electro-music.com   Dedicated to experimental electro-acoustic
and electronic music
 
    Front Page  |  Radio
 |  Media  |  Forum  |  Wiki  |  Links
Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
 FAQFAQ   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   LinksLinks
 RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in  Chat RoomChat Room 
 Forum index » Discussion » Composition
Noise, tonality and whatever?
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: elektro80
Page 2 of 3 [74 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3 Next
Author Message
nescivi



Joined: Mar 23, 2005
Posts: 94
Location: Montreal

PostPosted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 2:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Futurist music:

there is a cd with some futurist recordings:

The cd is called Musica Futurista, the art of noises
Label: Salon LTMCD 2401
made in England.

I found it in the shop of the Centre Pompidou in Paris.

It contains original recordings of speeches and performances, as well as reconstructed pieces.

also more info on:
www.futurism.org.uk/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
elektro80
Site Admin


Joined: Mar 25, 2003
Posts: 21959
Location: Norway
Audio files: 14

PostPosted: Mon Mar 28, 2005 3:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

THX! A great link! Awesome!
_________________
A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"

MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
seraph
Editor
Editor


Joined: Jun 21, 2003
Posts: 12398
Location: Firenze, Italy
Audio files: 33
G2 patch files: 2

PostPosted: Tue Mar 29, 2005 1:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

I added that link to the Links page (it has my approval Very Happy )
check also this old thread

_________________
homepage - blog - forum - youtube

Quote:
Don't die with your music still in you - Wayne Dyer

Last edited by seraph on Wed Nov 29, 2006 11:57 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
gravehill



Joined: Apr 12, 2005
Posts: 49
Location: Berlin, Germany

PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 8:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

A bit late, perhaps, but here's my two cents to the discussion.

Firstly, since there was a lot of talk about futurism and dadaism, I would like to suggest you to check out www.ubu.com . It's an online archive dedicated to (mainly) dadaism and futurism. There's also plenty of other stuff, not just music. But plenty of free and legal mp3s, too.

As for the concept of noise, I tend to define noise in purely technical terms (white noise, pink, red , whatever...). I understand the point about ethnic and alternative tuning systems being hard to grasp to those who are not used to the particular tuning system. But that's something I wouldn't define as anything to do with noise. It just tends to sound somehow "out of tune" at first, until we get used to the tuning system used.

With my own music, I definitely see that in the future I'm going to explore all kinds of alternative tuning systems much more than in the past. I think there's a HUGE potential for a composer in ethnic/historical/artificial tuning systems and the best thing is that with computers it's as easy to do as just loading an appropriate Scala tuning file and using it.

_________________
For mind-boggling experimental music:

http://www.chaosresearch.de
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mosc
Site Admin


Joined: Jan 31, 2003
Posts: 18240
Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 224
G2 patch files: 60

PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 8:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Yes, I'd like to think we are into a new era for alternative tunings. Don't know if you read my review of Hypnotique, but she's into this quite a bit, http://electro-music.com/forum/topic-5985.html
_________________
--Howard
my music and other stuff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Ponk



Joined: Nov 17, 2004
Posts: 262
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Audio files: 1

PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 9:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

No one has mentioned artists like Masami Akita (aka Merzbow), Russell Haswell or Whitehouse, who make noise that doesn't claim to be anything but noise. Or something like that, I'm not an expert. Anyway, I think their aim is to make music as extreme as possible.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mosc
Site Admin


Joined: Jan 31, 2003
Posts: 18240
Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 224
G2 patch files: 60

PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 9:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Merzbow has been mentioned on the forum a few times, but not in this discussion. Use the forum's search capability. I like his music, but I haven't heard all that much of it.
_________________
--Howard
my music and other stuff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Ponk



Joined: Nov 17, 2004
Posts: 262
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Audio files: 1

PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 9:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Yep, surely he's been mentioned, I just thought that a discussion with the topic "Noise, tonality and whatever" has to include his name. Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gravehill



Joined: Apr 12, 2005
Posts: 49
Location: Berlin, Germany

PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 10:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Hypnotique seems very interesting, indeed. And I think Merzbow just recently(?) released a 50-cd box of old material, if my information is correct.

What I'm looking forward to try tonight is to make experiments with Bach's "newly found" tempered tuning system. Has anyone of you tried it out yet?

