Author |
Message |
etaoin

Joined: Jun 30, 2005 Posts: 761 Location: Utrecht, NL
|
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:03 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Both Bridechamber and Magic Smoke sell 2k tempco's.
Ray Wilson also sells them, but that is the expensive PT146 version. _________________ http://www.casia.org/modular/ |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
LetterBeacon
Joined: Mar 18, 2008 Posts: 454 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 7:12 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Cool, thanks for that. Bridechamber also stock the CA3086 that this circuit requires. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
e-grad
Joined: Sep 12, 2008 Posts: 142 Location: Berlin
|
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 7:17 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
http://www.emulatorarchive.com/
stocks 1K87 TC, though PRICY.
The site is well worth a look for anyone interested in building ARP-cicuits. The cicuit for the Bananalogue Arp filter-clone was done by this guy. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
LetterBeacon
Joined: Mar 18, 2008 Posts: 454 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 7:33 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I emailed him a week or so ago, but he's out of stock.
How does the Bananalogue Arp filter-clone on that site compare with YuSynth's 4072 clone, by the way? |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Tim Servo

Joined: Jul 16, 2006 Posts: 924 Location: Silicon Valley
Audio files: 11
|
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 9:56 am Post subject:
Re: ARP Odyssey Oscillators |
 |
|
ericcoleridge wrote: | Tim Servo wrote: | Magic Smoke WILL have Ody VCO boards in about two to three months, for those who can wait (huff, puff, pant). I'm currently testing MKI vs. MKII flavors (huff, pant, wheeze) and we'll have them on a nice blue PCB (pant, gasp, wheeze). Along with some other interesting stuff. |
Just wondering what is the status of this Magic Smoke project, and if the Ody VCO will soon be available? Also curious as to what other "interesting stuff" is in the pipe-line? |
Well, we're just cranking away on this. Still, it's not ready yet as we've been busy with TH books and the new AS21C LFO. I've got to admit though, the ARP VCO is the one that I want most for myself! I've found some good NOS transistors, and some crosses for some other hard to find stuff, so finding good reliable sources for parts has really been the biggest time sink so far.
Other stuff? Well, I don't want to tip my hand too much, but basically, other AS21C boards, two new TH books, a full set of ARP clone stuff (I'd LOVE to do a clone of the Little Brother some day), and some AVR-based stuff... now all I need to do is order a few 27 hour days and I'm all set!
BTW, anybody know a good AVR programmer?
Tim (I had a hot flash and a brain freeze at the same time once... at least I think I did. I couldn't really tell because I balanced out at 98.6°F) Servo |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
urbanscallywag

Joined: Nov 30, 2007 Posts: 317 Location: sometimes
|
Posted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 9:51 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Tim,
You might sign onto the forum at AVRfreaks.net and look for someone there. There are many capable people who could probably help you out (I mean working for you, not just helping you with AVR). |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
LetterBeacon
Joined: Mar 18, 2008 Posts: 454 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 3:30 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
AndyR1960 wrote: | Rapid, here in the UK, stock all the odd value resistors (61.5k, 88.7k, 49.9k etc.) |
I don't suppose you have the order codes for those? I can't find them on Rapid's website at all! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Broadwave

Joined: Feb 16, 2007 Posts: 347 Location: Manchester UK
Audio files: 6
|
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:44 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
LetterBeacon wrote: | I can't find them on Rapid's website at all! |
These are the ones:
0.4W 0.1% Metal Film
Andy. _________________ Kronos 2-88, Kronos 61, Studiologic Sledge V2/SL, Broadwave ARP 2600EX, Broadwave 18U ARP based Eurorack Modular, Broadwave Minimoog Clone, GEM S2 Turbo.
Synth DIY Projects
Musical Doodlings |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ericcoleridge

Joined: Jan 16, 2007 Posts: 889 Location: NYC
|
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 12:45 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Andy, or anyone,
Is there a simple way to get a triangle wave from this VCO? I'm thinking, especially in LFO mode, a Tri-wave would be very useful. Perhaps I should just make a new post asking about Saw to Tri wave shapers-- but thought I'd ask here first.
edit: Just found this post with a few Saw/Tri Symetry Waveshapers:
http://electro-music.com/forum/viewtopic.php?highlight=triangle+waveshaper&t=27934 |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbertalk

