Author |
Message |
nescivi

Joined: Mar 23, 2005 Posts: 94 Location: Montreal
|
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 2:57 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Futurist music:
there is a cd with some futurist recordings:
The cd is called Musica Futurista, the art of noises
Label: Salon LTMCD 2401
made in England.
I found it in the shop of the Centre Pompidou in Paris.
It contains original recordings of speeches and performances, as well as reconstructed pieces.
also more info on:
www.futurism.org.uk/ |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 3:05 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
THX! A great link! Awesome! _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
seraph
Editor


Joined: Jun 21, 2003 Posts: 12398 Location: Firenze, Italy
Audio files: 33
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2005 1:21 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I added that link to the Links page (it has my approval )
check also this old thread _________________ homepage - blog - forum - youtube
Quote: | Don't die with your music still in you - Wayne Dyer |
Last edited by seraph on Wed Nov 29, 2006 11:57 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
gravehill
Joined: Apr 12, 2005 Posts: 49 Location: Berlin, Germany
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 8:24 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
A bit late, perhaps, but here's my two cents to the discussion.
Firstly, since there was a lot of talk about futurism and dadaism, I would like to suggest you to check out www.ubu.com . It's an online archive dedicated to (mainly) dadaism and futurism. There's also plenty of other stuff, not just music. But plenty of free and legal mp3s, too.
As for the concept of noise, I tend to define noise in purely technical terms (white noise, pink, red , whatever...). I understand the point about ethnic and alternative tuning systems being hard to grasp to those who are not used to the particular tuning system. But that's something I wouldn't define as anything to do with noise. It just tends to sound somehow "out of tune" at first, until we get used to the tuning system used.
With my own music, I definitely see that in the future I'm going to explore all kinds of alternative tuning systems much more than in the past. I think there's a HUGE potential for a composer in ethnic/historical/artificial tuning systems and the best thing is that with computers it's as easy to do as just loading an appropriate Scala tuning file and using it. _________________ For mind-boggling experimental music:
http://www.chaosresearch.de |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18240 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 224
G2 patch files: 60
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Ponk

Joined: Nov 17, 2004 Posts: 262 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 9:26 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
No one has mentioned artists like Masami Akita (aka Merzbow), Russell Haswell or Whitehouse, who make noise that doesn't claim to be anything but noise. Or something like that, I'm not an expert. Anyway, I think their aim is to make music as extreme as possible. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18240 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 224
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 9:38 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Merzbow has been mentioned on the forum a few times, but not in this discussion. Use the forum's search capability. I like his music, but I haven't heard all that much of it. _________________ --Howard
my music and other stuff |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Ponk

Joined: Nov 17, 2004 Posts: 262 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 9:41 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Yep, surely he's been mentioned, I just thought that a discussion with the topic "Noise, tonality and whatever" has to include his name.  |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
gravehill
Joined: Apr 12, 2005 Posts: 49 Location: Berlin, Germany
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 10:48 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hypnotique seems very interesting, indeed. And I think Merzbow just recently(?) released a 50-cd box of old material, if my information is correct.
What I'm looking forward to try tonight is to make experiments with Bach's "newly found" tempered tuning system. Has anyone of you tried it out yet? _________________ For mind-boggling experimental music:
http://www.chaosresearch.de |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18240 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 224
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 10:51 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
gravehill wrote: | What I'm looking forward to try tonight is to make experiments with Bach's "newly found" tempered tuning system. Has anyone of you tried it out yet? |
I'm not familiar with this. Please elaborate. _________________ --Howard
my music and other stuff |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
gravehill
Joined: Apr 12, 2005 Posts: 49 Location: Berlin, Germany
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18240 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 224
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 1:48 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Thanks for the links. Very intense. I would like to hear some music using this temperment. _________________ --Howard
my music and other stuff |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Ponk

