Author |
Message |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18240 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 224
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 10:28 am Post subject:
Software for modular synthesis |
 |
|
On another topic about a new release of the os/editor for the Nord Modular G2 the question of appropriate software for modular synthesis came up. See: http://electro-music.com/forum/topic-31827.html
I thought I'd raise this as a new topic.
I'm not familiar with all of the software that is out there for modular synthesis, but I've used SynthEdit and SynthMaker. I wanted programs that make VSTs that could be posted that other people could use without having to already own a particular product, like NI Reaktor or MAX/MSP.
I like both programs very much, but I think SynthMaker is easier (IMHO) when you need very accurate control of feedback. This is the one I've been using.
Any other ideas? _________________ --Howard
my music and other stuff |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ark

Joined: Mar 06, 2008 Posts: 679 Location: New Jersey
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 31
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 10:40 am Post subject:
Re: Software for modular synthesis |
 |
|
mosc wrote: | Any other ideas? | Tassman, by Applied Acoustics.
It feels rather G2-ish to use, though there are subsantial architectural differences. One such difference is that it has subroutines -- that is, you can build patches that can act like modules inside other patches. Another is that the connections between the modules are stored separately from the module settings, so that you can save as many combinations of settings as you like for a single patch. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 10:44 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
Tassman is brilliant. It is a nice addition to my analog modular and the two NM-1 synths. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
rlainhart

Joined: Jun 07, 2006 Posts: 167 Location: Rockland County, NY
Audio files: 3
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ark

Joined: Mar 06, 2008 Posts: 679 Location: New Jersey
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 31
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 11:18 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
rlainhart wrote: | A more modern paradigm in modular synthesis is Reaktor, which is incredibly powerful and flexible. | Can you say more about Reaktor? I've seen mixed reviews of it -- especially including several complaints that it's too much of a cpu hog. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
buzzr
Joined: Dec 13, 2007 Posts: 360 Location: portland
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 12:02 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I'm seriously looking more into Reaktor. But some rather simple things I've tried to do I can't get to work.
Will have to dive into it more when I have time. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
buzzr
Joined: Dec 13, 2007 Posts: 360 Location: portland
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 1:13 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
ark wrote: | rlainhart wrote: | A more modern paradigm in modular synthesis is Reaktor, which is incredibly powerful and flexible. | Can you say more about Reaktor? I've seen mixed reviews of it -- especially including several complaints that it's too much of a cpu hog. |
I'm curious what the complaints are? It's rather cumbersome compared to the G2. Patching takes longer but when you look at the possibilities of Reaktor it really makes me drool.... But maybe I'm just kidding myself..? |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
ark

Joined: Mar 06, 2008 Posts: 679 Location: New Jersey
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 31
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 1:23 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
buzzr wrote: | I'm curious what the complaints are? It's rather cumbersome compared to the G2. Patching takes longer but when you look at the possibilities of Reaktor it really makes me drool.... But maybe I'm just kidding myself..? | Well, those are some complaints already. Another I've seen is that you run out of steam pretty quickly unless you have a really fast machine. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
buzzr
Joined: Dec 13, 2007 Posts: 360 Location: portland
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 3:43 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
When you look at the possibilities in Reaktor, that is what sparks my interest in it. If I have to learn how to use it, that's just part of the process.
If the G2 had everything Reaktor had I would say there is no other place to go....
Nords interface is the best, IMHO. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
hogberto
Joined: Mar 20, 2006 Posts: 53 Location: scotland
|
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 5:43 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
elektro80 wrote: | Tassman is brilliant.… |
+1
i don't pretend to have delved very deep into this synth yet. but to me it sounds really really good. and i find the interface much more, well, friendly that many other soft synths, reaktor included. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
Tim Kleinert
Joined: Mar 12, 2004 Posts: 1148 Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Audio files: 7
G2 patch files: 236
|
Posted: Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:14 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I've just downloaded the demo of VAZ modular and dabbled with it for an hour or so. I think it's GREAT! Very straightforward UI, very easy to use, gets you going within minutes, great-sounding modules (the comb filter is fantastic!), and the oscs can oversample and they pull off combinations of osc sync and FM without aliasing -hoorray!
->on my shopping list.
BTW: Reaktor is great. The sample-accurate Quantec Yardstick emulation some smart person cooked up is already worth more than the money you pay for this software. I'm currently only using it as a deluxe preset machine, as the Reaktor user library is full of really fantastic stuff. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
anachron
Joined: Apr 08, 2008 Posts: 7 Location: uk
|
Posted: Mon Feb 09, 2009 5:20 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I tend to use Max / MSP (but there is quite a learning curve...), you can build pluggo VST and soon, Max for Live (Ableton / C74), looks like it's going to be really good.
Otherwise i'll add a +1 for tassman, and a shout out to Zebra by U-he.
Reaktor is ok, but i found the programming to be unintuitive, and the software to be somewhat temperamental (YMMV). i was also a bit disappointed by the sound quality, for instance i found it difficult to get different tones out of the filter modules. but it does have a good preset archive... |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
doctorvague