_________________
For mind-boggling experimental music:

http://www.chaosresearch.de
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mosc
Site Admin


Joined: Jan 31, 2003
Posts: 18240
Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 224
G2 patch files: 60

PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 10:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

gravehill wrote:
What I'm looking forward to try tonight is to make experiments with Bach's "newly found" tempered tuning system. Has anyone of you tried it out yet?

I'm not familiar with this. Please elaborate.

_________________
--Howard
my music and other stuff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
gravehill



Joined: Apr 12, 2005
Posts: 49
Location: Berlin, Germany

PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 12:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Check out www.larips.com. Very interesting.

In http://www.bestii.com/~mschulter/Lehman_Bach_Neidhardt.txt there's a lengthy explanation along with how to make a Scala file out of it.

_________________
For mind-boggling experimental music:

http://www.chaosresearch.de
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
mosc
Site Admin


Joined: Jan 31, 2003
Posts: 18240
Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 224
G2 patch files: 60

PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 1:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Thanks for the links. Very intense. I would like to hear some music using this temperment.
_________________
--Howard
my music and other stuff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Ponk



Joined: Nov 17, 2004
Posts: 262
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Audio files: 1

PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 1:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

gravehill wrote:
And I think Merzbow just recently(?) released a 50-cd box of old material, if my information is correct.


Indeed, he did, Merzbox. It was in 2000, I think.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gravehill



Joined: Apr 12, 2005
Posts: 49
Location: Berlin, Germany

PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 4:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

mosc wrote:
I would like to hear some music using this temperment.


Under construction... Cool

_________________
For mind-boggling experimental music:

http://www.chaosresearch.de
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
zynthetix



Joined: Jun 12, 2003
Posts: 838
Location: nyc
Audio files: 10
G2 patch files: 13

PostPosted: Wed Apr 13, 2005 7:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Links to the Scala software site and a free VST interpreter for scala files are located in this thread
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
flowersniffer7



Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Posts: 53
Location: Allentown PA

PostPosted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 7:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

I think the negative connotation of the word noise is a completely affected implication... In any definition I have ever read of noise, nowhere does it necessarily describe unpleasant sound or dissonance. Noise is simple an all encompassing word... Much like the word sound... We can put a negative connotation on that as well... as far as: what is unpleasant noise? That is completely subjective. So I guess we can go on and on with semantics, but as Merzbow said, to paraphrase, "if noise is defined as unpleasant sound than pop music is noise to me."
_________________
analoguemind.zy8.org
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Antimon



Joined: Jan 18, 2005
Posts: 4145
Location: Sweden
Audio files: 371
G2 patch files: 100

PostPosted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

www.m-w.com on "noise":

"2 a : SOUND; especially : one that lacks agreeable musical quality or is noticeably unpleasant b : any sound that is undesired or interferes with one's hearing of something c : an unwanted signal or a disturbance (as static or a variation of voltage) in an electronic device or instrument (as radio or television); broadly : a disturbance interfering with the operation of a usually mechanical device or system d : electromagnetic radiation (as light or radio waves) that is composed of several frequencies and that involves random changes in frequency or amplitude e : irrelevant or meaningless data or output occurring along with desired information

(...)

6 : a style of rock music that is loud, often discordant, and usually uses electronic noise (as feedback)"

/Stefan

_________________
Antimon's Window
@soundcloud @Flattr home - you can't explain music
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
flowersniffer7



Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Posts: 53
Location: Allentown PA

PostPosted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 9:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Antimon wrote:
www.m-w.com on "noise":

"2 a : SOUND; especially : one that lacks agreeable musical quality or is noticeably unpleasant b : any sound that is undesired or interferes with one's hearing of something c : an unwanted signal or a disturbance (as static or a variation of voltage) in an electronic device or instrument (as radio or television); broadly : a disturbance interfering with the operation of a usually mechanical device or system d : electromagnetic radiation (as light or radio waves) that is composed of several frequencies and that involves random changes in frequency or amplitude e : irrelevant or meaningless data or output occurring along with desired information

(...)