Joined: Nov 17, 2004 Posts: 262 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 1:52 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
gravehill wrote: | And I think Merzbow just recently(?) released a 50-cd box of old material, if my information is correct. |
Indeed, he did, Merzbox. It was in 2000, I think. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
gravehill
Joined: Apr 12, 2005 Posts: 49 Location: Berlin, Germany
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 4:49 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
mosc wrote: | I would like to hear some music using this temperment. |
Under construction...  _________________ For mind-boggling experimental music:
http://www.chaosresearch.de |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
zynthetix
Joined: Jun 12, 2003 Posts: 838 Location: nyc
Audio files: 10
G2 patch files: 13
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 7:19 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Links to the Scala software site and a free VST interpreter for scala files are located in this thread |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
flowersniffer7
Joined: Nov 17, 2006 Posts: 53 Location: Allentown PA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 7:34 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I think the negative connotation of the word noise is a completely affected implication... In any definition I have ever read of noise, nowhere does it necessarily describe unpleasant sound or dissonance. Noise is simple an all encompassing word... Much like the word sound... We can put a negative connotation on that as well... as far as: what is unpleasant noise? That is completely subjective. So I guess we can go on and on with semantics, but as Merzbow said, to paraphrase, "if noise is defined as unpleasant sound than pop music is noise to me." _________________ analoguemind.zy8.org |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Antimon
Joined: Jan 18, 2005 Posts: 4145 Location: Sweden
Audio files: 371
G2 patch files: 100
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:44 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
www.m-w.com on "noise":
"2 a : SOUND; especially : one that lacks agreeable musical quality or is noticeably unpleasant b : any sound that is undesired or interferes with one's hearing of something c : an unwanted signal or a disturbance (as static or a variation of voltage) in an electronic device or instrument (as radio or television); broadly : a disturbance interfering with the operation of a usually mechanical device or system d : electromagnetic radiation (as light or radio waves) that is composed of several frequencies and that involves random changes in frequency or amplitude e : irrelevant or meaningless data or output occurring along with desired information
(...)
6 : a style of rock music that is loud, often discordant, and usually uses electronic noise (as feedback)"
/Stefan _________________ Antimon's Window
@soundcloud @Flattr home - you can't explain music |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
flowersniffer7
Joined: Nov 17, 2006 Posts: 53 Location: Allentown PA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 9:27 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Antimon wrote: | www.m-w.com on "noise":
"2 a : SOUND; especially : one that lacks agreeable musical quality or is noticeably unpleasant b : any sound that is undesired or interferes with one's hearing of something c : an unwanted signal or a disturbance (as static or a variation of voltage) in an electronic device or instrument (as radio or television); broadly : a disturbance interfering with the operation of a usually mechanical device or system d : electromagnetic radiation (as light or radio waves) that is composed of several frequencies and that involves random changes in frequency or amplitude e : irrelevant or meaningless data or output occurring along with desired information
(...)
6 : a style of rock music that is loud, often discordant, and usually uses electronic noise (as feedback)"
/Stefan |
As with every time this "arguement comes up, somebody wants to bring up semantics... As I said earlier it is useless to do so, because you pulled 2 of 6 definitions of noise off of merium webster... Lets take a look at all of them:
1 : loud, confused, or senseless shouting or outcry
2 a : SOUND; especially : one that lacks agreeable musical quality or is noticeably unpleasant b : any sound that is undesired or interferes with one's hearing of something c : an unwanted signal or a disturbance (as static or a variation of voltage) in an electronic device or instrument (as radio or television); broadly : a disturbance interfering with the operation of a usually mechanical device or system d : electromagnetic radiation (as light or radio waves) that is composed of several frequencies and that involves random changes in frequency or amplitude e : irrelevant or meaningless data or output occurring along with desired information
3 : common talk : RUMOR; especially : SLANDER
4 : something that attracts attention <the>
5 : something spoken or uttered
6 : a style of rock music that is loud, often discordant, and usually uses electronic noise (as feedback)
