| Author |
Message |
GovernorSilver

Joined: Apr 26, 2004 Posts: 1349 Location: Washington DC Metro
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:21 am Post subject:
New Moog all analog keyboard, Moog Guitar updated |
 |
|
Posted by Craig Anderton to Harmony Central's MusikMesse2009 forum:
| Quote: | Andre from Moog Music was sitting in front of me on the plane, and he had the Moog guitar with him. Apparently it's been updated and he'll be playing it at the booth. They also have a new Moog keyboard that's all analog - nothing digital at all - not even presets for memory."
|
Craig is a smart guy who is aware of just about every product in the music gear business. I'm pretty sure he's not talking about Voyager Old School. _________________ Current and recent work on Soundcloud
Some old stuff on VIRB |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ark

Joined: Mar 06, 2008 Posts: 679 Location: New Jersey
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 31
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:45 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Sigh. I just wish they would redesign the Voyager to have endless rotary encoders plus lighted indicators, along the lines of the Nord Lead 3, the Akai APC40 controller, or the Korg R3. The Little Phatty didn't even get it right, because its knobs aren't endless.
A Voyager with indicators that instantly showed the entire contents of each patch would be almost unbearably tempting even though I already have a Yamaha VL-70m and so don't really want another monosynth  |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
GovernorSilver

Joined: Apr 26, 2004 Posts: 1349 Location: Washington DC Metro
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:03 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| ark wrote: | | Sigh. I just wish they would redesign the Voyager to have endless rotary encoders plus lighted indicators, |
Did the Minimoog have endless encoders? Just asking because I never had one. _________________ Current and recent work on Soundcloud
Some old stuff on VIRB |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BobTheDog

Joined: Feb 28, 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:31 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
No, but it couldn't save state.
If a synths state is always defined by its knob positions then endless encoders are useless, but if a synth has the idea of loading saved state then they are very useful. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ark

Joined: Mar 06, 2008 Posts: 679 Location: New Jersey
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 31
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:34 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Indeed. I've only heard of one synth that uses endless encoders plus lights to indicate the values of all of its parameters, and that's the Nord Lead 3. The G2 uses the same technique, but only shows eight parameters at a time.
It's interesting that both of these synths are by Nord and they're both discontinued. And I think it's amazing that no one has stepped up to fill this particular gap. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BobTheDog

Joined: Feb 28, 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:58 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| There is a TV program in the uK called "The Gadget Show" http://gadgetshow.five.tv/gadget-show at the back of the set are some shelves containing iconic gadgets of our times, the Nord Lead 3 is there! |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Mohoyoho

Joined: Dec 03, 2003 Posts: 1632 Location: Tennessee
Audio files: 8
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:41 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I perform frequently on my Voyager, and I really don't have a problem with the pots not being endless encoders. I tweak the pots frequently when I perform. When I first got my Voyager the pots were annoying when going from one preset state to another, but I quickly adjusted to it. I actually like the way my Phatty's encoders work, and I think it is the best of both worlds.
I have a Waldorf Q, and it has the endless encoders. They are very convenient. What bugs me, however, is any change to that preset is held when one goes to different preset. There is a "e" that reminds me that a change was made, and it can be brought back to the original setting by hitting "recall." I wish it was like the Voyager; the changes disappear when one goes to another preset. However, like the Voyager's foibles, I have learned to work around it. _________________ Mark Mahoney
Kingsport, Tennessee
http://www.reverbnation.com/markmahoney
www.cdbaby.com/cd/markmahoney
www.cdbaby.com/cd/mmahoneympeck
http://cdbaby.com/cd/mmahoneympeck2
http://www.limitedwave.com/subterraneous/ |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ark