6 : a style of rock music that is loud, often discordant, and usually uses electronic noise (as feedback)"

/Stefan


As with every time this "arguement comes up, somebody wants to bring up semantics... As I said earlier it is useless to do so, because you pulled 2 of 6 definitions of noise off of merium webster... Lets take a look at all of them:
1 : loud, confused, or senseless shouting or outcry
2 a : SOUND; especially : one that lacks agreeable musical quality or is noticeably unpleasant b : any sound that is undesired or interferes with one's hearing of something c : an unwanted signal or a disturbance (as static or a variation of voltage) in an electronic device or instrument (as radio or television); broadly : a disturbance interfering with the operation of a usually mechanical device or system d : electromagnetic radiation (as light or radio waves) that is composed of several frequencies and that involves random changes in frequency or amplitude e : irrelevant or meaningless data or output occurring along with desired information
3 : common talk : RUMOR; especially : SLANDER
4 : something that attracts attention <the>
5 : something spoken or uttered
6 : a style of rock music that is loud, often discordant, and usually uses electronic noise (as feedback)

In all, I'd say this is pretty broad, and the only definitions that suggest any negative connotation are directly reffering to either the specific genre of music or a scientific anomoly... Noise can also be as stated above: "a disturbance interfering with the operation of a usually mechanical device or system ."
However lets use some common sense here and sort through what applies to sound specifically.
"something that attracts attention."
pretty broad, not negative or positive.
"an unwanted signal or a disturbance (as static or a variation of voltage) in an electronic device or instrument (as radio or television)."
this is obviously not referencing sound.
1. sound, esp. of a loud, harsh, or confused kind: deafening noises.
2. a sound of any kind: to hear a noise at the door.
3. loud shouting, outcry, or clamor.
4. a nonharmonious or discordant group of sounds.
5. an electric disturbance in a communications system that interferes with or prevents reception of a signal or of information, as the buzz on a telephone or snow on a television screen.
6. Informal. extraneous, irrelevant, or meaningless facts, information, statistics, etc.: The noise in the report obscured its useful information.
7. Obsolete. rumor or gossip, esp. slander.
We can go on and on here... yet it is obvious to see which definitions are directly influenced by the modern connotation on noise and which ones are broad and have more application... such as: 2. a sound of any kind: to hear a noise at the door.
A noise simply defined can be any audible sound. The negative connotation as I said before has been completely and 100% affected.
The point I was trying to make, remains the same... The semantics remain subjective...

_________________
analoguemind.zy8.org
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Antimon



Joined: Jan 18, 2005
Posts: 4145
Location: Sweden
Audio files: 371
G2 patch files: 100

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 2:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

flowersniffer7 wrote:

As with every time this "arguement comes up, somebody wants to bring up semantics...


Sorry about that Very Happy I think languages are fun, and since you wrote

Quote:
In any definition I have ever read of noise, nowhere does it necessarily describe unpleasant sound or dissonance


I thought it would be interesting to see what a dictionary has to say about the definition. I cut out the paragraphs that seemed to be about sound - the others were about talking or machinery or stuff. I think the meaning of the numbered paragraphs is that it will be obvious in a sentence if the word "noise" corresponds to 1, 2, 3 etc. We're talking about 2, I guess, but sometimes miscommunication is caused by confusing various meanings of a word with each other.

I'm a bit out of my depth, since english isn't my natural language, but at the same time it's a bit enlightening when you try to translate and realize that it works differently in other languages. Especially, translating "noise" to my own language results in very different words depending on whether you mean an unpleasant noise, white noise, background noise etc.

Subjective is fine when it comes to what kind of music you enjoy, or even what you consider to be music, but I think a word like "noise" should be able to have a well-defined meaning (within a context). After that you can start to argue wether it is good or bad in different situations.

/Stefan

_________________
Antimon's Window
@soundcloud @Flattr home - you can't explain music
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
flowersniffer7



Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Posts: 53
Location: Allentown PA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 4:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Antimon wrote:
flowersniffer7 wrote:

As with every time this "arguement comes up, somebody wants to bring up semantics...


Sorry about that Very Happy I think languages are fun, and since you wrote

Quote:
In any definition I have ever read of noise, nowhere does it necessarily describe unpleasant sound or dissonance


I thought it would be interesting to see what a dictionary has to say about the definition. I cut out the paragraphs that seemed to be about sound - the others were about talking or machinery or stuff. I think the meaning of the numbered paragraphs is that it will be obvious in a sentence if the word "noise" corresponds to 1, 2, 3 etc. We're talking about 2, I guess, but sometimes miscommunication is caused by confusing various meanings of a word with each other.

I'm a bit out of my depth, since english isn't my natural language, but at the same time it's a bit enlightening when you try to translate and realize that it works differently in other languages. Especially, translating "noise" to my own language results in very different words depending on whether you mean an unpleasant noise, white noise, background noise etc.

Subjective is fine when it comes to what kind of music you enjoy, or even what you consider to be music, but I think a word like "noise" should be able to have a well-defined meaning (within a context). After that you can start to argue wether it is good or bad in different situations.

