electro-music.com   Dedicated to experimental electro-acoustic
and electronic music
 
    Front Page  |  Radio
 |  Media  |  Forum  |  Wiki  |  Links
Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
 FAQFAQ   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   LinksLinks
 RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in  Chat RoomChat Room 
go to the radio page Live at electro-music.com radio 1 Please visit the chat
  host / artist show at your time
today> Sorry, no program tonight. Chez Mosc
 Forum index » DIY Hardware and Software
need to duplicate this side-effect of a DVM in a circuit!
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: jksuperstar, Scott Stites, Uncle Krunkus
Page 1 of 1 [13 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
rjd2



Joined: Sep 02, 2007
Posts: 236
Location: philly

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 7:54 pm    Post subject: need to duplicate this side-effect of a DVM in a circuit!
Subject description: buffer IC in a Yamaha CS-5 is shot and things are kooky.
Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

hi guys, i need some help on how to accomplish something....

short story: Yamaha CS-5 restoration, IC3(a buffer IC) was shot, replaced with a 741 opamp that shares the same pinout. the problem i now have is that with portamento at 0, the keyboard scales properly, and the keyboard voltage output works perfect. but as you turn up portamento to 10, it adds the portamento affect, but IC 3 pulls the keyboard voltage down a considerable amount. it also throws the scaling out. this only happens south of the portamento pot, so im sure that the new IC is the culprit.

here where it gets wierd.

if i measure the V of pin 1 of IC3, with the negative lead of the DVM to ground and positive lead on pin 1, it FIXES THE PROBLEM! the portamento pot has virtually no affect on the overall keyboard voltage. i've never seen a DVM actually affect the behavior of a circuit, but im obviously showing my ass here.


so, what do i do? thanks for the help!


Screen shot 2010-04-20 at 10.45.02 PM.png
 Description:
 Filesize:  286.38 KB
 Viewed:  160 Time(s)
This image has been reduced to fit the page. Click on it to enlarge.

Screen shot 2010-04-20 at 10.45.02 PM.png


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
richardc64



Joined: Jun 01, 2006
Posts: 679
Location: NYC
Audio files: 26

PostPosted: Tue Apr 20, 2010 11:28 pm    Post subject: Re: need to duplicate this side-effect of a DVM in a circuit!
Subject description: buffer IC in a Yamaha CS-5 is shot and things are kooky.
Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

rjd2 wrote:
...as you turn up portamento to 10, it adds the portamento affect, but IC 3 pulls the keyboard voltage down a considerable amount. it also throws the scaling out. this only happens south of the portamento pot, so im sure that the new IC is the culprit.


Surely, Yamaha did not use a 741 there. It should be something with a higher impedance input, such as a TLO81, LF351 or other FET input op amp.

Quote:
if i measure the V of pin 1 of IC3, with the negative lead of the DVM to ground and positive lead on pin 1, it FIXES THE PROBLEM! the portamento pot has virtually no affect on the overall keyboard voltage. i've never seen a DVM actually affect the behavior of a circuit, but im obviously showing my ass here.


A high-value resistor -- like 10Meg -- from pin 1 to ground should duplicate the loading effect of the DVM. But since you say the DVM "fix" has virtually no effect on the keyboard voltage, that op amp really should be replaced with something better.

_________________
Revenge is a dish best served with a fork... to the eye
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
rjd2



Joined: Sep 02, 2007
Posts: 236
Location: philly

PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 5:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

thanks, richardcs64!

yes, you are exactly right; Yamaha had a TA7505M in there originally. unfortunately, i can't find this IC anywhere, or even a datasheet.

any ideas what would be more suitable there, than the 741 i have now? thanks!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blue hell
Site Admin


Joined: Apr 03, 2004
Posts: 24423
Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 297
G2 patch files: 320

PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 9:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Cant you trim the unwanted effect away with VR1? As pin1 and pin 5 are for offset control I'd think that would be the purpose of VR1.
_________________
Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
Posted Image, might have been reduced in size. Click Image to view fullscreen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
rjd2



Joined: Sep 02, 2007
Posts: 236
Location: philly

PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 9:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

bluehell-looking at the schem, thats exactly what i first thought, cause its the null offset on the 741 schem. alas, no. it provides a very slight correction in voltage/pitch, but does not change the "bad" effect(which is quite huge; portamento up to 10 will cause C1 to drop more than an octave!)