In all, I'd say this is pretty broad, and the only definitions that suggest any negative connotation are directly reffering to either the specific genre of music or a scientific anomoly... Noise can also be as stated above: "a disturbance interfering with the operation of a usually mechanical device or system ."
However lets use some common sense here and sort through what applies to sound specifically.
"something that attracts attention."
pretty broad, not negative or positive.
"an unwanted signal or a disturbance (as static or a variation of voltage) in an electronic device or instrument (as radio or television)."
this is obviously not referencing sound.
1. sound, esp. of a loud, harsh, or confused kind: deafening noises.
2. a sound of any kind: to hear a noise at the door.
3. loud shouting, outcry, or clamor.
4. a nonharmonious or discordant group of sounds.
5. an electric disturbance in a communications system that interferes with or prevents reception of a signal or of information, as the buzz on a telephone or snow on a television screen.
6. Informal. extraneous, irrelevant, or meaningless facts, information, statistics, etc.: The noise in the report obscured its useful information.
7. Obsolete. rumor or gossip, esp. slander.
We can go on and on here... yet it is obvious to see which definitions are directly influenced by the modern connotation on noise and which ones are broad and have more application... such as: 2. a sound of any kind: to hear a noise at the door.
A noise simply defined can be any audible sound. The negative connotation as I said before has been completely and 100% affected.
The point I was trying to make, remains the same... The semantics remain subjective... _________________ analoguemind.zy8.org |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Antimon
Joined: Jan 18, 2005 Posts: 4145 Location: Sweden
Audio files: 371
G2 patch files: 100
|
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 2:17 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
flowersniffer7 wrote: |
As with every time this "arguement comes up, somebody wants to bring up semantics... |
Sorry about that I think languages are fun, and since you wrote
Quote: | In any definition I have ever read of noise, nowhere does it necessarily describe unpleasant sound or dissonance |
I thought it would be interesting to see what a dictionary has to say about the definition. I cut out the paragraphs that seemed to be about sound - the others were about talking or machinery or stuff. I think the meaning of the numbered paragraphs is that it will be obvious in a sentence if the word "noise" corresponds to 1, 2, 3 etc. We're talking about 2, I guess, but sometimes miscommunication is caused by confusing various meanings of a word with each other.
I'm a bit out of my depth, since english isn't my natural language, but at the same time it's a bit enlightening when you try to translate and realize that it works differently in other languages. Especially, translating "noise" to my own language results in very different words depending on whether you mean an unpleasant noise, white noise, background noise etc.
Subjective is fine when it comes to what kind of music you enjoy, or even what you consider to be music, but I think a word like "noise" should be able to have a well-defined meaning (within a context). After that you can start to argue wether it is good or bad in different situations.
/Stefan _________________ Antimon's Window
@soundcloud @Flattr home - you can't explain music |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
flowersniffer7
Joined: Nov 17, 2006 Posts: 53 Location: Allentown PA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 4:24 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Antimon wrote: | flowersniffer7 wrote: |
As with every time this "arguement comes up, somebody wants to bring up semantics... |
Sorry about that I think languages are fun, and since you wrote
Quote: | In any definition I have ever read of noise, nowhere does it necessarily describe unpleasant sound or dissonance |
I thought it would be interesting to see what a dictionary has to say about the definition. I cut out the paragraphs that seemed to be about sound - the others were about talking or machinery or stuff. I think the meaning of the numbered paragraphs is that it will be obvious in a sentence if the word "noise" corresponds to 1, 2, 3 etc. We're talking about 2, I guess, but sometimes miscommunication is caused by confusing various meanings of a word with each other.
I'm a bit out of my depth, since english isn't my natural language, but at the same time it's a bit enlightening when you try to translate and realize that it works differently in other languages. Especially, translating "noise" to my own language results in very different words depending on whether you mean an unpleasant noise, white noise, background noise etc.
Subjective is fine when it comes to what kind of music you enjoy, or even what you consider to be music, but I think a word like "noise" should be able to have a well-defined meaning (within a context). After that you can start to argue wether it is good or bad in different situations.
/Stefan |
I did write that, and it wasn't necessarily meant in any dictionary context... If I wanted to go into actual definitions I would have pulled one, however that wasn't what I was implying... I was suggesting that as with the second definition on wikipedia... Noise has been a word that has existed in many languages and applies to "any sound."