/Stefan


I did write that, and it wasn't necessarily meant in any dictionary context... If I wanted to go into actual definitions I would have pulled one, however that wasn't what I was implying... I was suggesting that as with the second definition on wikipedia... Noise has been a word that has existed in many languages and applies to "any sound."
The negative connotation has only developed with 20th century definitions unless you want to go so far as to say that the word noise is translated from the latin word that had a second meaning, "nausea." However, As you can see looking into the history of the word on wikipedia and I ams sure you can find more in depth discussions on the linguistics elsewhere, it has been used for centuries in english to describe... "any sound," without regard to any negative or positive connotation.
So in regards to what I said... You'll have to excuse the way I worded it, but I think everybody understands fully what I meant. Hence my comment on semantics. We could go on for days about the linguistic meaning of the word... or we could discuss more realistically the actual connotation of the word... The negative of which is only really a percieved negative not by any means an implicit negative, or in my opinion an express negative either.
I make noise and as much as I don't like to label things... I don't really find that describing it as noise should give any open minded listener any negative preconceptions... It will just allow those who enjoy the "genre," to explore similar sounds without having to deal with the crap they don't want to search through...
albeit there is plenty of crap in any genre, but it limits your search to categorize, and I think that is the only legitimate purpose of labelling anything noise.

_________________
analoguemind.zy8.org
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
mosc
Site Admin


Joined: Jan 31, 2003
Posts: 18240
Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 224
G2 patch files: 60

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 7:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

It is interesting that words that have multiple definitions are not always consistent. If noise is the name of a style of music, then it is just a name, like hip hop - there is nothing hip about hip hop; at least as I understand the connotations for the word hip, as in hippy. Music that is categorized as being in the style noise can be downright beautiful and very pleasant. These genre names can be useful, like you say, but they are also very imprecise and sometimes inappropriate.

Another interesting word is bad, which sometimes means good. Another interesting one these days is the word nigga, which can be a friendly jibe or a racist insult depending on the perceived racial characteristics of the speaker.

_________________
--Howard
my music and other stuff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
flowersniffer7



Joined: Nov 17, 2006
Posts: 53
Location: Allentown PA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 8:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

mosc wrote:
It is interesting that words that have multiple definitions are not always consistent. If noise is the name of a style of music, then it is just a name, like hip hop - there is nothing hip about hip hop; at least as I understand the connotations for the word hip, as in hippy. Music that is categorized as being in the style noise can be downright beautiful and very pleasant. These genre names can be useful, like you say, but they are also very imprecise and sometimes inappropriate.

Another interesting word is bad, which sometimes means good. Another interesting one these days is the word nigga, which can be a friendly jibe or a racist insult depending on the perceived racial characteristics of the speaker.


quite right... Its all about the perception and those who are open minded enough don't use such words to base their judgement on, they listen and say I like, or I dislike and thats it...

_________________
analoguemind.zy8.org
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
bachus



Joined: Feb 29, 2004
Posts: 2922
Location: Up in that tree over there.
Audio files: 5

PostPosted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 7:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

flowersniffer7 wrote:
... Its all about the perception and those who are open minded enough don't use such words to base their judgement on, they listen and say I like, or I dislike and thats it...


If one is both open minded enough and has some self awareness one might add descriptive (not judgmental explanations) e.g. "I did not like it because there are a lot of bagpipes used in the piece and I dislike bagpipes."

_________________
The question is not whether they can talk or reason, but whether they can suffer. -- Jeremy Bentham
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
seraph
Editor
Editor


Joined: Jun 21, 2003
Posts: 12398
Location: Firenze, Italy
Audio files: 33
G2 patch files: 2

PostPosted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 8:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

well...if you are too open-minded your brains will fall out
Shocked

_________________
homepage - blog - forum - youtube

Quote:
Don't die with your music still in you - Wayne Dyer
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
elektro80
Site Admin


Joined: Mar 25, 2003
Posts: 21959
Location: Norway
Audio files: 14

PostPosted: Sat Dec 02, 2006 8:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

seraph wrote:
well...if you are too open-minded your brains will fall out
Shocked


Are you completely sure you are not a viking? Laughing

_________________
A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"

MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic Moderators: elektro80
Page 2 of 3 [74 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Goto page: Previous 1, 2, 3 Next
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
 Forum index » Discussion » Composition
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Copyright © 2003 through 2009 by electro-music.com - Conditions Of Use