FWIW, i have tried the same thing and gotten the same results on a ca3140e, which of course shares the same pinout.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blue hell
Site Admin


Joined: Apr 03, 2004
Posts: 24423
Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 297
G2 patch files: 320

PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 10:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Crying or Very sad odd ... 3140 definitely has high impedance inputs, so thats not the issue. Is the capacitor leaky? (the .22 one).
_________________
Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
Posted Image, might have been reduced in size. Click Image to view fullscreen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
rjd2



Joined: Sep 02, 2007
Posts: 236
Location: philly

PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 11:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

nope, cap is fine. looks fine, just tried a .22uf film in there, no difference.....

dunno if this helps, but if i gently blow on the IC3, the drop in voltage gets worse. so the hotter the actual IC, the less drastic the problem.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
richardc64



Joined: Jun 01, 2006
Posts: 679
Location: NYC
Audio files: 26

PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

rjd2 wrote:
any ideas what would be more suitable there, than the 741 i have now? thanks!


Hmmm...I already suggested two. LF411 also looks suitable.

http://www.futurlec.com/Linear/LF411CN.shtml

_________________
Revenge is a dish best served with a fork... to the eye
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
rjd2



Joined: Sep 02, 2007
Posts: 236
Location: philly

PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

my goodness, you are right! sorry, richardc64. crossing fingers....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rjd2



Joined: Sep 02, 2007
Posts: 236
Location: philly

PostPosted: Wed Apr 21, 2010 4:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

thanks for the help, guys. so an NTE7144 worked, but still, didnt solve the problem. swapping the 10k compensating trimmer worked!!! i noticed it would jump from "low to hi" at a point in its throw. all solved, calibrate and im good. thanks!!!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
blue hell
Site Admin


Joined: Apr 03, 2004
Posts: 24423
Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 297
G2 patch files: 320

PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 11:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

End good all good, glad you solved it.
_________________
Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
Posted Image, might have been reduced in size. Click Image to view fullscreen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
rjd2



Joined: Sep 02, 2007
Posts: 236
Location: philly

PostPosted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 11:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

well alas, it was NOT a 100% solution, unfortunately. following up here in the off-chance that someone would understand WHY this would be the case(i.e. is the elusive TA7505m an IC with some magical properties?)

the 10k trimmer, V1, can be set to a value that will provide portamento, and NO voltage offset. in other words, activating the portamento circuit will leave the keyboard voltage unchanged. i did this, and thought i had solved the problem. however, upon going to calibrate the synth, i found that V1 is also the only trimmer to set the keyboard SCALING!!! so i was left with a choice-properly working portamento circuit and atonal scaling, or proper 12-tone scaling, and a worthless portamento circuit.

of course, i chose proper scaling, bail on the portamento function, and re-assembled cause i was tired of the project.

but obviously, yamaha designed this to work in the first place. however, i dont understand how, unless the original TA7505m chip had a property that either an nte7144, ca3140, or 741 IC doesnt have. i quadruple checked all my soldering, no bleeding pins or poor connections, and i also checked upstream and downstream of the portamento circuit, and nothing at all. eh, cest la vie!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
madmaverick



Joined: Jun 15, 2024
Posts: 1
Location: Prague / CZ

PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2024 2:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Greetings all,
this is a very old thread, but here am I.. And this might be useful for anyone searching for help. (I was recently fixing CS-15D with failed buffer IC)

µA741 (LM741 etc..) or NE5534 is the correct replacement. The trimmer there is to make sure that S&H/buffer circuit isnt creating any unwanted offset. Actual scaling is already comming from key assigner and should be perfect (if not, you have a bigger problem..) and any additional calibration is done on VCO side of things.
Probe pin 39 of key assigner to check voltages. Reading has to be from 0.25V to 2V (low C - high C), check if you are getting same values after first buffer, then check that it also corresponds after opamp on TP17 (KVO), if not - use VR1 to balance it. Keep in mind that problem might be even in that trimpot (they are very old at this point Smile ).
After that all is just matter of VCO calibration VR2,3,4. (all VR numbers are relative to mentioned CS-5)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: jksuperstar, Scott Stites, Uncle Krunkus
Page 1 of 1 [13 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
 Forum index » DIY Hardware and Software
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Copyright © 2003 through 2009 by electro-music.com - Conditions Of Use