Author |
Message |
Antimon
Joined: Jan 18, 2005 Posts: 4145 Location: Sweden
Audio files: 371
G2 patch files: 100
|
Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 11:18 am Post subject:
|
|
|
mother misty wrote: |
- decay & damp mod inputs on the string oscillator,
(would make this module alot more useful) |
I second that!
/Stefan _________________ Antimon's Window
@soundcloud @Flattr home - you can't explain music |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
T7
Joined: Jun 19, 2006 Posts: 105 Location: Cali
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 12:36 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Complete the unfinished physical modelling modules.
Fix the bugs. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Funky40
Joined: Sep 24, 2005 Posts: 875 Location: Swiss
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 5
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 7:15 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
my wishes:
1. ( A good) Fixed filterbank, but with Amplitude-modulation inputs per Band, and/or single outs.
mother misty wrote: | - decay & damp mod inputs on the string oscillator, | 2.I double this
3. Delay-clock sync bugfixing
4. SEquenzer Patterns
______________________________________________________________________
( maybe more related for a G3: ( as we should keep it here a realistic ) 9
5.A) very spezial: Polyphonic input and output modul
------> 4voice patch where all voices are sent to separate outs
------> or vise versa: 4 Input Signals are brought togehter as 1 polyphonic Voice
5. B) offset programming Acces for polyphonic voices
6. Time synced envelops |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Tim Kleinert
Joined: Mar 12, 2004 Posts: 1148 Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Audio files: 7
G2 patch files: 236
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Funky40
Joined: Sep 24, 2005 Posts: 875 Location: Swiss
Audio files: 1
G2 patch files: 5
|
Posted: Sat May 26, 2007 3:40 am Post subject:
|
|
|
ou cool, thank you.
Jan gave me some Weeks ago a help with this.
But i dont't understand it really and was not further working with.
I think your patch solve effectively my main wishes in this case, very cool. Thanks again.
This way one can also send also patches in a polyphonic way from one slot to another. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Tim Kleinert
Joined: Mar 12, 2004 Posts: 1148 Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Audio files: 7
G2 patch files: 236
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
3phase
Joined: Jul 27, 2004 Posts: 1183 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
3phase
Joined: Jul 27, 2004 Posts: 1183 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
3phase
Joined: Jul 27, 2004 Posts: 1183 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
blue hell
Site Admin
Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24079 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 278
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 6:33 am Post subject:
|
|
|
I'll vote for the up/down counter, and I'll vote on that one for Howard as well, I'm sure he would want me to
It would be a very useful building block for making all kinds of interesting sequencers that need a lot of modules otherwise.
I guess some more people might want to vote stuff up _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
blue hell
Site Admin
Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24079 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 278
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 6:35 am Post subject:
|
|
|
And the alternate tuning scales, come on people, a synth with this price tag should have decent tuning facilities built in _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
3phase
Joined: Jul 27, 2004 Posts: 1183 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 6:37 am Post subject:
|
|
|
One question.. Is a constant rate and a clocked synced envelope not essentially the same module? just with the difference that one is running on the system clock while the other is just running free?
So essentially a constant rate envelope that has a button that syncs it to the clock or its just running free?
Wright? because than the count for midi synced envelope would go one up while the constant rate wish is safed from beein burried in the mud of the wishlist...
ups.. i think i am wrong..am I? |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
3phase
Joined: Jul 27, 2004 Posts: 1183 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 7:06 am Post subject:
|
|
|
@ blue Hell
I agree that some of the things are way to much down...
And when they really do a sampleing delay module we might need a counter anyway to do usefull things with it...
But how shall we do it?
I would say we should at least keep the top 10 as they are because there is a pretty strong profile that i actually dont like to been washed away...
It shows the spontanious wish waht people wanted most...
When we discuss it in detail i get the problem to choose...
lets say i can place 3 primary wishes in the field of 11-50
and 6 secondary wishes..
the primary get 2 points and the secondary just one point each...
shall we try that and see what picture it gives?
So for example my primarys in the field between 11 and 50 are
improoved sound quality on overloads
master midicontrol for send modules
lofi/early ref/ reverb module
my secondary are
building block function in the editor or offline editing
mono/poly key/voice sorter
NM1 Overdrive
up/down counter
alt tuning scales
kangoo jump module
How about that? i would open an extra colum in the list to count this entrys...but.. everybody would have to give a list of 9 out of 40
or just the 3 primarys?
hoe about that?..
i just tried it..was not so easy to chose...i started with 3 secondary and realized thats not enough |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
3phase
Joined: Jul 27, 2004 Posts: 1183 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 7:27 am Post subject:
|
|
|
I just tried it..it might work out this way..depends on how many participate...
However..thats the good thing about excel..you can figur the weightening later...
i just added to columns to the list ..so there are the initial wish..in the moment that gets multiplyed by 3...
than there are the new primary and secondary voting columns...
the primary is multiplyed with 2...the secondary just counts 1 time...
I locked the top 10 away...i might try to have a higher multiplikator for the main vote...maybe 4 is more apropiate to keep things up that already got 3 votes in relation to the singular wishes when many people place additional votes...
We will see..
so please...
3 primary and up to 6 secondary wishes out of the places 11-49
Everybody please vote again to get your singular wishes or other things you might find usefull in the list higher in the ranking
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
12.45 KB |
Viewed: |
9263 Time(s) |
|
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
11.6 KB |
Viewed: |
9269 Time(s) |
|
Last edited by 3phase on Wed May 30, 2007 7:51 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
3phase
Joined: Jul 27, 2004 Posts: 1183 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 7:49 am Post subject:
|
|
|
@blue hell
i only counted your 2 primarys... up/down and tuning scales...
but not for mosc... so if mosc wishes to participate ? maybe its not a primary for him?
but... if enough people go for the tuning scales and the counter the realistically can go into the top 20...