Joined: May 05, 2008 Posts: 992 Location: Austin, TX
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 12:18 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
in wanting to understand things a little better, what exactly is the ppm rating for tempco resistors? For example, I find these 1.87K thermistors at Mouser:
http://www.mouser.com/Search/ProductDetail.aspx?qs=J16uGQxykBg%252bidq1SFDwWw%3d%3d
but notice their ppm rating is 100, which is much lower than the ones used in synth modules I've seen so far (3500ppm, right)? So what exactly does this rating mean and why aren't the ones at Mouser sufficient? |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Tim Servo

Joined: Jul 16, 2006 Posts: 924 Location: Silicon Valley
Audio files: 11
|
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 12:57 pm Post subject:
ARP Odyssey Oscillators |
 |
|
There is a very nice SMT tempco from Digi-Key that has the proper specs:
Digikey P1.8KCDCT-ND (page 1814 in the current catalog)
Note that these are surface mount, and are 1.8K, rather than 1.87K. Should work, but it's probably worth a test run first. I believe the tempco resistors you were looking at from Mouser are the NTC (negative temp coefficient) type, which are primarily used for surge protection.
Dave Brown did a really nice job placing a couple of these resistors (two 1.0K units in series) in epoxy on top of the 2164 chip in a Mankato
http://modularsynthesis.com/magicsmoke/mankato/mse.htm
Tim (should work, maybe) Servo |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
frijitz
Joined: May 04, 2007 Posts: 1734 Location: NM USA
Audio files: 54
|
Posted: Tue Dec 02, 2008 2:51 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
numbertalk wrote: | in wanting to understand things a little better, what exactly is the ppm rating for tempco resistors? For example, I find these 1.87K thermistors at Mouser:
http://www.mouser.com/Search/ProductDetail.aspx?qs=J16uGQxykBg%252bidq1SFDwWw%3d%3d
but notice their ppm rating is 100, which is much lower than the ones used in synth modules I've seen so far (3500ppm, right)? So what exactly does this rating mean and why aren't the ones at Mouser sufficient? |
The use of a tempco in a VCO is to compensate for the temperature dependence of the expo transistor. The correct value is 1/(absolute temperature) = 3300 ppm/K. This number is the amount the resistance changes as the temperature changes.
A 100 ppm/K tempco is the tempco of platinum wire. This is used for accurate, stable temperature sensors.
More at my website:
http://home.comcast.net/~ijfritz/sy_cir7.htm
Ian |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbertalk

Joined: May 05, 2008 Posts: 992 Location: Austin, TX
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Wed Dec 03, 2008 8:48 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Thanks Ian! Going to read your site now - looks like a lot of math so going to plan to take a close look. Offhand not sure if the 100ppm/K tempco being more accurate and stable is a good thing or a bad thing for a synth builder. I'm sure reading the page you link to will clear that up for me.
frijitz wrote: | The use of a tempco in a VCO is to compensate for the temperature dependence of the expo transistor. The correct value is 1/(absolute temperature) = 3300 ppm/K. This number is the amount the resistance changes as the temperature changes.
A 100 ppm/K tempco is the tempco of platinum wire. This is used for accurate, stable temperature sensors.
More at my website:
http://home.comcast.net/~ijfritz/sy_cir7.htm
Ian |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
bubblechamber

Joined: Nov 04, 2006 Posts: 280 Location: NYC
Audio files: 1
|
Posted: Thu Dec 04, 2008 3:47 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
the DigiKey tempcos work really well and i believe there are a couple commercial VCOs that use them. the easiest way i've seen these used is to solder the tempco under a LM395 or SSM chip then solder the chip in with out a socket. it's a bit of a pain, but at $.55 each it's worth it. _________________ You can check your anatomy all you want, and even though there may be normal variation, when it comes right down to it, this far inside the head it all looks the same. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Dan Lavin