Joined: Mar 14, 2007 Posts: 281 Location: new mexico
Audio files: 2
|
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 7:16 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
I really like Numerology http://www.five12.com/ although it's Mac only. Not sure if it exactly qualifies as 'modular', the way this thread might define it but I have used it that way as standalone as well as a front end controlling my (real) modular system. Numerology is built on modular synth principles but focuses more on sequencers and control and not sound generation itself. It hosts AU's though and the new version supports Rewire.
Cheers
Phil |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18240 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 224
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:05 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I don't have a Mac and I've lusted over this for a long time. _________________ --Howard
my music and other stuff |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:23 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
Numerology is brilliant. I´ve been tempted to put a mac mini with numerology installed into the modular for years. It doesn´t need much juice in order to run well so an older secondhand mac mini will do just fine. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18240 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 224
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:29 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
elektro80 wrote: | Numerology is brilliant. I´ve been tempted to put a mac mini with numerology installed into the modular for years. It doesn´t need much juice in order to run well so an older secondhand mac mini will do just fine. |
Cynthia might help.
http://www.cyndustries.com/modules_minimac.cfm _________________ --Howard
my music and other stuff |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:37 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I know, but I´ve already made a bracket for the dotcom/moog panels that fits the mac mini, but my wife doesn´t allow me to relocate the mac mini from the living room and into what she calls the "twilight zone". I´ll either have to buy her a brand new one for the living room, or I´ll have to find a cheap old one. That being said, my wife kinda gets what she wants.  _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
doctorvague

Joined: Mar 14, 2007 Posts: 281 Location: new mexico
Audio files: 2
|
Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 7:13 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
mosc wrote: |
I don't have a Mac and I've lusted over this for a long time. |
It's too bad the Intel cross-platform thing doesn't work both ways more easily. I run Windows XP on my MacPro more than OSX!
Mosc, I've got 2 G4's here with life left in them. I have to keep them to run Waveburner in OS9 for some tight deadline bread-and-butter audio work that I do (hence the need for a spare G4). If I can EVER find software to replace OS9 Waveburner features I will gladly ship you one of these. Unfortunately there's nothing on the horizon software-wise that fits the bill including the new WB that bundles with Logic. Sigh. That's not an empty promise, though, if something opens up I really will ship it to you if you want it.
Electro80 - glad to hear your enthusiasm for Numerology! How do you use it? Everybody seems to use it differently. Even though I'm a long time user I sometimes read others' description of how they're using it and haven't got a clue! I use it more.... hmm, I guess "algorithmically" is the best word - as a front end interactive music creation tool. One thing I love is the ability to add as much or as little randomity to the music and dynamically control it. I'm really looking forward to the addition of custom scales in Num2 - the next complete rev. Adding scales like Super-Locrian mode to Numerology makes me wanna say "Bwaaahaaahaaaa" and don a lab coat and never get a haircut.
Also I want to mention Reason, especially with the addition of the Thor synthesizer which is quite modular in itself. The way I use Reason is very modular-like with tons of patch cord on the back, lots of interactive patching of sequencers, CV splits, etc. I've done some *really abstract stuff that I think most people wouldn't associate with Reason as it is "normally" used. I don't think it's fully appreciated for all the capabilities that are there and kinda gets dismissed as lesser or toy-like. It is limiting in the sense you're "in the box" of Reason and it doesn't send out MIDI per se. OTOH Rewire works great for slaving Reason and you can use it as an enormous modular VI.
Cheers
Phil _________________ doctorvague's youtube channel |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
GovernorSilver