I think the 3/2/1 weightening might be a decend choice to get a tendency..
At least we are not that many active users discussing here... should be enough to get the places 11-49 a bit better weighted...
I am not sure about my improoved sound quality wish..actually it might be unrealistic...depends if that is a structural thing or rather something that is just some wrong adjustments.. only clavia can answer that..
I personally liked the way the Nm1 sounds on overloads and feedbacked loops much more... still dont see a reason why this cant be achieved in the G2..but..i dont know anything about dsp programing..maybe it has to be that way... but maybe its a point that maybe just dont got adressed because there was no problem visibel in the early stages of the G2 development... For me it needed quite a while to feel a bit negativ about that issue... its needs some time patching to get the difference... This goes pretty much into the Nm1/G2 sound compatibility debate..are they supposed to sound the same and just dont ..or are they supposed to be very different...
We have discussed that before... And even when many say its allwright as it is there is also a strong tendency from people to keep theire Nm1 just because of that reason...or even old time users miss something on the G2 even when they never would say that loud...
So IMO.. clavia should at least look into this and just check if this is happening as a matter of fact or just related to some unencessary changes... however... i made it a prrimary even when its unrealistic..
would have liked to see the finer bpm ranges up too..
But... you can manage that by voting it |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
chinard
Joined: Dec 07, 2006 Posts: 23 Location: toronto
G2 patch files: 2
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 9:36 am Post subject:
|
|
|
has anybody put in for a MSB/LSB bank select option for the Midi Patch change module? |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
GovernorSilver
Joined: Apr 26, 2004 Posts: 1349 Location: Washington DC Metro
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 12:13 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Blue Hell wrote: | And the alternate tuning scales, come on people, a synth with this price tag should have decent tuning facilities built in |
Man, it doesn't look I'll find the time (within the next 6 months) to find a way to implement loading Scala .kbm files using the framework put in place by g2ian, let alone learn how to program in Python, as well as figure out how to make create a Building Block that does the tuning and keyboard mapping for the tuning only, so it can be patched onto any other sound (instead of having to rip out the piano sound-generating portion!).
What Ian did to get .scl files loaded into the G2 is huge, but you know I think it would be VERY nice if there was just a Tuning Module and a Keyboard Mapping Module instead of having to do these workarounds!
Or, even better, find a way to make it an optional Global setting. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
GovernorSilver
Joined: Apr 26, 2004 Posts: 1349 Location: Washington DC Metro
G2 patch files: 1
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 12:15 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
I voted for increased delay time already, but since it didn't make the chart, I'll vote again and again until it does!
Increase delay time
Increase delay time
Increase delay time
Increase delay time |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
blue hell
Site Admin
Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24079 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 278
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 12:24 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
3phase wrote: | but not for mosc... so if mosc wishes to participate ? maybe its not a primary for him?
|
Maybe not, maybe primary for him is :
(edit: picture got lost) _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
Last edited by blue hell on Thu Aug 23, 2007 1:15 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
blue hell
Site Admin
Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24079 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 278
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 12:29 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
3phase wrote: | @blue hell
i only counted your 2 primarys... up/down and tuning scales... |
The 3rd one will then be velocity curves (was 13).
No secondaries _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
3phase
Joined: Jul 27, 2004 Posts: 1183 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 1:42 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
aha the woodstock of electronic music...
But the secondary vote will be up for a while...so he can place his 3 primary and maybe secondarys himself?..
would help if a few more would participate...
As sait..the top 10 is a pretty good picture allready... but many good stuf in teh lower places that could be zup aswell.. As you said.. a instrument like the G2 defently should have different tunings...probably not so easy to implement in a modular system...
I added your points fo the velocity curves... |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
3phase
Joined: Jul 27, 2004 Posts: 1183 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 1:47 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
GovernorSilver wrote: | I voted for increased delay time already, but since it didn't make the chart, I'll vote again and again until it does!
Increase delay time
Increase delay time
Increase delay time
Increase delay time |
That is in the top 10 allready as lofi delay... what is ment as a delay module that has double time by reduced samplingrate... so no need to vote this again...
I count you as one primary extra vote for tuning tables...
so you could choose 2 points more..and some secondarys if you wish... Last edited by 3phase on Wed May 30, 2007 2:02 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
blue hell
Site Admin
Joined: Apr 03, 2004 Posts: 24079 Location: The Netherlands, Enschede
Audio files: 278
G2 patch files: 320
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 1:52 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
3phase wrote: | so he can place his 3 primary and maybe secondarys himself?.. |
Sure, and he should. I was just kidding of course, voting for him. 10 points for Lithuania _________________ Jan
also .. could someone please turn down the thermostat a bit.
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
3phase
Joined: Jul 27, 2004 Posts: 1183 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 1:58 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
lithuania?
I just checked..alternativ tuning scales are by now in the top 20 allready.. the up down counter still needs suporters ...so mosc better votes when he is back from the trip |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
3phase
Joined: Jul 27, 2004 Posts: 1183 Location: Berlin
Audio files: 13
G2 patch files: 141
|
Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 2:01 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
but of cause this should not prevent anybody that sees a need for alternativ tuning scales to vote for it... with the wightening a few votes for something else would kick it out again...so dont vote tactical..vote for that where you see personal your biggest need.. |
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|