Joined: Nov 09, 2006 Posts: 649 Location: Spring Lake, Mi, USA
Audio files: 21
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 9:09 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Numbertalk,
OK, I guess it’s that time of year for my yearly lecture on what people on this forum refer to as “tempcos”. If you walk up to any EE and start talking about “tempcos,” you will either get a blank stare or a return question of “Tempco of what?!?” Tempco is short for temperature coefficient or how much something changes in relationship with temperature. All electronic components, (as far as I know), have some type of relationship with temperature and therefore all components have “tempcos”. Some have more change with temperature change and some less.
The component that is used mostly to temperature compensate electronic music circuits are technically called “linear positive temperature coefficient thermistors.” People in the industry, (as I have been for more years that I care to admit), would call them linear PTC thermistors. They are linear because their resistance changes linearly with temperature and they have a positive temperature coefficient because their resistance increases with temperature. There are switching type PTC thermistors, which have a zener-diode-like resistance increase with temperature, and there are logarithmic NTC (negative temperature coefficient) thermistors, both of which are actually more common than the linear PTC Thermistors we use in our E-M circuits.
Linear PTC thermistors are primarily speced with 2 pieces of information: the resistance at 25deg C (77degF) and the rate of change. Rate of change for NTC’s are expressed in %/degC (or K…makes no difference) because their rates of change are quite dramatic: 3-5%/degC. Linear PTCs have rates of change less than 1%/degC, so they are expressed in terms of ppm or parts per million. 1% = 10,000ppm, 0.1% = 1000 ppm, so 3350ppm = 0.335%/degC (or K, whichever you prefer).
Here’s how a 1K ohm/+3300ppm works: At 25C, the device is, of course, 1000 ohms. At 26C, the device would be 1000 ohms + (1000 * 0.0033) = 1003.3 ohms. At 24C, the resistance would be 1000 ohms – (1000*0.0033) = 996.7 ohms.
I blame the whole calling linear PTCs “tempcos” on the early data books from SSM. SSM was the first company marketing E-M specific chips and thus widely read by us early E-M enthusiasts. They labeled the thermistors as “1K +3300ppm tempco” for instance. I think people assumed “tempco” was the name of the device rather than an appreviation for temperature coefficient.
Sorry if this is more information than you needed and I hope I haven’t put too many people to sleep. Now imagine doing this for decades and you’ll understand why I am the way I am! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
LetterBeacon
Joined: Mar 18, 2008 Posts: 454 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 9:30 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Very informative - thanks a lot! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbertalk

Joined: May 05, 2008 Posts: 992 Location: Austin, TX
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 9:50 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Yes, thanks for all that info! With the link from Ian that's so informative, even if some of it is above my head at the moment (mostly the math on Ian's site ) |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
frijitz
Joined: May 04, 2007 Posts: 1734 Location: NM USA
Audio files: 54
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 12:13 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
antman49443 wrote: | The component that is used mostly to temperature compensate electronic music circuits are technically called “linear positive temperature coefficient thermistors.” People in the industry, (as I have been for more years that I care to admit), would call them linear PTC thermistors. |
Hmmm ... to me "thermistor" usually refers to a ceramic material. (See the WIKI article.) The tempcos we use are metal alloys, more like an RTD than a thermistor.
Quote: | They are linear because their resistance changes linearly with temperature and they have a positive temperature coefficient because their resistance increases with temperature. |
The ideal is what is refered to as a PTAT resistor (Proportional To Absolute Temperature). In other words, R = AT, where A is a constant and T is absolute (Kelvin) temperature. Of course, the resistor needs to have this dependence only near room temperature, i.e. its resistance should extrapolate to R = 0 at T = 0.
With this dependence the exponential I/V relation of a transistor is
I ~ exp(V/kT) ~ exp(const*Vin*T/k*T) ~ exp(const*Vin).
I.e., the PTAT response cancels the T term in the denominator of the exponent.
Looking at things this way, the ideal tempco is just 1/T. Which is ~3350 ppm/K at room temperature.
All metals have resistance linear with temperature at high enough temperature, i.e., R = AT + B. The trick is to find an alloy with B = 0. Actually, it turns out that pure copper is close to a PTAT material. But its resistivity is so low that it is impractical to use it for tempco resistors.
Ian |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Dan Lavin

