Author |
Message |
dmacintyre
Joined: Aug 23, 2006 Posts: 9 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 9:53 am Post subject:
G2 and Logic / VI Questions |
 |
|
Hi All,
First post on the forum (hello). I was interested in buying a Virus Ti and whilst researching it stumbled across the G2, downloaded the NMG2 demo and now I am really confused and tempted by the G2. Not confused about the relative merits - I get that the Ti sounds good for what it does but the G2 has a much broader spectrum of current and potential sounds.
What I would like to know is how does it integrate with my sequencer (Logic Pro)? Is it a case of editing patches in the software, saving them to the G2 then triggering the G2 as a VI plugin in Logic? If so, is the g2 installed as an AU? How does the process actually work - I've skimmed the manual but can't see this anywhere. Can the 4 separate patches be triggered from 4 separate instrument tracks?
Also, I have Reaktor 5, amongst other soft synths. Is the NMG2 software editor doing much the same thing albeit with the benefit of DSP processing in the hardware?
Many thanks for any help. As you are probably aware, it can be quite confusing.
Regards
David |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
blue hell
Site Admin

Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24422 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 297
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:09 am Post subject:
Re: G2 and Logic / VI Questions |
 |
|
dmacintyre wrote: | (hello). |
David.
Quote: | it can be quite confusing. |
Apparently As you are not the first one to ask this, mayebe it is the demo software that causes some confusion.
The G2 is a standalone hardware synth, it has no vsti integration. The editor can only be used to make patches for the synth and to transfer them to the synth and the USB connection is only used for that purpose, it does not transfer MIDI or audio.
When you want to control the G2 from the computer you'll have to connect it with a MIDI cable cable and send it note on/off and controller messages. The only way to get audio from it is to connect it's audio outputs to your soundcard's inputs. The only way to send audio to it is to use your soundcard adio outputs connected to the G2's audio inputs.
Hope it's not too disappointing ... as it's a great synth ... _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
 |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
sheridan

Joined: Jun 05, 2005 Posts: 473 Location: London, England
Audio files: 27
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 4:01 pm Post subject:
Re: G2 and Logic / VI Questions |
 |
|
Blue Hell wrote: | The only way to get audio from it is to connect it's audio outputs to your soundcard's inputs. The only way to send audio to it is to use your soundcard adio outputs connected to the G2's audio inputs. |
...unless you have a mixer.
Also, the G2 patch parameters can also be automated from Logic using MIDI controller data, but you will have to set up which controller numbers control which parameters... not a difficult job on the G2.
It is probably worth pointing out that the Virus can produce certain types of sounds very well (and better than the G2), while the G2 can produce sounds that the Virus simply can't... my point is simply try before you buy. Download some of the available patches here to see if the G2's (well talked about) sound is the one you're after.  _________________
Sheridan
Hear music and Nord Modular G2 patches and find out music production tips at
http://www.nitetimeproductions.co.uk |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
dmacintyre
Joined: Aug 23, 2006 Posts: 9 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 3:04 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Thanks for the replies.
I think I might go for a used G2 engine as I already have a good hammer weighted keyboard. What about my question regarding doubling of functionality with Reaktor? It seems to do the same thing albeit with the benefit of DSP. I know the Nord has a unique sound but can't I duplicate things in Reaktor (in fact I think I have seen a Nord ensemble for Reaktor). Any opinions on a comparison?
Thanks and regards
David |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
erstlaub

Joined: Jul 13, 2006 Posts: 98 Location: Scotland
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 4:03 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
To use a fairly vague analogy.
The comparisson between the two is a bit like using a pencil and paper or a pen and some different paper.
You will be able to draw up pretty much anything you like with either, it comes down to whether you like the look and feel of pen or pencil more.
With regards to the Reaktor Nord Ensemble, and I haven't seen it so I may be wrong, but it is more likely to be an emulation of one of the other Nord's maybe a lead or electro or something as a modulator emulating another modular is a bit of an odd concept to me, unless of course someone has macro'd all the modules available for the Nord but even then, it seems sort of limiting.
Different platforms really, I'd say the main massive benefit of the G2 is that it uses zero overhead on your processor meaning that it is totally stable and you can make incredibly complex patches without your computer freaking out, on the minus side, Reaktor does a lot of things that either can't be done on the G2 or can be done with a massive amount of brainache and work such as the internal sampling and recording. You will need to hook up the audio from the Nord into your computer so a soundcard with sufficient inputs will also be necessary.
That's just my thoughts on the subject, as I've been biased towards Nord Modular's for years now I'd recommend getting the engine but I'd probably recommend it to everyone whether they asked me to or not. As with the original NM, the G2 is definitely the last synth I'll ever need to buy (until the emergence of the next generation of course!) |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Fozzie

Joined: Jun 04, 2004 Posts: 875 Location: Near Wageningen, the Netherlands
Audio files: 8
G2 patch files: 49
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 4:10 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
dmacintyre wrote: | Thanks for the replies.
I think I might go for a used G2 engine as I already have a good hammer weighted keyboard. What about my question regarding doubling of functionality with Reaktor? It seems to do the same thing albeit with the benefit of DSP. I know the Nord has a unique sound but can't I duplicate things in Reaktor (in fact I think I have seen a Nord ensemble for Reaktor). Any opinions on a comparison?
Thanks and regards
David |
I have no personal experience with Reaktor, but I know there are more people around here that use the combination, and have commented on the difference in working style. The G2 is said to be much more direct in patching, while Reaktor allows deeper programming and sample-based stuff, but takes hours to make a simple patch which can be done in a few minutes on a G2.
I think there will not be many things in a G2 that cannot be done in Reaktor, but it's a very different style of working. The Nord ensemble will probably be a Nord Lead imitation, not a G2 imitation. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
dmacintyre
Joined: Aug 23, 2006 Posts: 9 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 4:22 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Thanks for the responses. I think I get the idea - emulation is never quite like the real thing no matter how good. I think I'll take the plunge with a G2 engine. More questions will no doubt ensue.
Cheers!
David |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
dmacintyre
Joined: Aug 23, 2006 Posts: 9 Location: Scotland
|
Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 2:10 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Purchase fell through due to seller not being able to accept Paypal so I am looking for a good used G2 Engine. Will post in the Buy and Sell too.
Regards
David |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|