up it to a VTL5C4 i think thats the fastest. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
electang
Joined: Dec 20, 2007 Posts: 15 Location: fr
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 4:32 am Post subject:
|
|
|
synthmonger wrote: | Did you use the vactrol he sells? That's a slow resistor you may wanna up it to a VTL5C4 i think thats the fastest. |
I use VCTL 5C3/2
I dismantled this circuity so I cannot do further test
maybe my mistake was wanting to use it as a VC clock |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
otherunicorn
Joined: May 11, 2008 Posts: 136 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 1:36 am Post subject:
|
|
|
Quite frankly, I wouldn't bother trying to voltage control oscillators using this core. That is why I called it the utility LFO i.e. plain, minimum options. You really need a ca3080 at the core instead of plain old op-amps. One day I''' get around to it, but don't hold your breath. You are better off just using a VCO with a divided output, or running really slow. _________________ http://www.cgs.synth.net/ |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
wetterberg
Joined: Jun 27, 2008 Posts: 48 Location: denmark
|
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:23 am Post subject:
|
|
|
otherunicorn wrote: | Quite frankly, I wouldn't bother trying to voltage control oscillators using this core. That is why I called it the utility LFO i.e. plain, minimum options. You really need a ca3080 at the core instead of plain old op-amps. One day I''' get around to it, but don't hold your breath. You are better off just using a VCO with a divided output, or running really slow. | Thanks for your input
However, I'd say a dual utility LFO with two vactrol-ish things attached is a MUCH MUCH MUCH easier build than building two VCOs
- again, I'm not looking for precision, 1v/oct, ANY sort of proper tracking, really - not even temporal precision with varying cv input - think more wogglebug, less proper control
*IF* that fails I'd love some pointers on how to do a stripped build of your VCO - that would certainly come in handy. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
andrewF
Joined: Dec 29, 2006 Posts: 1176 Location: australia
Audio files: 4
|
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 4:38 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
wetterberg wrote: |
*IF* that fails I'd love some pointers on how to do a stripped build of your VCO - that would certainly come in handy. |
That would be Richard Brewster's version -
http://pugix.com/synth/cgs-vco-project/ |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
wetterberg
Joined: Jun 27, 2008 Posts: 48 Location: denmark
|
Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:12 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
andrewF wrote: | wetterberg wrote: |
*IF* that fails I'd love some pointers on how to do a stripped build of your VCO - that would certainly come in handy. |
That would be Richard Brewster's version -
http://pugix.com/synth/cgs-vco-project/ |
cheers. hmmm. I've been over there before... I wish there were a less techy approach, though. CGS-as-seen-from-the-noob, as it were. I guess that'll have to be me |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
bugbrand
Joined: Nov 27, 2005 Posts: 846 Location: Bristol, UK
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 1
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
zthee
Joined: Feb 20, 2008 Posts: 414 Location: Stockholm
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
ericcoleridge
Joined: Jan 16, 2007 Posts: 889 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 6:31 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
For me, I would have more use with a sync/reset input on the utility LFOs; I'm wondering if there would be a 'simple' way to implement sync? I know that I've accomplished a reasonable reset on my MFOS LFO by just inserting a gate signal at the timing capacitor.
Of course there's tons of LFOs out there that are designed with sync, VC, etc. But, I particularly like these Utility LFOs, for a number of reasons. They remind me of the LFOs on the MS20. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
wetterberg
Joined: Jun 27, 2008 Posts: 48 Location: denmark
|
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2009 2:42 am Post subject:
|
|
|
ericcoleridge wrote: | For me, I would have more use with a sync/reset input on the utility LFOs; I'm wondering if there would be a 'simple' way to implement sync? I know that I've accomplished a reasonable reset on my MFOS LFO by just inserting a gate signal at the timing capacitor.
Of course there's tons of LFOs out there that are designed with sync, VC, etc. But, I particularly like these Utility LFOs, for a number of reasons. They remind me of the LFOs on the MS20. | I did read a description about how to do a reset with the Utility LFOs - I believe it's on this forum, too? |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|