Joined: Nov 09, 2006 Posts: 649 Location: Spring Lake, Mi, USA
Audio files: 21
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 6:07 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Quote: | Hmmm ... to me "thermistor" usually refers to a ceramic material. (See the WIKI article.) The tempcos we use are metal alloys, more like an RTD than a thermistor. |
Well, actually my company makes thermistors out of polymer, thin and thick films, silicon as well as the traditional metal oxide ceramics as mentioned in the WIKI article. I probably know the people that wrote the WIKI article and it not totally inclusive of the industry. The larger, older +3300ppm devices are undoubtedly based on metal wire as you mentioned..I'm sure that's why they're so big..they're basically wirewound resistors with high temperature coefficient wire. But the new stuff all seems to be thin/thick film.
Just for grins I did a couple of google searches. "Tempco" was next to worthless: I got a bunch of E-M links with quite a few back to our forum here. High TCR resistors did OK (TCR= temperature coefficient of resistance) but by far, the best search results came from "Linear PTC thermistors."
Quote: | Looking at things this way, the ideal tempco is just 1/T. Which is ~3350 ppm/K at room temperature |
Absolutely! Thanks for your link explaining the math! I've always seen that written but never explained fully. Brilliant explanation!
OK, now that Ian and I have totally put everyone on this thread to sleep, I promise not to talk about "tempcos" again this year (unless someone asks) and we can resume normal thread conversation. The Ody VCO's are definitely a cool project! Sorry! regards, Dan
[/quote] |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
frijitz
Joined: May 04, 2007 Posts: 1734 Location: NM USA
Audio files: 54
|
Posted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 11:39 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Dan --
I agree that "thermistor" includes more than just the common ceramic types. But if you make the term *too* general, then *any* conductor could be included.
I believe the term "tempco" as used in the EM community is shorthand for "temperature compensation" or "temperature compensating resistor". Easy to get this confused with "tempco" as "temperature coefficient". But "temperature compensating resistor" is pretty standard descriptive nomenclature -- e.g., see the old Analog Devices Nonlinear Handbook.
To get back to more practical matters, I think wirewound temperature compensating resistors are always going to be around. I just noticed that two of the suppliers that I have used in the past now have SMD wirewound temperature compensating resistors:
http://www.krlbantry.com/products/Precision/sect-311.htm
(see 3d bullet)
http://www.precisionresistor.com/pt-sp-series-positive-tcr-compensators-c-22.html
(see bottom of table)
It might be worth getting a quote on these. If they are as inexpensive as the Panasonic units Digi carries, it might be worth it to get some big batches made up for the particular temperature compensating resistors we need for different applications.
Ian |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbertalk

Joined: May 05, 2008 Posts: 992 Location: Austin, TX
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 1:27 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Another "tempco" related question - aren't the bodies of these usually physically fixed to a chip on the board using a thermal compound? I don't see any ICs within reach of where those resistors go on this board (and Andy I don't see them this way in the photos of your boards), Will they still work as well soldered in just like a normal resistor this way? |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
LetterBeacon
Joined: Mar 18, 2008 Posts: 454 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 3:17 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I think the tempco is supposed to be attached to the pair of transistors next to it on the PCB. Although Urbanscallywag said this on page two:
urbanscallywag wrote: | The funny thing about the tempco in the Odyssey is that they don't even touch the exponential pair in mine. |
On a slightly different topic:
AndyR1960 wrote: | Don't forget that the outputs are not the usual 10v PP centered around ground - Square is 0-5v and Saw is 0-6v, which doesn't really bother me, but some purists may want to level shift and amplify the outputs/ |
I'm planning on building these VCOs as part of a mini-modular system I'm putting together. How much of a problem will it be integrating the 0-5v and 0-6v outputs with regular 10vpp modules?
EDIT- Just seen this in another thread:
Tim Servo wrote: | Actually, I'd probably just add an op amp with a bit of gain to each of the VCOs. It would be a ridiculously easy circuit to put on a piece of perfboard and mount on the existing VCO boards. You'll probably want the standard +/-5V (10Vp-p) waveforms for use with other modular stuff, so it would be a very worthwhile mod. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbertalk

