electro-music.com   Dedicated to experimental electro-acoustic
and electronic music
 
    Front Page  |  Radio
 |  Media  |  Forum  |  Wiki  |  Links
Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
 FAQFAQ   CalendarCalendar   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   LinksLinks
 RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in  Chat RoomChat Room 
 Forum index » News... » Apple Computers
Block diagram of the Mac Pro
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Page 2 of 2 [34 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
Goto page: Previous 1, 2
Author Message
elektro80
Site Admin


Joined: Mar 25, 2003
Posts: 21959
Location: Norway
Audio files: 14

PostPosted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 2:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

BobTheDog wrote:

edit: Actually the component differencs are not much more here at $322.66, processors 1,818.19. So I was wrong about that! Things must have changed since I last looked at these things.


Cheers

Andy


The component prices have changed a bit since the introduction of the Mac Pro, but the product as it stands is still a great buy all things considered.
Apple is also "updating" the products as newer and slightly faster CPUs become available. There has already been a long series of small revisions of all the Intel powered macs.

_________________
A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"

MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Kassen
Janitor
Janitor


Joined: Jul 06, 2004
Posts: 7678
Location: The Hague, NL
G2 patch files: 3

PostPosted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 3:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Eggotrip wrote:

Personally, I've given up on CPU gaming for the same reason I'm not missing DIY computing - consoles have more uptime. Less time fiddling with installing, settings, upgrades, fixes, frame rate issues, etc. Also more variety of games,



So true. You can crash a console too (I did a few times) but contrary to Mac's (who do crash) or Windows (which crashes) you'll never lose any serious work!

;¬)

_________________
Kassen
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
dmosc



Joined: Jun 23, 2003
Posts: 298

PostPosted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 11:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

here are the mac's specs and US price:

$2,499 + $0 shipping = $2,499
2x 2.66ghz woodcrest processors
Intel mobo
1gb (2x512mb) 667mhz ECC DDR2
250GB SATA HD
Geforce 7300GT 256mb
16x DVD
case/psu

$2,041.62 + $$30.84 shipping = $2,072.46
2x http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16819117089
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813151023
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16820141018
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16822144417
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814139006
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16827136088
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16811129150

so you pay about $400 for the 1 year warrantee (most of the individual parts have that anyway), the OS, somebody to have built it for you, and the MAC logo.

Now, if you were to change the default equipment any at all, the price difference jumps. Most PC producers make most of their money in "upgrades" or "downgrades" off of a speced system. The base price difference is:

$2499 - $2,072.46 = $426.54

Lets say you decide you like those 3.0Ghz processors instead of the 2.66s. Now the mac price goes to $3299 and the PC price remains a more rational $2,434.46 raising the difference in price to $864.54!! Similarly, lets say you felt 2.0GHZ was enough. Well, apple will save you $300 taking it down to $2199 for you, aren't they nice? The PC drops to $1,340.48 making the difference a similarly nausiating $858.52. I hate to do the math, but that's a 64% markup!

[edit - changed 36% to 64% at dmosc's request. --mosc]

It gets much much worse if you start throwing in more ram (I can't imagine wanting only 1gb of ram in your workstation/server anyway) or more hard drives. Doubling the ram costs $300 but carrys a parts cost of about $90. Similarly, somebody might want to tell apple that you can get SATA hard drives for a lot less than $400 a pop. They're actually less than half that much:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16822136014

Bottom line, $2,499 is not that bad a price but if you start adding options like ram, HDs, etc or even changing the processor clock, they're really taking you to the cleaners. If you don't want to build it yourself, you can always call somebody like monarchpc up, they're great and the markups they charge are usually closer to 10% which is much more reasonable. Course, if your application is MAC-only, you don't have much choice on economics.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
elektro80
Site Admin


Joined: Mar 25, 2003
Posts: 21959
Location: Norway
Audio files: 14

PostPosted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 1:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Right, this means we agree on the base systems being pretty decently priced. Very Happy


off topic: http://weblog.infoworld.com/enterprisemac/archives/2006/09/intel_endorses.html

_________________
A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"

MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Eggotrip



Joined: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 6
Location: Atlanta

PostPosted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 2:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

There really isn't any reason to buy things like ram or extra hdd's from apple. The case design makes adding those very easy and cheaper.

Part of the idea of getting a MP for me was for long-term upgrades. In the long run I expect to get 2x Core 2 Quads after they've had significant price drops. Shortly I plan to buy two 250 gigs to create a striped raid. So the best comparison really is that base system like you've detailed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Kassen
Janitor
Janitor


Joined: Jul 06, 2004
Posts: 7678
Location: The Hague, NL
G2 patch files: 3

PostPosted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 5:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

elektro80 wrote:

off topic: http://weblog.infoworld.com/enterprisemac/archives/2006/09/intel_endorses.html


Nice to see that article points out how odd the G4/5 to Intell switch realy went.

_________________
Kassen
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
BobTheDog



Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Posts: 4044
Location: England
Audio files: 32
G2 patch files: 15

PostPosted: Sun Sep 24, 2006 8:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

Hi,

My time to make the machine would be much more than $400 thats for sure!

Also it looks rather nice, It is well engineered and nearly silent. Does you price include a silent case and fans?

Cheers

Andy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mosc
Site Admin


Joined: Jan 31, 2003
Posts: 18274
Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 232
G2 patch files: 60

PostPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

The article says: "After all, among first tier OEMs in the U.S., Apple is the only one remaining that buys CPUs exclusively from Intel. "

Considering how long it tool Apple to get to Intel, how long before an AMD Mac?

_________________
--Howard
my music and other stuff
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address
Eggotrip



Joined: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: 6
Location: Atlanta

PostPosted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote  Mark this post and the followings unread

I've been an AMD fan - but this is the first time in years where Intel actually has the better chips on both laptop and desktop fronts. When that changes, it might matter to me about Apple using AMD. But if it was a neck and neck competition, such as Nvidia vs. ATI - then its a mute point to me.

Dell only started offering AMD recently, which is funny that this happened only AFTER the shift of best in price/power/performance went to Intel.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Page 2 of 2 [34 Posts]
View unread posts
View new posts in the last week
Goto page: Previous 1, 2
Mark the topic unread :: View previous topic :: View next topic
 Forum index » News... » Apple Computers
Jump to:  

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Forum with support of Syndicator RSS
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Copyright © 2003 through 2009 by electro-music.com - Conditions Of Use