The negative connotation has only developed with 20th century definitions unless you want to go so far as to say that the word noise is translated from the latin word that had a second meaning, "nausea." However, As you can see looking into the history of the word on wikipedia and I ams sure you can find more in depth discussions on the linguistics elsewhere, it has been used for centuries in english to describe... "any sound," without regard to any negative or positive connotation.
So in regards to what I said... You'll have to excuse the way I worded it, but I think everybody understands fully what I meant. Hence my comment on semantics. We could go on for days about the linguistic meaning of the word... or we could discuss more realistically the actual connotation of the word... The negative of which is only really a percieved negative not by any means an implicit negative, or in my opinion an express negative either.
I make noise and as much as I don't like to label things... I don't really find that describing it as noise should give any open minded listener any negative preconceptions... It will just allow those who enjoy the "genre," to explore similar sounds without having to deal with the crap they don't want to search through...
albeit there is plenty of crap in any genre, but it limits your search to categorize, and I think that is the only legitimate purpose of labelling anything noise. _________________ analoguemind.zy8.org |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18240 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 224
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 7:23 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
It is interesting that words that have multiple definitions are not always consistent. If noise is the name of a style of music, then it is just a name, like hip hop - there is nothing hip about hip hop; at least as I understand the connotations for the word hip, as in hippy. Music that is categorized as being in the style noise can be downright beautiful and very pleasant. These genre names can be useful, like you say, but they are also very imprecise and sometimes inappropriate.
Another interesting word is bad, which sometimes means good. Another interesting one these days is the word nigga, which can be a friendly jibe or a racist insult depending on the perceived racial characteristics of the speaker. _________________ --Howard
my music and other stuff |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
flowersniffer7
Joined: Nov 17, 2006 Posts: 53 Location: Allentown PA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 8:20 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
mosc wrote: | It is interesting that words that have multiple definitions are not always consistent. If noise is the name of a style of music, then it is just a name, like hip hop - there is nothing hip about hip hop; at least as I understand the connotations for the word hip, as in hippy. Music that is categorized as being in the style noise can be downright beautiful and very pleasant. These genre names can be useful, like you say, but they are also very imprecise and sometimes inappropriate.
Another interesting word is bad, which sometimes means good. Another interesting one these days is the word nigga, which can be a friendly jibe or a racist insult depending on the perceived racial characteristics of the speaker. |
quite right... Its all about the perception and those who are open minded enough don't use such words to base their judgement on, they listen and say I like, or I dislike and thats it... _________________ analoguemind.zy8.org |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bachus

Joined: Feb 29, 2004 Posts: 2922 Location: Up in that tree over there.
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 7:34 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
flowersniffer7 wrote: | ... Its all about the perception and those who are open minded enough don't use such words to base their judgement on, they listen and say I like, or I dislike and thats it... |
If one is both open minded enough and has some self awareness one might add descriptive (not judgmental explanations) e.g. "I did not like it because there are a lot of bagpipes used in the piece and I dislike bagpipes." _________________ The question is not whether they can talk or reason, but whether they can suffer. -- Jeremy Bentham |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
seraph
Editor


Joined: Jun 21, 2003 Posts: 12398 Location: Firenze, Italy
Audio files: 33
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 8:30 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
well...if you are too open-minded your brains will fall out
 _________________ homepage - blog - forum - youtube
Quote: | Don't die with your music still in you - Wayne Dyer |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 8:35 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
seraph wrote: | well...if you are too open-minded your brains will fall out
 |
Are you completely sure you are not a viking?  _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|