Joined: Mar 06, 2008 Posts: 679 Location: New Jersey
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 31
|
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:55 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Mohoyoho wrote: | | I perform frequently on my Voyager, and I really don't have a problem with the pots not being endless encoders. I tweak the pots frequently when I perform. When I first got my Voyager the pots were annoying when going from one preset state to another, but I quickly adjusted to it. I actually like the way my Phatty's encoders work, and I think it is the best of both worlds. |
Indeed. On the Voyager, I don't see how you can understand what a patch is dong without look at every setting individually.
Why do you like the way that the Phatty's encoders work as opposed to the way the G2's encoders work? It seems to me that in order to change a parameter value on a Phatty, you have to turn the knob to the point that corresponds to the parameter's current value.
| Mohoyoho wrote: | | I have a Waldorf Q, and it has the endless encoders. They are very convenient. What bugs me, however, is any change to that preset is held when one goes to different preset. There is a "e" that reminds me that a change was made, and it can be brought back to the original setting by hitting "recall." I wish it was like the Voyager; the changes disappear when one goes to another preset. However, like the Voyager's foibles, I have learned to work around it. |
Does the Q have visual indicators corresponding to the encoders, or do you have to look at a separate display to find out a parameter's current value? |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
GovernorSilver

Joined: Apr 26, 2004 Posts: 1349 Location: Washington DC Metro
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 7:59 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| ark wrote: | | Mohoyoho wrote: | | I perform frequently on my Voyager, and I really don't have a problem with the pots not being endless encoders. I tweak the pots frequently when I perform. When I first got my Voyager the pots were annoying when going from one preset state to another, but I quickly adjusted to it. I actually like the way my Phatty's encoders work, and I think it is the best of both worlds. |
Indeed. On the Voyager, I don't see how you can understand what a patch is dong without look at every setting individually.
|
The knobs are pretty huge in person compared to the knobs on my Nord G2X and Korg M3. I was surprised how big they turned out to be after I received my Voyager. The labels are bigger too.
Endless encoders would sound like a useful enhancement though. _________________ Current and recent work on Soundcloud
Some old stuff on VIRB |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ark

Joined: Mar 06, 2008 Posts: 679 Location: New Jersey
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 31
|
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 8:07 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| GovernorSilver wrote: | The knobs are pretty huge in person compared to the knobs on my Nord G2X and Korg M3. I was surprised how big they turned out to be after I received my Voyager. The labels are bigger too.
|
The problem is that if you load a preset, the physical positions of the knobs no longer match the values of the corresponding parameters. So it doesn't matter how big the knobs and labels are, because looking at the knobs gives you no useful information. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
GovernorSilver

Joined: Apr 26, 2004 Posts: 1349 Location: Washington DC Metro
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 8:17 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| ark wrote: | | GovernorSilver wrote: | The knobs are pretty huge in person compared to the knobs on my Nord G2X and Korg M3. I was surprised how big they turned out to be after I received my Voyager. The labels are bigger too.
|
The problem is that if you load a preset, the physical positions of the knobs no longer match the values of the corresponding parameters. So it doesn't matter how big the knobs and labels are, because looking at the knobs gives you no useful information. |
I play the same couple of patches on the Voyager over and over, so I don't need to glance at every single knob every time I load a familiar patch.
I do get your point about endless encoders on your Voyager, however, as I posted before. _________________ Current and recent work on Soundcloud
Some old stuff on VIRB |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Mohoyoho

Joined: Dec 03, 2003 Posts: 1632 Location: Tennessee
Audio files: 8
|
Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:05 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
In performance I usually know what the settings of certain parameters are, so when I switch a patch I just move the knobs to there approx settings before I play. Takes about one second per knob. The LCD displays what the patch setting should be and what it currently is at. It's very simple to make adjustments on the fly, but it will never be as nice as the encoders.
I don't know if this makes a difference or not, but many analogue purists tout how true analogue pots contibute to a better sound. I wouldn't know if that is true or not.
I have not tried a G2, and no, the Q doesn't have lit encoders. _________________ Mark Mahoney
Kingsport, Tennessee
http://www.reverbnation.com/markmahoney
www.cdbaby.com/cd/markmahoney
www.cdbaby.com/cd/mmahoneympeck
http://cdbaby.com/cd/mmahoneympeck2
http://www.limitedwave.com/subterraneous/ |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|