No news about G2 OS update ?

jksuperstar · Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 7:02 am Post subject:

I'm still pushing the wavetable/sampling modules. Who knows, Clavia might learn a few new tricks from the users here on finishing up the new Nord Wave.

Fozzie · Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 7:47 am Post subject:

@ 3Phase: I edited my secondary vote; made a mistake (don't know if you processed 'em already)

@ JKS: Ok, you convinced me, although it's only a secondary for me Smile

3phase · Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 8:37 am Post subject:

3phase · Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 8:55 am Post subject:

@mom mysti..

but what bothers you about the top 10? i think exept of the gapless loading they are all pretty essential points... wide spread but usefull wishes..some heavy ones like the new voice allocation mode and the very usefull parameter exclusion... which are maybe unrealistic aswell..but wouldnt require new patch formats,,but low level neverthe less..all the other wishes sound resonable...

i personally would like to see the midi master functionality for send modules up..because that is a serious draw back of the instrument that you cant alter the outgoing midistream withou the editor so well... And more important..than it would be over with patches that only work in a specific slot...for me such a thing is really essential... i run so often in a situation where i check a patch in a session and it just dont works because its in the wrong slot or it sounds nice but polutes the recording with unwanted mididata... having the possibility to route midisend modules in the patch settings would help a lot.
Also a module that makes the knobs and buttons useable independently would help much more than unrealistic wishes..and such a module would be dead easy to implement for clavia... maybe it can be ssen as optimized display usage... its rather a display function than a new feature...just a value module with independent outputs for knob and button

so what would be in the top 10 for you when you could choose it?

3phase · Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2007 3:38 pm Post subject:

one question..just was thinking what optimizes display usage means... so point 23 and 24 could be seen as one group of wishes because a module that independently assignes knob and button does really nothing that optimizing the display usage...its actually part of the same wish together with other things that might give us more infos on the displays by customizing the function of button and knobs...

combining this would bring 23 and 24 within the top 10..or in this round direct to place 11-13..so in the top 20...

Smile

i know..sounds like dirty tricks..but from a logical point its a group of wishes that can be fullfilled in many ways where such a module is just one possible suggestion but within a common need to get more out of the g2, user interface... at least the wish for such a module was posted a few times in the past.. there was defenetly some demand in that direction...

Anybody out there that would back up this point of view?

are there other wishes you see n the list that are actually a group?

the editor improovements could be grouped aswell? its 2 different things but both are copy functions that improove the patch process..so defenetly in the same family of functions

opinions?

Parametex · Joined: Feb 07, 2005 Posts: 9 G2 patch files: 1

Nice nice nice !!!

Granular possibility, pitchbend out and buildingblocks for starters!

Worderful thread! Power to the people!

mother misty · Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 12:32 am Post subject:

3phase · Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2007 5:53 pm Post subject:

I asked for you secondary voting..the first i counteed of cause..

So you just vote the mod inputs for the string osc...

The delay dont actually needs to be longer..it needs to be cheaper...the quality is much to high for simple delay fx..its a total waste of valuable ram
I cant use the G2 delays for lung times..they are too expensiv...so its not a useless wish..even when ther was workarounds... so its not the hottest thing in the top list...

However.. interestimg result of this is that sequencers and a filter bank are asked most..

I personally would be happy to see at least theese 2 things happening...

All the other wishes are allmost all desirable for me...

the master midi function probably would have the biggest rise in comfort for me...

monokit · Posted: Tue Jun 05, 2007 10:22 pm Post subject:

And my votes are:

1. NM1/NL2 character support. Either as a patch-level switch or implemented in a number of modules. I like the G2 sound, but I often prefer the NM1/NL2 sound.

2. Reaktor style macro blocks (or building blocks as we call them). Imo extremely important to help abstracting parts of the patch. Or when repeating patterns are used.

3. Improved sample support.

4. Delay bug fixed (16/24 bit).

5. Improved sequencer support. Can't remember the problem atm, but it wasn't easy to build a more advanced sequencer with proper control and sync.

mosc · Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 1:52 pm Post subject:

OK, been busy for a while. Laughing

My happiness items.

1) Fixed filter bank
2) global velocity sensitivity (curves would be nice too, but not as essential as sensitivity).
3) pitch bend send module

dorremifasol · Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 11:25 pm Post subject:

My votes are for:

1) global keyboard velocity and aftertouch sensitivity
2) 24 bit delays, reverbs, instead of 16 bit. I still feel being fooled by clavia, the specs still say that memory is 24 bit.

Most important for me is the first point, because of my newborn son I don't have much time to patch, but I play other instruments with the G2 keyboard. In fact I bought the keyboard to be used as a master controller for my desktop. No way, I have to smash the keys so heavily to get some sound from my other sound modules that playing is not funny at all. At this point I'm thinking about selling the G2 as I need an useful keyboard.

gomidas · Posted: Fri Jun 08, 2007 8:07 am Post subject:

I would like to have a simple CC# for the TEMPO of the Master Clock, is that a silly wish? Laughing

suthnear · Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 3:33 am Post subject:

been busy, but I'd like to vote for the:
(1) wavetable/sample osc
(2) filter bank

Kassen · Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 9:06 am Post subject:

Fozzie · Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 12:10 pm Post subject:

Kassen · Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 2:22 pm Post subject:

Fozzie · Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 3:55 am Post subject:

Antimon · Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 5:28 am Post subject:

Mmm... bigger resolution on knobs... now there's a wish! Depending on much spaghetti there is in Clavia's code, that wish doesn't have to be as unrealistic as it sounds.

/Stefan

gomidas · Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 5:37 am Post subject:

iPassenger · Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 1:38 am Post subject:

So 3phase, where are we with this list now? Is it finished? Should we do a final re:vote on the top few to get the ultimate list and then send to Clavia?

3phase · Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 4:43 am Post subject:

i havent done the last count but with the method i choosed or with any other method it wont change the result around the top 10..

Exept we do a new alternate voting that starts from plain 0..

but how could we do this with a field of 50 items?

I sugest to keep it like that and send it to clavia ..

opinions please?

blue hell · Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 5:51 am Post subject:

iPassenger · Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 6:41 am Post subject:

I second that motion. Let's send it.

Jason · Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 7:59 am Post subject:

Yes compile and send please, we dont want to miss the boat... if there even is a boat Cool

Thank you for your hard work 3phase

mosc · Posted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 1:25 pm Post subject:

[quote="Blue Hell"]