Joined: Apr 26, 2004 Posts: 1349 Location: Washington DC Metro
G2 patch files: 1
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
elektro80
Site Admin

Joined: Mar 25, 2003 Posts: 21959 Location: Norway
Audio files: 14
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2009 2:05 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
doctorvague wrote: |
Electro80 - glad to hear your enthusiasm for Numerology! How do you use it? Everybody seems to use it differently. |
-As a replacement for walls and walls of analog step sequencers of all types. It simply isn´t sensible to fill up the apartment with such modules. I have way too much gear already. My problem right now is that I need more midi to CV interfaces. I have one working dotcom format 48 module ( or something.. I forget.. I chose a slightly different cab size than what is usual for the dotcom crowd. I have dotcom modules, and DIY projects to fill more than two more such cabs.. and need some plan for integrating two LCD displays and some controllers into this. However, I´ve probably decicded to postpone tearing down everything and putting it together for the nth time. I actually do need a working rig I can record music with.
Numerology is very good for all that small messy stuff that is easy to figure out but is way too fucked up to be easily accomplished using the other sequencing gear I have. Right.. and also for moving sequencing ideas out of the NM-1s and dump these on the dotcom.
Musically Numerology does not offer anything new in any way. It is simply a nice tool that enables me to do what I want. _________________ A Charity Pantomime in aid of Paranoid Schizophrenics descended into chaos yesterday when someone shouted, "He's behind you!"
MySpace
SoundCloud
Flickr |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
xav

Joined: Mar 21, 2005 Posts: 164 Location: paris
Audio files: 8
G2 patch files: 7
|
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 11:11 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
VAZ ad claims "Real-Time, low latency using DirectX (typically 18-40ms, dependant on soundcard/drivers)"...
Is it really so slow? |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
mosc
Site Admin

Joined: Jan 31, 2003 Posts: 18240 Location: Durham, NC
Audio files: 224
G2 patch files: 60
|
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:12 am Post subject:
|
 |
|
DirectX? I don't think DirectX is really suitable for serious audio. I've never found DirectX to work 1/2 as well as ASIO drivers. Maybe a big part of the soft synth market is people with very simple setups with on-board sound chips that don't support ASIO drivers.
This is a bit OT, but Windows really wants for a good audio routing program, like Jack on Linux and OSX. I recently got a RME Fireface400 interface and I was very pleasantly surprised that it includes fabulous audio routing and mixing. To me, this is the most powerful feature of the RME interfaces. More important that the improved audio quality and reliability, which is why I switched from MOTU.
I have VAC on my PC and I think it isn't very good. I even paid money for it.  _________________ --Howard
my music and other stuff |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
GovernorSilver

Joined: Apr 26, 2004 Posts: 1349 Location: Washington DC Metro
G2 patch files: 1
|
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
telstarmagikistferrari

Joined: Jun 16, 2008 Posts: 280 Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
Audio files: 43
|
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:02 pm Post subject:
|
 |
|
I'm all about some Synfactory myself, it's noisy as hell and fun to patch.
As an environment for most of my synthesis I use Plogue Bidule. |
|
Back to top
|
|
 |
|