| Author |
Message |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 2:54 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
| BobTheDog wrote: |
edit: Actually the component differencs are not much more here at $322.66, processors 1,818.19. So I was wrong about that! Things must have changed since I last looked at these things.
Cheers
Andy |
The component prices have changed a bit since the introduction of the Mac Pro, but the product as it stands is still a great buy all things considered.
Apple is also "updating" the products as newer and slightly faster CPUs become available. There has already been a long series of small revisions of all the Intel powered macs. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Kassen
Janitor


Joined: Jul 06, 2004 Posts: 7678 Location: The Hague, NL
G2 patch files: 3
|
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 3:05 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
| Eggotrip wrote: |
Personally, I've given up on CPU gaming for the same reason I'm not missing DIY computing - consoles have more uptime. Less time fiddling with installing, settings, upgrades, fixes, frame rate issues, etc. Also more variety of games, |
So true. You can crash a console too (I did a few times) but contrary to Mac's (who do crash) or Windows (which crashes) you'll never lose any serious work!
;¬) _________________ Kassen |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
dmosc
Joined: Jun 23, 2003 Posts: 298
|
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:53 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
here are the mac's specs and US price:
$2,499 + $0 shipping = $2,499
2x 2.66ghz woodcrest processors
Intel mobo
1gb (2x512mb) 667mhz ECC DDR2
250GB SATA HD
Geforce 7300GT 256mb
16x DVD
case/psu
$2,041.62 + $$30.84 shipping = $2,072.46
2x http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16819117089
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813151023
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16820141018
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16822144417
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814139006
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16827136088
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16811129150
so you pay about $400 for the 1 year warrantee (most of the individual parts have that anyway), the OS, somebody to have built it for you, and the MAC logo.
Now, if you were to change the default equipment any at all, the price difference jumps. Most PC producers make most of their money in "upgrades" or "downgrades" off of a speced system. The base price difference is:
$2499 - $2,072.46 = $426.54
Lets say you decide you like those 3.0Ghz processors instead of the 2.66s. Now the mac price goes to $3299 and the PC price remains a more rational $2,434.46 raising the difference in price to $864.54!! Similarly, lets say you felt 2.0GHZ was enough. Well, apple will save you $300 taking it down to $2199 for you, aren't they nice? The PC drops to $1,340.48 making the difference a similarly nausiating $858.52. I hate to do the math, but that's a 64% markup!
[edit - changed 36% to 64% at dmosc's request. --mosc]
It gets much much worse if you start throwing in more ram (I can't imagine wanting only 1gb of ram in your workstation/server anyway) or more hard drives. Doubling the ram costs $300 but carrys a parts cost of about $90. Similarly, somebody might want to tell apple that you can get SATA hard drives for a lot less than $400 a pop. They're actually less than half that much:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16822136014
Bottom line, $2,499 is not that bad a price but if you start adding options like ram, HDs, etc or even changing the processor clock, they're really taking you to the cleaners. If you don't want to build it yourself, you can always call somebody like monarchpc up, they're great and the markups they charge are usually closer to 10% which is much more reasonable. Course, if your application is MAC-only, you don't have much choice on economics. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Eggotrip
Joined: Sep 19, 2006 Posts: 6 Location: Atlanta
|
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 2:23 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
There really isn't any reason to buy things like ram or extra hdd's from apple. The case design makes adding those very easy and cheaper.
Part of the idea of getting a MP for me was for long-term upgrades. In the long run I expect to get 2x Core 2 Quads after they've had significant price drops. Shortly I plan to buy two 250 gigs to create a striped raid. So the best comparison really is that base system like you've detailed. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Kassen
Janitor


Joined: Jul 06, 2004 Posts: 7678 Location: The Hague, NL
G2 patch files: 3
|
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 5:14 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Nice to see that article points out how odd the G4/5 to Intell switch realy went. _________________ Kassen |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
BobTheDog

Joined: Feb 28, 2005 Posts: 4044 Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15
|
Posted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 8:47 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Hi,
My time to make the machine would be much more than $400 thats for sure!
Also it looks rather nice, It is well engineered and nearly silent. Does you price include a silent case and fans?
Cheers
Andy |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18274 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 232
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:15 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
The article says: "After all, among first tier OEMs in the U.S., Apple is the only one remaining that buys CPUs exclusively from Intel. "
Considering how long it tool Apple to get to Intel, how long before an AMD Mac? _________________ --Howard
my music and other stuff |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Eggotrip
Joined: Sep 19, 2006 Posts: 6 Location: Atlanta
|
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:23 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I've been an AMD fan - but this is the first time in years where Intel actually has the better chips on both laptop and desktop fronts. When that changes, it might matter to me about Apple using AMD. But if it was a neck and neck competition, such as Nvidia vs. ATI - then its a mute point to me.
Dell only started offering AMD recently, which is funny that this happened only AFTER the shift of best in price/power/performance went to Intel. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|