Joined: May 05, 2008 Posts: 992 Location: Austin, TX
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 3:39 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
LetterBeacon wrote: | I think the tempco is supposed to be attached to the pair of transistors next to it on the PCB. Although Urbanscallywag said this on page two:
urbanscallywag wrote: | The funny thing about the tempco in the Odyssey is that they don't even touch the exponential pair in mine. |
|
Interesting. I wasn't sure about that since there's much less surface area on the sides of transistors like these, but I did miss that.
So if you wanted to do so, would you make contact with the sides of the 2 transistors or on the tops?
LetterBeacon wrote: |
On a slightly different topic:
AndyR1960 wrote: | Don't forget that the outputs are not the usual 10v PP centered around ground - Square is 0-5v and Saw is 0-6v, which doesn't really bother me, but some purists may want to level shift and amplify the outputs/ |
I'm planning on building these VCOs as part of a mini-modular system I'm putting together. How much of a problem will it be integrating the 0-5v and 0-6v outputs with regular 10vpp modules?
EDIT- Just seen this in another thread:
Tim Servo wrote: | Actually, I'd probably just add an op amp with a bit of gain to each of the VCOs. It would be a ridiculously easy circuit to put on a piece of perfboard and mount on the existing VCO boards. You'll probably want the standard +/-5V (10Vp-p) waveforms for use with other modular stuff, so it would be a very worthwhile mod. |
|
Yep, that's from a thread I'd started. For this circuit you still might also want a way to center the waveforms around ground before or after amplifying. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
LetterBeacon
Joined: Mar 18, 2008 Posts: 454 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 4:03 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
numbertalk wrote: | LetterBeacon wrote: | I think the tempco is supposed to be attached to the pair of transistors next to it on the PCB. Although Urbanscallywag said this on page two:
urbanscallywag wrote: | The funny thing about the tempco in the Odyssey is that they don't even touch the exponential pair in mine. |
|
Interesting. I wasn't sure about that since there's much less surface area on the sides of transistors like these, but I did miss that.
So if you wanted to do so, would you make contact with the sides of the 2 transistors or on the tops? |
To be honest, I know very little about this sort of thing! Yves Usson goes talks about thermal coupling on his VCO page here. There's a picture of a tempco coupled with two transistors on that page, about halfway down.
numbertalk wrote: | For this circuit you still might also want a way to center the waveforms around ground before or after amplifying. |
Just realised that the Oddy circuit isn't 5vpp, it's range is 0-5v - I've been mis-reading it. How are you planning on centering the waveforms? I'm entirely out of my depth at this point! |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
numbertalk

Joined: May 05, 2008 Posts: 992 Location: Austin, TX
Audio files: 5
|
Posted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 8:49 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
LetterBeacon wrote: | numbertalk wrote: | LetterBeacon wrote: | I think the tempco is supposed to be attached to the pair of transistors next to it on the PCB. Although Urbanscallywag said this on page two:
urbanscallywag wrote: | The funny thing about the tempco in the Odyssey is that they don't even touch the exponential pair in mine. |
|
Interesting. I wasn't sure about that since there's much less surface area on the sides of transistors like these, but I did miss that.
So if you wanted to do so, would you make contact with the sides of the 2 transistors or on the tops? |
To be honest, I know very little about this sort of thing! Yves Usson goes talks about thermal coupling on his VCO page here. There's a picture of a tempco coupled with two transistors on that page, about halfway down. |
Ah, thanks for pointing that out. Have looked at that page before but planned to build that circuit using an IC so didn't pay attention to that bit. Thanks!
LetterBeacon wrote: |
numbertalk wrote: | For this circuit you still might also want a way to center the waveforms around ground before or after amplifying. |
Just realised that the Oddy circuit isn't 5vpp, it's range is 0-5v - I've been mis-reading it. How are you planning on centering the waveforms? I'm entirely out of my depth at this point! |
I have a Moogerfooger CP251 that has a mixer with an offset control that I'll probably use externally to this circuit. But if I understand correctly it's basically about mixing in a steady DC voltage with the input to the right op amp (not sure which one and don't have the schematics for this circuit in front of me). You could wire a pot like a voltage divider between the +V and ground, but there might be a little more to it than that (you might need to add other resistors or caps as well). I'm really new to this and still learning too, so please correct me if I'm wrong anyone and LetterBeacon don't feel discouraged!
EDIT - http://electro-music.com/forum/topic-30845-0.html&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight= |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|